Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • ASLA Research Grant
  • Other Publications
    • UWP

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Landscape Journal
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Landscape Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • ASLA Research Grant
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticleArticles

Easement Exchanges for Agricultural Conservation: A Case Study Under the Williamson Act in California

Brendan Stewart and Timothy P. Duane
Landscape Journal, January 2009, 28 (2) 181-197; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.28.2.181
Brendan Stewart
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy P. Duane
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Rapid population growth has made farmland conservation a concern throughout the world, leading state and local decision-makers to conserve agricultural land through a variety of policy tools. Among the most prominent strategies in recent years has been the direct purchase of development rights or the acquisition of agricultural conservation easements through purchase, donation, or exchange. However, the effectiveness of conservation easements has been questioned recently by scholars while public accountability for their adoption has been relatively thin. This article evaluates implementation of California’s Williamson Act contract cancellation and easement exchange program (WAEE) as a mitigation measure against the loss of agricultural land, offering important insights into the strengths and weaknesses of exchanges as a policy tool. We recommend a significant modification to the existing structure of the program that should also be considered by other jurisdictions exploring easement exchanges as a means of conserving agricultural land. Cancellation fees from non-exchanges should be transferred directly to the state budget for the acquisition of conservation easements in the region in which contracts are being cancelled, thereby creating an incentive for the state conservation agency to conduct a more critical evaluation of the proposed easement exchange in comparison to direct acquisition of other conservation easements.

  • agricultural conservation easements
  • easement exchanges
  • Williamson Act
  • © 2009 by the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Landscape Journal: 28 (2)
Landscape Journal
Vol. 28, Issue 2
1 Jan 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Landscape Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Easement Exchanges for Agricultural Conservation: A Case Study Under the Williamson Act in California
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Landscape Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Landscape Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Easement Exchanges for Agricultural Conservation: A Case Study Under the Williamson Act in California
Brendan Stewart, Timothy P. Duane
Landscape Journal Jan 2009, 28 (2) 181-197; DOI: 10.3368/lj.28.2.181

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Easement Exchanges for Agricultural Conservation: A Case Study Under the Williamson Act in California
Brendan Stewart, Timothy P. Duane
Landscape Journal Jan 2009, 28 (2) 181-197; DOI: 10.3368/lj.28.2.181
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A Tribute to Robert B. Riley 1931–2019
  • A Tribute to Pat Dwayne Taylor, PhD, FASLA, FCELA (July 7, 1944–September 8, 2018)
  • Designing the Correctional Landscape: An Invitation to Landscape Architecture Professionals
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • agricultural conservation easements
  • easement exchanges
  • Williamson Act
UWP

© 2023 Landscape Journal

Powered by HighWire