Landscape Journal Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Landscape Jrnl. 27(1):127-141 (2008); doi:10.3368/lj.27.1.127
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hooper, V. H.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, C. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Theory and Practice Related to Native Plants

A Case Study of Utah Landscape Professionals

Virginia Harding Hooper, Joanna Endter-Wada and Craig W. Johnson


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 REFERENCES
 
As a result of a trend favoring ecological perspectives in design, significant changes have occurred in the landscape architecture profession in recent decades through the move to integrate ecological perspectives. This paper explores the distance between theory and practice in the use of native plants by landscape professionals. Results from a survey administered in 2002 to the Utah Chapter of the American Society of Landscape Architects are presented and analyzed in the context of three issues: the tension between aesthetic and scientific foundations in landscape architecture; constraints and trade-offs that landscape architects encounter in their work; and the need to balance universal and local dimensions of professional knowledge. Data from this research reveal that although survey participants expressed a general commitment to using native plants, they encountered challenges and constraints related to native plant availability, lack of customer receptivity, limitations in their own knowledge, ability of native plants to satisfy diverse and complex project objectives, and market forces within the landscape design and nursery industries.

KEYWORDS Native plants, plant design, sustainability, design theory, professional practice


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 Abstract
 REFERENCES
 

Ahern, Jack, Leduc Elizabeth, and Lee York Mary. 2006. Biodiveristy Planning and Design: Sustainable Practices.Sponsored by the Landscape Architecture Foundation. Washington, DC: Island Press.

Albee, Beverly, M. Shultz Leila, and Goodrich Sherel. 1988. Atlas of the Vascular Plants of Utah. Salt Lake City, UT: Utah Museum of Natural History.

Benson, John F., and H. Roe Maggie. 2000. Landscape and Sustainability. New York: Spon Press.

Brown, Brenda, ed. 1998. Eco-revelatory design: Nature constructed / nature revealed. Exhibit Catalogue. Landscape Journal, special issue.

Calkins, Meg. 2005. Strategy use and challenges of ecological design in landscape architecture. Landscape and Urban Planning 73(1): 29–48.

Clouston, Brian. 1998. Landscape Design with Plants. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Collinge, Sharon K. 1996. Ecological consequences of habitat fragmentation: Implications for landscape architecture and planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 36(1): 59–77.

Daugstad, Karoline, Svarstad Hanne, and Inge Vistad Odd. 2006. A case of confl icts in conservation: Two trenches or a three-dimensional complexity? Landscape Research 31(1): 1–19.

Diekelmann, John, and M. Schuster Robert. 2002. Natural Landscaping: Designing with Native Plant Communities.Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

Dillman, Don A. 2000. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Dirr, Michael A. 1998. Manual of Woody Landscape Plants: Their Identification, Ornamental Characteristics, Culture, Propagation and Uses. 5th ed. Champaign, IL: Stipes Publishing Company.

Egan, Dave, and William H. Tishler 1999. Jens Jensen, native plants, and the concept of nordic superiority. Landscape Journal 18(1): 11–29.

Galatowitsch, Susan M. 1998. Ecological design for environmental problem solving. Landscape Journal 17(2): 99–107.

Gobster, Paul H. 2001. Visions of nature: Confl ict and compatibility in urban park restoration. Landscape and Urban Planning 56(1–2): 35–51.

Gobster, Paul H., and R. Bruce Hull, eds. 2000. Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities. Washington, DC: Island Press.

Groening, Gert, and Wolschke-Bulmahn Joachim. 2003. The native plant enthusiasm: Ecological panacea or xenophobia? Landscape Research 28(1): 75–88.

Guenter, Megan. 2006. The role of Utah garden centers in furthering public knowledge about waterwise plants and landscaping. MS thesis, Utah State Univ.

Hall, Marcus. 2003. Editorial: The native, naturalized and exotic-plants and animals in human history. Landscape Research 28(1): 5–9.

Harper-Lore, Bonnie, and Wilson Maggie. 2000. Roadside Use of Native Plants. Washington, DC: Island Press.

