Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • ASLA Research Grant
  • Other Publications
    • UWP

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Landscape Journal
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Landscape Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • ASLA Research Grant
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticleArticles

Participation and Community at the Landscape Scale

Stanton Jones
Landscape Journal, March 1999, 18 (1) 65-78; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.18.1.65
Stanton Jones
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Since its rise to prominence in the design and planning fields in the early to mid-1960s, citizen paritcipation processes and the contexts within which they occur have experienced an evolution that has impacted significantly both the practice of participation and the final results emanating from these processes. Over the last twenty years, several different methodologies have been crafted, each describing how groups of various sizes and constituencies could use participatory processes to address any number of issues and/or problems. Unfortunately, since smaller, “neighborhood scale” contexts were generally used as their primary referents, the transferability of these processes to larger, landscape-scale environments was in fact limileg; processes used in more densely populaled areas were found to be less well suited for use in langscapes where the impact of land ownership patterns, “company town” realities, and the role of ecological processes were much more integral to the success of the project or participatory process. This paper, filling a need for up-to-date case studies in participatory planning and design, identifies several critical issues to consider when utilizing participatory techniques in larger geograpaical and less densely-populated contexts. It then uses two case studies in the state of Oregon to illustrate these issues and to lead into a discussion of how participation at the landscape scale could and should evolve in the future.

  • © 1999 by the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Landscape Journal
Vol. 18, Issue 1
20 Mar 1999
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Landscape Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Participation and Community at the Landscape Scale
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Landscape Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Landscape Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Participation and Community at the Landscape Scale
Stanton Jones
Landscape Journal Mar 1999, 18 (1) 65-78; DOI: 10.3368/lj.18.1.65

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Participation and Community at the Landscape Scale
Stanton Jones
Landscape Journal Mar 1999, 18 (1) 65-78; DOI: 10.3368/lj.18.1.65
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A Tribute to Robert B. Riley 1931–2019
  • Fluid or Fixed? Processes that Facilitate or Constrain a Sense of Inclusion in Participatory Schoolyard and Park Design
  • Diversity and Inclusion by Design: A Challenge for Us All
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

UWP

© 2023 Landscape Journal

Powered by HighWire