Editors’ Introduction

REFERENCES

1. Brundtland Commission. 1987. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. http://www.un-documents.net/wced-ocf.htm [April 19, 2011].
2. City of New York Parks and Recreation. 2011. High Performance Landscape Guidelines: 21st Century Parks for NYC. New York: City of New York Parks and Recreation.
3. 1. Jordan Nicholas R.,
   2. Schively Slotterback Carissa,
   3. Valentine Cadieux K.,
   4. Mulla David J,
   5. Pitt David G.,
   6. Olabisi Laura D.,
   7. Kim Jin-Oh

   . 2011. TMDL implementation in agricultural landscapes: A communicative and systemic approach. Environmental Management (in press).
4. 1. Klein Jeffrey A.,
   2. Wolf Steven A.

   2007. Toward multifunctional landscapes: Cross-sectional analysis of management priorities in New York’s northern forest. Rural Sociology 72 (3): 391–417.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. 1. Lagendijk Arnoud,
   2. Wisserhof Johan

   . 1999. Meer ruimte voor kennis. Verkenning van de kennisinfrastructuur voor Meervoudig Ruimtegebruik. (Give knowledge to space, give space to knowledge, part 1: Exploration of knowledge infrastructure for multifunctional land use) Series, Part 1, RMNO Report 136. Den Haag, The Netherlands: NLRO.
6. Landscape Architecture Foundation. 2011. The Landscape Performance Series Benefits Toolkit. http://lafoundation.org/research/landscape-performance-series/toolkit/ [April 18, 2011].
7. 1. Lange Eckhart

   . 2008. Our shared landscape: Design, planning and management of multifunctional landscapes. Journal of Environmental Management 89 (3): 143–145.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 1. Lovell Sarah T.,
   2. Johnston Douglas M

   . 2009. Creating multifunctional landscapes: how can the field of ecology inform the design of the landscape? Frontiers in Ecology and Environment 7(4): 212–220.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. 1. Lyle John T.

   1985. The alternating current of design process. Landscape Journal 4 (1): 7–13.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
10. 1. McCarthy James

    . 2005. Rural geography: Multifunctional rural geographies—reactionary or radical? Progress in Human Geography 29 (6): 773–782.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
11. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Living beyond Our Means: Natural Assets and Human Well-being. Statement of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Board of Directors. http://www.maweb.org/documents/document.429.aspx.pdf [April 18, 2011].
12. 1. Musacchio Laura R.

    2009. The ecology and culture of landscape sustainability: Emerging knowledge and innovation in landscape research and practice. Landscape Ecology 24 (8): 989–992.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. 1. Nassauer Joan I.,
    2. Opdam Paul

    . 2008. Design in science: extending the landscape ecology paradigm. Landscape Ecology 23 (1): 633–644.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. 1. Naveh Zed

    . 2001. Ten major premises for a holistic conception of multifunctional landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 57 (3–4): 269–284.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. 1. Neitsch Susan,
    2. Arnold Jeffrey G,
    3. Kiniry James R.,
    4. Srinivasan Raghavan,
    5. Williams Jimmy R.

    . 2010. Soil and Water Assessment Tool Input / Output File Documentation Version 2009: Texas Water Resources Institute Technical Report 365. College Station, TX: Texas Water Resources Institute and Texas A&M University.
16. 1. O’ Farrell Patrick,
    2. Anderson Pippin M. L.

    2010. Sustainable multifunctional landscapes: a review to implementation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2 (1–2): 59–65.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. 1. Otte Annette,
    2. Simmering Dietmar,
    3. Wolters Volkmar

    . 2007. Biodiversity at the landscape level: Recent concepts and perspectives for multifunctional land use. Landscape Ecology 22 (5): 639–642.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. 1. Priemus Hugo

    . 2001. Multiple space use: stimulants and obstacles. Open House International 26 (4): 24–28.

    OpenUrl
19. 1. Priemus Hugo,
    2. Rodenburg Caroline A.,
    3. Nijkamp Peter

    . 2004. Multifunctional urban land use: A new phenomenon? A new planning challenge? Built Environment 30 (4): 269–273.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
20. 1. Rodenburg Caroline A.,
    2. Nijkamp Peter

    . 2004. Multifunctional land use in the city: A typological overview. Built Environment 30 (4): 274–288.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
21. 1. Slee Bill

    . 2009. Re-imagining forests as multifunctional and sustainable resources for a low carbon rural economy: The potential for forest-based rural development. Paper presented at Developing Rural Policies to Meet the Needs of a Changing World, sponsored by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Quebec, Canada. October 13–15, 2009.
22. 1. Tress Barbel,
    2. Tress Gunther,
    3. Décamps Henri,
    4. d’Hauteserre Anne-Marie

    . 2001. Bridging human and natural sciences in landscape research. Landscape and Urban Planning 57 (3–4): 137–141.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
23. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 2011. Brownfields and Land Revitalization. http://www.epa.gov/brownfields/partners/emscher.html [April 30, 2011].
24. 1. Wiggering Hubert,
    2. Dalchowa Claus,
    3. Glemnitz Michael,
    4. Helming Katharina,
    5. Müller Klaus,
    6. Schultz Alfred,
    7. Stachowa Ulrich,
    8. Zander Peter

    . 2006. Indicators for multifunctional land use—Linking socio-economic requirements with landscape potentials. Ecological Indicators 6 (1): 238–239.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. 1. Williams Byron K.,
    2. Szaro Robert C.,
    3. Shapiro Carl D.

    2009. Adaptive Management: The US Department of the Interior Technical Guide. Adaptive Management Working Group. Washington DC: US Department of the Interior.