Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • ASLA Research Grant
  • Other Publications
    • UWP

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Landscape Journal
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Landscape Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • ASLA Research Grant
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticleArticles

Comparing Stormwater Impacts and Costs on Three Neighborhood Plan Types

Cynthia Girling and Ronald Kellett
Landscape Journal, January 2002, 21 (1) 100-109; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.21.1.100
Cynthia Girling
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ronald Kellett
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

This paper summarizes a comparison of three alternative plans for a demonstration development site for environmental impacts, particularly stormwater quantity and quality, and costs of development. Two of the three alternatives are representative of neighborhood plan types in many areas of the United States—a conventional low density pattern typical of many subdivision developments, and a more dense, mixed use new urbanist-influenced pattern. A third less common but lower environmental impact plan represents similar density and land use mixes to the mixed use plan with greater open space, urban forest and stormwater features. Each plan preserves different amounts of open space and pursues different approaches to infrastructure, urban forests and stormwater management. Comparing neighborhood development patterns from a stormwater perspective, the findings suggest that the higher densities, mixed uses and greater vehicular and pedestrian connectivity now encouraged in Oregon and elsewhere in the nation can either compete with or complement goals of water resource protection and stormwater runoff reduction. To become both complementary and cost-effective, strategic tradeoffs must be made between land dedicated to roads and parking and land dedicated to open space, urban forest and stormwater.

  • © 2002 by the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Landscape Journal
Vol. 21, Issue 1
1 Jan 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Landscape Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparing Stormwater Impacts and Costs on Three Neighborhood Plan Types
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Landscape Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Landscape Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Comparing Stormwater Impacts and Costs on Three Neighborhood Plan Types
Cynthia Girling, Ronald Kellett
Landscape Journal Jan 2002, 21 (1) 100-109; DOI: 10.3368/lj.21.1.100

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparing Stormwater Impacts and Costs on Three Neighborhood Plan Types
Cynthia Girling, Ronald Kellett
Landscape Journal Jan 2002, 21 (1) 100-109; DOI: 10.3368/lj.21.1.100
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Toward Ecosystem Services as a Basis for Design
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A Tribute to Robert B. Riley 1931–2019
  • A Tribute to Pat Dwayne Taylor, PhD, FASLA, FCELA (July 7, 1944–September 8, 2018)
  • Designing the Correctional Landscape: An Invitation to Landscape Architecture Professionals
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

UWP

© 2023 Landscape Journal

Powered by HighWire