Landscape Journal Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Landscape Jrnl. 21(1):138-155 (2002); doi:10.3368/lj.21.1.138
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ndubisi, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Managing Change in the Landscape: A Synthesis of Approaches for Ecological Planning

Forster Ndubisi

The field of ecological planning has expanded vastly in the past four decades. The expansion has occurred, not only in terms of the type, scale, and scope of issues it addresses, but also in the diversity of approaches currently in use. Existing information on approaches and methods in ecological planning is not organized in a systemic and coherent fashion to readily illuminate theoretical-methodological issues inherent when one approach is favored over the other. Sustained design, planning, and management of landscapes depend largely on how we understand, evaluate, and interpret landscapes. This article isolates five key contemporary approaches to ecological planning, advances a critical synthesis of the approaches, and prescribes situations when to favor one approach rather than another in balancing ecological concerns with human use. Each approach offers an alternative perspective on how to best balance ecological concerns with human use. This article argues that despite the differences among the approaches, significant overlap exists. In practice, the approaches draw on relevant principles from each other. The article concludes that no approach itself can address the scope and complexity of ecological planning problems. Planners and landscape architects should adopt the strong but workable features of all the approaches, as needed.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Landscape Jrnl.Home page
V. H. Hooper, J. Endter-Wada, and C. W. Johnson
Theory and Practice Related to Native Plants: A Case Study of Utah Landscape Professionals
Landscape Jrnl., January 1, 2008; 27(1): 127 - 141.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Copyright 2002 by The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System