Local Residents’ Preferences and Attitudes toward Creating Defensible Space against Wildfire in the Northeast Pine Barrens

REFERENCES

1. 1. Babbie Earl R

   . 1990. Survey Research Methods, 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
2. 1. Blanchard Brian,
   2. Ryan Robert L.

   2007. Managing the wildland-urban interface in the northeastern United States: Perceptions of fire risk and hazard reduction strategies. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 24 (3): 203–208.

   OpenUrlWeb of Science
3. 1. Brown Tom C.,
   2. Daniel Terry

   . 1986. Predicting scenic beauty of timber stands. Forest Science 32: 471–487.

   OpenUrlWeb of Science
4. 1. Central Pine Barrens Commission

   . 2010. Where and what are the “Central Pine Barrens” of New York? Fact sheet. pb.state.ny.us/general/cpb_fact_sheet.htm [January 6, 2010].
5. 1. Cooper-Marcus, Clare

   . 1995. House as a Mirror of Self: Exploring the Deeper Meaning of Home. Berkeley, CA: Conari.
6. 1. Cortner Hanna J.,
   2. Gardner Philip,
   3. Taylor John

   . 1990. Fire hazards at the urban-wildland interface: What the public expects. Environmental Management 14 (1): 57–62.

   OpenUrl
7. 1. Cronbach Lee J

   . 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16: 297–335.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. 1. Davis James B

   . 1990. The wildland-urban interface: Paradise or battleground? Journal of Forestry 88 (1): 26–31.

   OpenUrl
9. 1. Dillman Don A

   . 2007. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
10. 1. Dwyer John F.,
    2. Schroeder Herb W.,
    3. Gobster Paul H.

    1991. The significance of urban trees and forests: Toward a deeper understanding of values. Journal of Arboriculture 17: 276–284.

    OpenUrl
11. 1. Firewise Communities

    . 2010. About Firewise. www.firewise.org/index.php [January 13, 2010].
12. 1. Foster David K.,
    2. O’Keefe John F.

    2000. New England Forests through Time: Insights from the Harvard Forest Dioramas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
13. 1. Gobster Paul H

    . 1995. Aldo Leopold’s ecological esthetic: Integrating esthetic and biodiversity values. Journal of Forestry 93 (2): 6–10.

    OpenUrl
14. 1. Gregg Chris E.,
    2. Houghton Bruce F.,
    3. Johnston David M.,
    4. Paton Douglas,
    5. Swanson Dan A.

    2004. The perception of volcanic risk in Kona communities from Mauna Loa and Hualdlai volcanoes, Hawai’i. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 130 (3–4): 179–196.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
15. 1. Irland Lloyd C

    . 1999. The Northeast’s Changing Forest. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. 1. Jordan Marilyn J.,
    2. Patterson William A. III.,
    3. Windisch Andrew G.

    2003. Conceptual ecological models for the Long Island pitch pine barrens: Implications for managing rare plant communities. Forest Ecology and Management 185 (2003): 151–168.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. 1. Kaplan Rachel

    . 1985. Nature at the doorstep: Residential satisfaction and the nearby environment. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 2: 115–127.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
18. 1. Kaplan Rachel,
    2. Austin Maureen E.,
    3. Kaplan Stephen

    . 2004. Open space communities: Resident perceptions, nature benefits, and problems with terminology. Journal of the American Planning Association 70 (3): 300–313.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. 1. Kaplan Rachel,
    2. Herbert Eugene J.

    1987. Cultural and subcultural comparisons in preference for natural settings. Landscape and Urban Planning 14: 281–1283.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. 1. Kaplan Rachel,
    2. Kaplan Stephen

    . 1989. The Experience of Nature. New York: Cambridge University Press. (Reprinted by Ulrich’s, Ann Arbor, MI).
21. 1. Kaplan Rachel,
    2. Kaplan Stephen,
    3. Ryan Robert L.

    1998. With People in Mind: Design and Management of Everyday Nature. Washington, DC: Island.
22. 1. Kearney Anne R

    . 2006. Residential development patterns and neighborhood satisfaction: Impacts of density and nearby nature. Environment and Behavior 38 (1), 112–113.

    OpenUrlAbstract
23. 1. Kumagai Yoshitaka,
    2. Carroll Matthew S.,
    3. Cohn Patricia

    . 2004. Coping with interface wildfire as a human event: Lessons from the disaster / hazard literature. Journal of Forestry 102 (9): 28–32.

    OpenUrl
24. 1. Lavin Martin

    . 1997. Managing fire risk to people, structures, and the environment. Fire Management Notes 57 (4): 4–6.

    OpenUrl
25. 1. Loomis John B.,
    2. Bair Lucas S.,
    3. Gonzalez-Caban Armando

    . 2001. Prescribed fire and public support: Knowledge gained, attitudes changed in Florida. Journal of Forestry 99 (11): 18–22.

