The Scholarship of Transdisciplinary Action Research

REFERENCES

1. 1. Berger Peter,
   2. Thomas Luckmann

   1966.The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor.
2. 1. Bondas Terese,
   2. Hall Elizabeth O.C.

   2007. Challenges in approaching metasynthesis research. Qualitative Health Research 17 (1): 113–121.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
3. 1. Bowns Caru

   2011. Advancing transdisciplinary action research in rural Pennsylvania: The case for plural design in the Susquehanna River towns. Landscape Journal 30 (1): 88–105.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
4. 1. Brown Kyle D.,
   2. Jennings Todd

   2003. Social consciousness and landscape architecture education: Toward a conceptual framework. Landscape Journal 22 (2): 99–112.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
5. 1. Bruffee Kenneth

   1999. Collaborative Learning: Higher Education, Interdependence and the Authority of Knowledge. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
6. 1. Carlson Christine M.,
   2. Koepke John A.,
   3. Hanson Mirja P.

   2011. From pits and piles to lakes and landscapes: Rebuilding Minnesota’s industrial landscape using a transdisciplinary approach. Landscape Journal 30 (1): 35–52.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
7. 1. Chanse Victoria

   2011. Contexts and complexities: A case study in evolving participatory watershed stewardship. Landscape Journal 30 (1): 121–132.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
8. 1. Cosgrove Dennis

   1984. Social formation and Symbolic Landscape. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
9. 1. Crewe Katherine,
   2. Forsyth Anne

   2003. LandSCAPES: A typology of approaches to landscape architecture. Landscape Journal 22 (1): 37–50.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
10. 1. Deming Elen,
    2. Palmer James

    2005. Editors’ introduction. Landscape Journal 24 (2) iv–vi.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
11. 1. Doble Cheryl,
    2. King Maren

    2011. Plural planning at multiple scales: From local communities to statewide change. Landscape Journal 30 (1): 72–87.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
12. 1. Espanosa Judith,
    2. Michelle Perrault

    , eds. 1997. Public Linkage, Dialogue, and Education: Task Force Report. Washington, DC: President’s Council on Sustainable Development.
13. 1. Estabrooks Carole A.,
    2. Field Peggy Anne,
    3. Morse Janice M.

    1994. Aggregating qualitative findings: An approach to theory development. Qualitative Health Research 4 (4): 503–511.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
14. 1. Habermas Jurgen

    1970. Toward a theory of communicative competence. In Recent Sociology No. 2: Patterns of Communicative Behavior, ed. Dreitzel Hans Peter, 115–130. New York: Macmillan.
15. 1. Hester Randolph

    1999. A refrain with a view. Places 12 (2): 12–25.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
16. 1. Hou Jeff,
    2. Mark Francis,
    3. Nathan Brightbill

    , eds. 2005. Reconstructing Communities: Design Participation in the Face of Change. Davis: Center for Design Research, University of California, Davis.
17. 1. Kant Immanuel

    . 1902. The Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Meiklejohn John. New York: Collier and Son.
18. 1. Kuhn Thomas S.

    1962.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. 1. Lakatos Imre

    . 1977. The Methodology Of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers, Vol. 1, ed. Worrall John, Currie Gregory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. 1. Lakatos Imre,
    2. Musgrave Allan

    . 1970. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
21. 1. Lang Jon

    . 1987. Creating Architectural Theory: The Role of Behavioral Sciences in Environmental Design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
22. 1. McNally Marcia J.

    2011. Nature big and small: Landscape planning in the wilds of Los Angeles. Landscape Journal 30 (1): 19–34.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
23. 1. Merriam-Webster

    . 2008. Online Dictionary. http://www.merriam-webster.com [August 26, 2010].
24. 1. Noblit George W.,
    2. Dwight Hare R.

    1988. Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies, Qualitative Research Methods Series 11. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25. 1. Paterson Barbara,
    2. Sally Thorne,
    3. Connie Canam,
    4. Jillings Carol

    . 2001. Meta-Study of Qualitative Health Research: A Practical Guide to Meta-Analysis and Meta-Synthesis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. 1. Poulter Jim

    . Research and theory building functions of heuristic case practice. Australian Social Work 56 (4): 318–328.
27. 1. Rios Michael

    . 2005. Multiple publics, urban design, and the right to the city. In Reconstructing Communities: Design Participation in the Face of Change, ed. Hou Jeff, Francis Mark, Brightbill Nathan, 122–127. Davis: Center for Design Research, University of California, Davis.
28. 1. Rios Michael

    . 2011. Toward a social ecology of scale: Collective action, community design, and landscape praxis. Landscape Journal 30 (1): 106–120.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
29. 1. Robinson Nicholas

    , ed. 1993. Agenda 21: Earth’s Action Plan. New York: Oceana.
30. 1. Robson Colin

    . 2002. Real World Research. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
31. 1. Rosenfield Patricia

    . 1992. The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. Social Science and Medicine 35 (11): 1343–1357.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
32. 1. Schon Donald

    . 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
33. 1. Schraw Gregory,
    2. Dennison Rayne

    . 1994. Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology 19 (4): 460–475.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
34. 1. Schroth Olaf,
    2. Wissen Ulrike,
    3. Lange Eckart,
    4. Sheppard Stephen R. J.,
    5. Schmid Willy A.

    2011. A multiple-case study of landscape visualizations as a tool in transdisciplinary planning workshops. Landscape Journal 30 (1): 53–71.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
35. 1. Simon Herbert

    . 1990. Invariants of human behavior. Annual Review of Psychology 41: 1–20.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. 1. Stern Phyllis,
    2. Harris Chandis

    . 1985. Women’s health and the self-care paradox: A model to guide self-care readiness. Health Care for Women International 6 (1–3): 151–163

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
37. 1. Strauss Anselm,
    2. Corbin Juliet

    . 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research. London: Sage
38. 1. Stanovich Keith,
    2. Topla Maggie,
    3. West Richard F.

    2008. The development of rational thought: A taxonomy of heuristics and biases. Advances in Child Development and Behavior 36: 251–285.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. 1. Stokols Daniel

    . 2006. Toward a science of transdisciplinary research. American Journal of Community Psychology 38 (1–2): 63–77.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
40. 1. Thering Susan

    . 2007. Get Meta /Stay Grounded: Exploring the Implications of Transdisciplinary Action Research for the Planning and Design Professions. Unpublished paper submitted to Landscape Journal, parts of which are included in Thering with Chanse (2011) and in Thering (2011).
41. 1. Thering Sue,
    2. Doble Cheryl

    . 2000. Theory and practice in sustainability: Building a ladder of community focused education and outreach. Landscape Journal 19 (1–2): 191–200.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
42. 1. Thering Susan

    . 2011. A methodology for a scholarship of trans-disciplinary action research in the design professions: Lessons from an Indian Country initiative. Landscape Journal 30 (1): 133–147.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
43. 1. Walsh Denis,
    2. Downe Soo

    . 2005. Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: A literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 50 (2): 204–211.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
44. 1. Weiss Edith

    . 1990. Our rights and obligations to future generations for the environment. American Journal of International Law 84 (1): 198–207

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
45. 1. Zimmer Lela

    . 2006. Qualitative meta-synthesis: a question of dialoguing with texts. Journal of Advanced Nursing 53 (3): 311–318.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science