Landscape Journal Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Landscape Jrnl. 20(2):156-175 (2001); doi:10.3368/lj.20.2.156
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Returning to Radburn

Michael David Martin

The "new urbanist" vision for contemporary neighborhoods looks back to the streetscapes of the pre-automobile era for inspiration, intentionally overlooking the automobile-adaptive community design era which began in America with Clarence Stein’s and Henry Wright’s "Town for the Motor Age" Radburn1 in the late 1920s. New urbanism establishes a theoretical position fundamentally at odds with "garden city" design principles which differentiate streetscapes and community open space. New urbanists do this by downplaying or ignoring the conflict inherent in the idea that a neighborhood street should attempt to serve as civic interface while simultaneously serving as the outdoor focus for neighborhood social life. The author proposes that experimental and innovative Radburn, rather than pre-modern, pre-automobile town design, is the logical starting point for understanding how to form contemporary neighborhoods, because Radburn actually began to address the dilemma posed by the new automobility. Subsequent "garden city" experiments such as the American New Towns of the 1960s and later planned unit developments paid homage to Radburn, but abandoned particular radical aspects of the Radburn concept; thus we have not witnessed the true evolution of Radburn in North American suburbia. However, the few planned communities which did remain true to Radburn’s radicalism, such as Winnipeg, Manitoba’s postwar Wildwood Park, do reflect this evolution. This paper will address the fundamental opposition that constitutes the relationship between new urbanism and the Radburn concept, and will reveal that the present-day landscapes of Wildwood Park and of Radburn itself have evolved to offer insights for how the Radburn concept can be adapted for contemporary community planning.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Copyright 2001 by The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System