Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • ASLA Research Grant
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Ecological Restoration
    • Land Economics
    • Native Plants Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Landscape Journal
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Ecological Restoration
    • Land Economics
    • Native Plants Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Landscape Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • ASLA Research Grant
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticleArticles

Nature Big and Small

Landscape Planning in the Wilds of Los Angeles

Marcia J. McNally
Landscape Journal, March 2011, 30 (1) 19-34; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.30.1.19
Marcia J. McNally
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

    1. Butler Tom
    , ed. 2003–2004. The National Wildlife Refuge System. Wild Earth 13 (4). Canton, NY: Wild Earth Association.
    1. Community Development by Design (CDBD)
    . 1991. Mulholland Gateway Park. Los Angeles: Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy.
    1. Community Development by Design (CDBD)
    . 2005a. The Los Angeles River Urban Wildlife Refuge: A Vision for Parks, Habitat, and Urban Runoff. Los Angeles: Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy.
    1. Community Development by Design (CDBD)
    . 2005b. Proposition 50: Proposals for Eight Neighborhood Watershed Interventions. Los Angeles: Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy.
    1. Community Development by Design (CDBD)
    . 2006. Investigating the Neighborhood Landscape: Case Studies on the Los Angeles River. Research report, Department of Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning. Berkeley: University of California.
    1. California State Parks
    . 2005. Park and Recreation Trends in California 2005. Sacramento: State of California.
    1. Chan Kathleen
    . 2003. Personal conversation.
    1. Clay Grady
    . 2003. The cross section as a learning tool. In Everyday America: Cultural Landscape Studies after J. B. Jackson, ed. Wilson Chris, Groth Paul, 109–129. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    1. Davidoff Paul
    . 1965. Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 31 (4): 331–338.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Davis Mike
    . 1992. City of Quartz. New York: Vintage Books.
    1. Davis Mike
    . 1998. Ecology of Fear: Los Angeles and the Imagination of Disaster. New York: Metropolitan Books.
    1. Dramstad Wenche,
    2. James Olson,
    3. Forman Richard
    . 1996. Landscape Ecology Principles in Landscape Architecture and Land Use Planning. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
    1. Forester John
    . 1989. Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    1. Forester John
    . 1999. The Deliberative Practitioner. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    1. Francis Mark
    . 2004. The Reflexive Practitioner. In Democratic Design in the Pacific Rim 1999: United States, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Japan, ed. Nagahashi Tamesuke, Sugita Sanae, Kimura Naoke, 156–163. Kyoto, Japan: Tadasu Shobo.
    1. Forsyth Ann,
    2. Crewe Katherine
    . 2004. LandSCAPES: Six approaches to landscape architecture. Landscape Architecture 94 (5): 36, 38–40, 42, 44, 46–47.
    OpenUrl
    1. Garrett Kimball
    . 1993. The Biota of the L.A. River. Los Angeles: Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County.
    1. Gumprecht Blake
    . 1999. The Los Angeles River: Its Life, Death, and Possible Rebirth. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    1. Halprin Lawrence
    . 2002. The RSVP Cycles. In Theory in Landscape Architecture: A Reader, ed. Swaffield Simon, 43–48. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    1. Harnik Peter
    . 2000. Inside City Parks. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
    1. Hester Randolph Jr..
    1975. Neighborhood Space. Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson, and Ross.
    1. Hester Randolph Jr..
    1982. Planning Neighborhood Space with People. Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson, and Ross.
    1. Hester Randolph Jr..
    1985. Selling landstyle and lifescape for economic recovery: 12 steps to community development. Landscape Architecture 75 (1): 78–85.
    OpenUrl
    1. Hester Randolph Jr..
    2006. Design for Ecological Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    1. Higgins Tanya,
    2. Duane Timothy
    . 2008. Incorporating complex adaptive systems theory into strategic planning: The Sierra Nevada Conservancy. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 51 (1): 141–162.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Hise Greg
    . 1997. Magnetic Los Angeles: Planning the Twentieth-Century Metropolis. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    1. Hise Greg,
    2. Deverell William
