Landscape Journal Land Economics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Landscape Jrnl. 27(1):23-40 (2008); doi:10.3368/lj.27.1.23
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, L. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Who "Designs" the Agricultural Landscape?

Laura L. Jackson

In the United States, the landscape most responsible for producing animal protein is the Upper Midwest "Corn Belt." Currently, this region is challenged by poor water quality, declining biological diversity, and decaying rural communities. It is also the region most responsible for the zone of hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico. This paper examines the question of who has designed the current agricultural landscape in the Corn Belt, and how it might best be re-designed to better serve broader public interests. Several modeling studies indicate that the region would benefit both economically and ecologically from increased perennial cover on the landscape. However, farmers’ options for meaningful land use change are significantly constrained by powerful market forces far removed from the region. Federal conservation programs have been poorly funded, and generally make minor improvements to conventional production systems, while commodity policy is heavily influenced by agribusiness interests. Metropolitan consumers can demand greater accountability from the global agribusiness corporations responsible for the design of the Corn Belt and work for food and agricultural policy that supports ecosystem health, public health, and health of rural communities.

KEYWORDS Agriculture, conservation, biological diversity, landscape ecology







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Copyright 2008 by The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System