    OpenUrl
26. 1. Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation (M-DCR)

    . 2010. Forest fire control: Facts. www.mass.gov/dcr/stewardship/firecont/facts.htm [January 8, 2010].
27. 1. McCaffrey Sarah

    . 2008. Understanding public perspectives of wildfire risk. In Wildfire Risk: Human Perceptions and Management Implications, ed. Kent Brian, Martin Wade, Raisch Carol, 11–22. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
28. 1. McFadden Robert D

    . 1995. Fires race across eastern L.I., destroying homes. The New York Times 164 (50): 1, B5, August 25, 1995.

    OpenUrl
29. 1. Morancho Aurelia B

    . 2003. A hedonic valuation of urban green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 66: 35–41.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. 1. Nassauer Joan I

    . 1995. Messy ecosystems, orderly frames. Landscape Journal 14 (2): 161–170.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
31. 1. Nassauer Joan I.,
    2. Wang Zhifang,
    3. Dayrell Erik

    . 2009. What will the neighbors think? Cultural norms and ecological design. Landscape and Urban Planning 92 (3–4): 282–292.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
32. 1. National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC)

    . 2010. Fire information—Wildland Fire Statistics: 2002 Year-to-date report on fires and acres burned by state. www.nifc.gov/fire_info/ytd_state_2002.htm [January 8, 2010].
33. 1. Nunnally Jum C

    . 1978. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
34. 1. Radeloff Volker C.,
    2. Hammer Roger B.,
    3. Stewart Susan I.,
    4. Fried Jeremy S.,
    5. Holcomb Sherry S.,
    6. McKeefry Jason F.

    2005. The wildland-urban interface in the United States. Ecological Applications 15 (3): 799–805.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
35. 1. Reinhardt Elizabeth D.,
    2. Keane Robert E.,
    3. Calkin David E.,
    4. Cohen Jack D.

    2008. Objectives and considerations for wildland fuel treatment in forested ecosystems of the interior western United States. Forest Ecology and Management 256 (12): 1997–2006.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
36. 1. Ribe Robert G

    . 2009. In-stand scenic beauty of variable retention harvests and mature forests in the U.S. Pacific Northwest: The effects of basal area, density, retention pattern and down wood. Journal of Environmental Management 91 (1): 245–260.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
37. 1. Ruddell Edward J.,
    2. Gramann James H.,
    3. Rudis Victor A.,
    4. Westphal Joanne M.

    1989. The psychological utility of visual penetration in near-view forest scenic-beauty models. Environment and Behavior 21 (4): 393–41.

    OpenUrlAbstract
38. 1. Ryan Robert L

    . 2002. Preserving rural character in New England: Local residents’ perceptions of alternative residential development. Landscape and Urban Planning 61: 19–35.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
39. 1. Ryan Robert L

    . 2005a. Exploring the effects of environmental experience on attachment to urban natural areas. Environment and Behavior 37: 3–42.

    OpenUrlAbstract
40. 1. Ryan Robert L

    . 2005b. Social Science to Improve Fuels Management: A Synthesis on Aesthetics and Fuels Management. General Technical Report NC-261. St. Paul, MN: USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station.
41. 1. Ryan Robert L

    . unpublished. The influence of landscape preference and environmental education on public attitudes toward wildfire management in the Northeast pine barrens.
42. 1. Ryan Robert L.,
    2. Wamsley Mark B

    . 2008. Public perceptions of wildfire risk and forest management in the Central Pine Barrens of Long Island (USA). Australasian Journal of Disaster and Trauma Studies 2008 (2). www.massey.ac.nz/~trauma/issues/2008-2/ryan.htm [March 10, 2010].
43. 1. Scott Joseph H

    . 1998. Fuel Reduction in Residential and Scenic Forests: A Comparison of Three Treatments in a Western Montana Ponderosa Pine Stand. Research Paper RMRS-RP-5. Ft. Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
44. 1. Shelby Bo,
    2. Tokarczyk John A.,
    3. Johnson Rebecca L.

    2004. Timber harvests and forest neighbors: The urban fringe research project at Oregon State University. Journal of Forestry 102 (2): 8–13.

    OpenUrl
45. 1. Thompson Richard,
    2. Piirto Douglas,
    3. Noel Jay,
    4. Hanna Richard

    . 1999. Valuation of tree aesthetics on small urban-interface properties. Journal of Arboriculture 25 (5): 225–234.

    OpenUrl
46. 1. U.S. Census Bureau

    . 2000. Census of Population and Housing. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, U.S. Census Bureau.
47. 1. U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of the Interior (DOA-DOI)

    . 2001. Urban wildland interface communities within the vicinity of federal lands that are at high risk from wildfire. Federal Register 66 (160): 43384–43435.

    OpenUrl
48. 1. Vining Joanne,
    2. Daniel Terry C.,
    3. Schroeder Herb W.

    1984. Predicting scenic values in forested residential landscapes. Journal of Leisure Research 16 (2): 124–135.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
49. 1. Winter Greg J.,
    2. Vogt Christine A.,
    3. McCaffrey Sarah

    . 2004. Examining social trust in fuels management strategies. Journal of Forestry 102 (9): 8–15.

    OpenUrl