    . 2000. Eden by Design: The 1930 Olmsted-Bartholomew Regional Plan for the Los Angeles Region. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    1. Kondolf G. Mathias,
    2. Yang Chianing
    . 2008. Planning river restoration projects: social and cultural dimensions. In River Restoration: Managing the Uncertainty in Restoring Physical Habitat, ed. Darby Stephen, Sear David, 41–60. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley and Sons.
    1. Landscape Architecture Magazine
    . 1987. Runyon Canyon master plan and design guidelines. Landscape Architecture Magazine 77 (6): 60–63.
    OpenUrl
    1. Lynch Kevin
    . 1960. The Image of the City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    1. MacAdams Lewis
    . 2005. The River: Books One, Two and Three. Santa Cruz, CA: Blue Press.
    1. MacAdams Lewis
    . 2006. Personal conversation.
    1. McNally Marcia
    . 1995. Making Big Wild. Places 9 (3): 38–45.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
    1. McNally Marcia
    . 2002. Investigating the Neighborhood Landscape: A Field Guide for Knowing and Planning for Change in Your Neighborhood. Guidebook, Department of Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning. Berkeley: University of California.
    1. McNally Marcia
    . 2003. Kyoto Urban Rivers. Research report, Department of Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning. Berkeley: University of California.
    1. McNally Marcia
    . 2004. Taipei Riparian Open Space. Research report, Department of Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning. Berkeley: University of California.
    1. Morrison Patt,
    2. Lamonica Mark
    . 2001. Rio L.A.: Tales from the Los Angeles River. Santa Monica, CA: Angel City Press.
    1. Orr David
    . 1992. Ecological Literacy: Education and the Transition to a Postmodern World. Albany: State University of New York Press.
    1. Perry Clarence
    . 1929. The neighborhood unit: A scheme of arrangement for the family-life community. In Regional Survey of New York and Its Environs, Vol. 7, of Neighborhood and Community Planning, 22–140. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
    OpenUrl
    1. Price Jenny
    . 2005. Thirteen ways of seeing nature in L.A. In Land of Sunshine: an Environmental History of Metropolitan Los Angeles, ed. Deverell William, Hise Greg, 220–244. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
    1. Putnam Robert
    . 1995. Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy (6) 1: 65–78.
    OpenUrl
    1. McNally Rand
    . 2002. The Thomas Guide: Los Angeles County 2003. Skokie, IL: Rand McNally.
    1. Rojas James
    . 2003. Personal conversation.
    1. Rojas James
    . 2006. The cultural landscape of a latino community. In Landscape and Race in the United States, ed. Schein Richard, 177–250. New York: Routledge.
    1. Sandercock Leonie
    . 2000. Cities of (in)difference and the challenge for planning. Documents and Information on Swiss Local, Regional, and State Planning 140 (1): 7–15.
    OpenUrl
    1. Stokols Daniel
    . 2006. Toward a science of transdisciplinary action research. American Journal of Community Psychology 38 (1–2): 63–77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Thering Sue
    . 2007. Get Meta / Stay Grounded: Exploring the Implications of the Science of Transdisciplinary Action Research for Theory, Practice, Methods, and Pedagogy in Landscape Architecture. Unpublished manuscript.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Landscape Journal: 30 (1)
Landscape Journal
Vol. 30, Issue 1
20 Mar 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Landscape Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Nature Big and Small
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Landscape Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Landscape Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Nature Big and Small
Marcia J. McNally
Landscape Journal Mar 2011, 30 (1) 19-34; DOI: 10.3368/lj.30.1.19

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Nature Big and Small
Marcia J. McNally
Landscape Journal Mar 2011, 30 (1) 19-34; DOI: 10.3368/lj.30.1.19
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Leveling the Landscape: Landscape Performance as a Green Infrastructure Evaluation Tool for Service-Learning Products
  • The Scholarship of Transdisciplinary Action Research: Toward a New Paradigm for the Planning and Design Professions
  • Transdisciplinary Action Research in Landscape Architecture and Planning: Prospects and Challenges
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A Tribute to Robert B. Riley 1931–2019
  • Fluid or Fixed? Processes that Facilitate or Constrain a Sense of Inclusion in Participatory Schoolyard and Park Design
  • Diversity and Inclusion by Design: A Challenge for Us All
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Nature
  • scale
  • adaptive planning
  • listening
UW Press logo

© 2026 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire