Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • ASLA Research Grant
  • Other Publications
    • UWP

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Landscape Journal
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Landscape Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • ASLA Research Grant
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticleConferences

Reliability of Rating Visible Landscape Qualities

James F. Palmer
Landscape Journal, January 2000, 19 (1-2) 166-178; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.19.1-2.166
James F. Palmer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Reliability is measured by whether an investigation will obtain similar results when it is repeated by another party. It is argued that reliability is important at the level of individuals. While all landscape assessments are based on individual judgments, they are frequently aggregated to form composite judgments. The use of inter-group, intra-group and interrater measures of reliability in the landscape perception literature is reviewed. This paper investigates the reliability of assessing various visible landscape qualities using data primarily from previously published studies. The results indicate that there is reason for concern about the reliability of rating scales used in this field, and suggest actions for both research and practice.

Landscape studies have joined the shifting sands of scholarly inquiry. The empirical positivist tradition continues to hold that there is an objective landscape that can be studied through the careful application of scientific principles. Post-positivists, among whom I include myself, stand back from the stranglehold that science recently held on legitimate knowledge. They acknowledge other ways of knowing, but favor empirical methods of discovery. In response to positivism, post-modern landscape scholars with diverse viewpoints are investigating new ways to explore the personal meaning that landscapes hold for us. For instance, Norberg-Schulz (1979) has contributed to the rising importance of genius loci, Potteiger and Purinton (1998) are exploring landscape narratives, and Brook (1998) is adapting Goethe's approach to scientific inquiry through direct experience. In this flurry of activity some foundational attributes of applied everyday experience are lost or ignored. One such attribute is reliability, which is the subject of this paper.

  • © 2000 by the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Landscape Journal
Vol. 19, Issue 1-2
1 Jan 2000
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Landscape Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reliability of Rating Visible Landscape Qualities
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Landscape Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Landscape Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Reliability of Rating Visible Landscape Qualities
James F. Palmer
Landscape Journal Jan 2000, 19 (1-2) 166-178; DOI: 10.3368/lj.19.1-2.166

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Reliability of Rating Visible Landscape Qualities
James F. Palmer
Landscape Journal Jan 2000, 19 (1-2) 166-178; DOI: 10.3368/lj.19.1-2.166
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Conferences

  • Teaching and Learning Landscape 2008 Annual Meeting of the Council of Educators in Landscape Architecture, Tucson, Arizona, January 14–17, 2009
  • Ecological Urbanism: Sustainable Cities of the Future Harvard Graduate School of Design, Cambridge, Massachussetts, April 3–5, 2009
  • Landscape Design in the City: Historical Landscapes in the Modern Era St. Petersburg State Forest Technical Academy, Michailovsky Castle of the Russian Museum, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, June 1–3, 2009
Show more Conferences

1998 CELA Conference Proceedings

  • Teaching and Learning Landscape 2008 Annual Meeting of the Council of Educators in Landscape Architecture, Tucson, Arizona, January 14–17, 2009
  • Ecological Urbanism: Sustainable Cities of the Future Harvard Graduate School of Design, Cambridge, Massachussetts, April 3–5, 2009
  • Landscape Design in the City: Historical Landscapes in the Modern Era St. Petersburg State Forest Technical Academy, Michailovsky Castle of the Russian Museum, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, June 1–3, 2009
Show more 1998 CELA Conference Proceedings

Similar Articles

UWP

© 2023 Landscape Journal

Powered by HighWire