Henry, A. C. Jr., D. A. Hosack, C. W. Johnson, D. Rol, and G. Bentrup 1999. Conservation corridors in the United States: Benefits and planning guidelines. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 54(4): 647–650.

Hooper, V. H. 2003. Understanding Utah’s native plant market: Coordinating public and private interest. MLA thesis, Utah State Univ.

Howett, Catherine. 1987. Systems, signs and sensibilities: Source for a new landscape aesthetic. Landscape Journal 6(1): 1–12.

Howett, Catherine. 1998. Ecological values in twentieth-century landscape design: A history and hermeneutics. Landscape Journal 17(2): 80–98.

Kendle, Anthony D., and Julie E. Rose 2000. The aliens have landed! What are the justifications for "native only’ policies in landscape plantings? Landscape and Urban Planning 47(1–2): 19–31.

Levetin, Estelle, and McMahon Karen. 2006. Plants and Society. 4th ed. New York: McGraw Hill Publishing Company.

Lowry, Judith Larner. 1999. Gardening with a Wild Heart: Restoring California’s Native Landscapes at Home. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Lyle, John Tillman. 1994. Regenerative Design for Sustainable Development. New York: John Wiley.

Mack, Richard N., and W. Mark Lonsdale 2001. Humans as global plant dispersers: Getting more than we bargained for. BioScience 51(2): 95–102.

Mee, Wendy, Jared Barnes, Roger Kjelgren, Richard Sutton, Teresa Cerny, and Craig Johnson. 2002. Water Wise: Native Plants for Intermountain Landscapes. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.

Meyer, Susan E. 2005. Intermountain native plant growers association: A nonprofit trade organization promoting landscape use of native plants. Native Plants 6(2): 104–107.

Miller, Marc L., and Robert N. Fabian, eds. 2004. Harmful Invasive Species: Legal Responses. Washington, DC: Environmental Law Institute.

Mozingo, Louise A. 1997. The aesthetics of ecological design: Seeing science as culture. Landscape Journal 16(1): 46–59.[Medline]

Nabors, Murray. 2004. Introduction to Botany. New York: Benjamin Cummings.

Nassauer, Joan Iverson. 1995. Messy ecosystems, orderly frames. Landscape Journal 14(2): 161–170.

Nollman, Jim. 1994. Why We Garden: Cultivating a Sense of Place. New York: Holt.

Ndubisi, Forster. 2002a. Managing change in the landscape: A synthesis of approaches for ecological planning. Landscape Journal 21(1): 138–155.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ndubisi, Forster. 2002b. Ecological Planning: A Historical and Comparative Synthesis. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Robertson, David P., and R. Bruce Hull 2001. Which nature? A case study of Whitetop Mountain. Landscape Journal 20(2): 176–185.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Robertson, Iain M. 1991. Plants as a medium for design expression and the imperatives of the avantgarde. Landscape Journal 10(1): 68–73.

Rosenberg, Ann M. 1986. An emerging paradigm for landscape architecture. Landscape Journal 5(2): 75–82.

Sepahi, Ali. 2000. Nature as a model for large-scale planting design. Landscape Research 25(1): 63–77.

Stein, Achva Benzinberg, and Jacqueline Claire Moxley. 1992. In defense of the nonnative: The case of the eucalyptus. Landscape Journal 11(1): 35–50.

Stein, Bruce A. 2002. States of the Union: Ranking America’s Biodiversity. Arlington, VA: Nature Serve.

Thayer, Robert L. Jr. 1994. Gray World, Green Heart: Technology, Nature, and the Sustainable Landscape. New York: Wiley.

Thayer, Robert L. Jr. 1998. Landscape as an ecologically revealing language. Landscape Journal 17(2): 118–129.

Thompson, Ian H. 1998. Environmental ethics and the development of landscape architectural theory. Landscape Research 23(2): 175–194.

Thompson, J. William, and Kim Sorvig. 2000. Sustainable Landscape Construction: A Guide to Green Building Outdoors. Washington, DC: Island Press.

Treib, Marc, ed. 1993. Modern Landscape Architecture: A Critical Review. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hooper, V. H.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, C. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Copyright 2008 by The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System