Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • ASLA Research Grant
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Ecological Restoration
    • Land Economics
    • Native Plants Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Landscape Journal
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Ecological Restoration
    • Land Economics
    • Native Plants Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Landscape Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • ASLA Research Grant
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticleArticles

Teaching Stream Restoration

Experiences from Interdiscipinary Studio Instruction

G. Mathias Kondolf, Louise A. Mozingo, Karl Kullmann, Joe R. McBride and Shannah Anderson
Landscape Journal, October 2013, 32 (1) 95-112; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.32.1.95
G. Mathias Kondolf
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Louise A. Mozingo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karl Kullmann
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joe R. McBride
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shannah Anderson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

    1. Antrop Marc
    . 2003. Expectations of scientists towards interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. In Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Landscape Studies: Potential and Limitations, Delta Series 2, ed. Tress Barbel, Tress Gunther, van der Valk Arnold, Fry Gary, 44–54. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen UR, Delta Program.
    1. Brown Robert D.,
    2. Corry Robert D.
    2011. Evidence-based landscape architecture: The maturing of a profession. Landscape and Urban Planning 100(4):327–329.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Bruns Diedrich,
    2. Ortacesme Veli,
    3. Stiles Richard,
    4. de Vries Jeroen,
    5. Holden Robert,
    6. Jorgensen Karsten
    . 2010. ECLAS Guidance on Landscape Architecture Education: Tuning Landscape Architecture Education in Europe, version 26. Wageningen, The Netherlands: European Council of Landscape Architecture Schools. http://www.eclas.org/public/ECLAS%20Guidance%20on%20Education.pdf [December 26, 2012].
    1. Chanse Victoria,
    2. Yang Chia-Ning
    . 2005. The importance of being engaged: The role of community participation in urban creek stewardship. In (Re)constructing Communities: Design Participation in the Face of Change, ed. Jeffrey Hou, Francis Mark, Brightbill Nathan, 243–248. Davis, CA: Univ. of California Center for Design Research.
    1. Davis Barbara Gross
    . 2001. Tools for Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
    1. Downs Peter,
    2. Gregory Ken
    . 2004. River Channel Management: Towards Sustainable Catchment Hydrosystems. London: Arnold.
  1. FISRWG (Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group). 1998. Stream Corridor Restoration: Principles, Processes, and Practices.
    1. Gazvoda Davorin
    . 2002. Characteristics of modern landscape architecture and its education. Landscape and Urban Planning 60(2):117–133.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Gobster Paul
    . 2000. Restoring nature: human actions, interactions, and reactions. In Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities, ed. Gobster Paul H., Bruce Hull R., 1–20. Covelo, California: Island Press.
    1. Gorman Michael,
    2. Kagiwada Julia
    . 1995. Invention, design, and discovery: A transdisciplinary quest. New Literary History 26(3):627–640.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Hester Randolph
    . 2006. Design for Ecological Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    1. Hill Kristina,
    2. White Denis,
    3. Maupin Miranda,
    4. Ryder Barbara,
    5. Karr James R.,
    6. Freemark Kathryn,
    7. Taylor Rebecca,
    8. Schauman Sally
    . 2002. In expectation of relationships: centering theories around ecological understanding. In Ecology and Design: Frameworks for Learning, ed. Johnson Bart R., Hill Kristina, 271–303. Washington, DC: Island Press.
    1. Kadri Jamal
    . 2012. “Green Streets: An Interview with Clark Wilson.” http://water.epa.gov/type/watersheds/outreach/transcript_greenstreets.cfm [September 12, 2012].
    1. Kondolf G. Mathias,
    2. Yang Chia-Ning
    . 2008. Planning river restoration projects: Social and cultural dimensions. In River Restoration: Managing the Uncertainty in Restoring Physical Habitat, ed. Sear David, Darby Steve, 43–60. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
    1. Kondolf G. Mathias,
    2. Anderson Shannah,
    3. Lave Rebecca,
    4. Pagano Laura,
    5. Merelender Adina,
    6. Bernhardt Emily
