Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • ASLA Research Grant
  • Other Publications
    • UWP

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Landscape Journal
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Landscape Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • ASLA Research Grant
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticleArticles

Challenging Formalism: The Implications of Contemporary Cultural Theory for Historic Preservation

Kenrick Ian Grandison
Landscape Journal, March 1999, 18 (1) 30-40; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.18.1.30
Kenrick Ian Grandison
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Contemporary cultural theory has taken hold in a wide range of academic disciplines such as literary studies, anthropology, and history, and has succeeded in challenging conceptions of “culture” that once circumscribed these disciplines' intellectual endeavors. No longer do we hear literary critics indiscriminately expound on “culture” as “the best that has been thought and said in the world” (to recall Matthew Arnold's phrase) or insist on this notion of “culture” as the universal basis of their criticism. Instead, academia now operates with a growing awareness of multiculturalism, forcing disciplines to engage the histories and identities of groups heretofore not recognized as contributing to history. In the field of historic preservation, however, attempts to embrace multiculturalism are hindered by a continuing desire to valorize a canon: a static group of cultural products considered to be “great.” “High” cultural assumptions still predominate as the basis of discourse in historic preservation; theorists and practitioners consciously and unconsciously continue to insist on the canon as a standard.

Historic preservation therefore is left with a dilemma: it tries to expand the canon to include the once ignored places, but at the same time desires to leave unquestioned the assumptions that originally led to the exclusion of these places. This essay seeks to elucidate these assumptions, showing how high cultural ideas have persisted in the field and more generally within discourses of the built environment. Challenging formalism in these discourses, the essay sets the stage for further critical work, especially regarding the theory and practices of historic preservation.

  • © 1999 by the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Landscape Journal
Vol. 18, Issue 1
20 Mar 1999
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Landscape Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Challenging Formalism: The Implications of Contemporary Cultural Theory for Historic Preservation
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Landscape Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Landscape Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Challenging Formalism: The Implications of Contemporary Cultural Theory for Historic Preservation
Kenrick Ian Grandison
Landscape Journal Mar 1999, 18 (1) 30-40; DOI: 10.3368/lj.18.1.30

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Challenging Formalism: The Implications of Contemporary Cultural Theory for Historic Preservation
Kenrick Ian Grandison
Landscape Journal Mar 1999, 18 (1) 30-40; DOI: 10.3368/lj.18.1.30
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • The Skyscrapers Unseeing Eyes: Louis Sullivan, Nella Larsen, and Racial Formalism
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A Tribute to Robert B. Riley 1931–2019
  • Fluid or Fixed? Processes that Facilitate or Constrain a Sense of Inclusion in Participatory Schoolyard and Park Design
  • Diversity and Inclusion by Design: A Challenge for Us All
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

UWP

© 2023 Landscape Journal

Powered by HighWire