    . 2007. Two decades of river restoration in California: What can we learn? Restoration Ecology 15(3): 51–523.
    OpenUrl
    1. Kondolf G. Mathias,
    2. Anderson Shannah D.,
    3. Storesund Rune,
    4. Tompkins Mark,
    5. Atwood Paul
    . 2011. Post-project appraisals of river restoration in advanced university instruction. Restoration Ecology 19(6):696–700.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Mozingo Louise A.
    1997. The aesthetics of ecological design: seeing science as culture. Landscape Journal 16(1):46–59.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Mozingo Louise A.
    2005. Community Participation and Creek Restoration in the East Bay. In (Re)Constructing Communities: Design Participation in the Face of Change, ed. Hou Jeff, Francis Mark, Brightbill Nathan, 249–251. Davis, California: Center for Environmental Design Research.
    1. Nassauer Joan I.
    2002. Ecological science and landscape design: a necessary relationship in changing landscapes. In Ecology and Design: Frameworks for Learning, ed. Johnson Bart R., Hill Kristina, 217–230. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  2. Natural Heritage Institute (NHI). 2002. Envisioning Brentwood’s Creeks: A Green Resource for the Future. San Francisco: Natural Heritage Institute. http://www.n-h-i.org/uploads/tx_rtgfiles/2322_brentwoodscreeks.pdf [August 18, 2012].
    1. Perrow Martin R.,
    2. Davy Anthony J.
    , eds. 2002. Handbook of Ecological Restoration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    1. Portland Metro
    . 2002. Green Streets: Innovative Solutions for Stormwater and Stream Crossings. Portland: Portland Metro.
    1. Samkien Karineh
    . 2006. Environmental Program Analyst at City of San Pablo, personal communication.
    1. Schmidt John C.
    , 2008, The future of short courses and university programs. The Stream Restoration Networker. Minneapolis, MN: National Center for Earth-Surface Dynamics, 2(1): 5–7.
    OpenUrl
    1. Stokols Daniel
    . 2011. Transdisciplinary action research in landscape architecture and planning: Prospects and challenges. Landscape Journal 30(1):1–5.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Tamminga Ken,
    2. Mozingo Louise,
    3. Erickson Donna,
    4. Harrington John
    . 2002. Interweaving Ecology in Design and Planning Curricula. In Ecology and Design: Frameworks for Learning, ed. Johnson Bart R., Hill Kristina, 357–395. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  3. University of California at Berkeley (UCB). 1996. Re-envisioning San Leandro Creek (Report to the Park Commission and City Council of San Leandro by the class of Landscape Architecture 201). Berkeley: University of California Berkeley, Department of Landscape Architecture.
    1. Windhager Steven,
    2. Steiner Frederick,
    3. Simmons Mark T.,
    4. Heymann David
    . 2010. Toward ecosystem services as a basis for design. Landscape Journal 29(2):107–123.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Wohl Ellen,
    2. Angermeier Paul L.,
    3. Bledsoe Brian,
    4. Mathias Kondolf G.,
    5. MacDonnell Lee,
    6. Merritt David M.,
    7. Palmer Margaret A.,
    8. Leroy Poff N.,
    9. Tarboton David
    . 2005. River restoration. Water Resources Research 41, W10301, doi:10.1029/2005WR003985.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Landscape Journal: 32 (1)
Landscape Journal
Vol. 32, Issue 1
23 Oct 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Landscape Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Teaching Stream Restoration
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Landscape Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Landscape Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Teaching Stream Restoration
G. Mathias Kondolf, Louise A. Mozingo, Karl Kullmann, Joe R. McBride, Shannah Anderson
Landscape Journal Oct 2013, 32 (1) 95-112; DOI: 10.3368/lj.32.1.95

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Teaching Stream Restoration
G. Mathias Kondolf, Louise A. Mozingo, Karl Kullmann, Joe R. McBride, Shannah Anderson
Landscape Journal Oct 2013, 32 (1) 95-112; DOI: 10.3368/lj.32.1.95
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Novel Landscapes: Challenges and Opportunities for Educating Future Ecological Designers and Restoration Practitioners
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A Tribute to Robert B. Riley 1931–2019
  • Fluid or Fixed? Processes that Facilitate or Constrain a Sense of Inclusion in Participatory Schoolyard and Park Design
  • Diversity and Inclusion by Design: A Challenge for Us All
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Stream restoration
  • transdisciplinary investigation
  • studio instruction
UW Press logo

© 2025 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire