Multifunctional Wastewater Treatment Landscapes

REFERENCES

1. 1. Ávila Cristina,
   2. Pedescoll Anna,
   3. Matamoros Víctor,
   4. María Bayona Josep,
   5. García Joan

   . 2010. Capacity of a horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland system for the removal of emerging pollutants: An injection experiment. Chemosphere 81(9): 1137–1142. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.08.006.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 1. Bachand Philip A.M.,
   2. Horne Alexander J.

   1999. Denitrification in constructed free-water surface wetlands: II. Effects of vegetation and temperature. Ecological Engineering 14(1–2) (September): 17–32. doi:10.1016/S0925-8574(99)00017-8.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. 1. Blumberg Engineers

   . 2003. Constructed wetlands as a vertical subsurface flow reed bed treatment system in Northern China. http://www.blumberg-engineers.com/PDF/Shenyang_reed_bed_treatment_system.pdf [April 15, 2013].
4. 1. Bomans Kirsten,
   2. Steenberghen Thérèse,
   3. Dewaelheyns Valerie,
   4. Leinfelder Hans,
   5. Gulinck Hubert

   . 2010. Underrated transformations in the open space—The case of an urbanized and multifunctional area. Landscape and Urban Planning 94(3–4): 196–205. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.10.004.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. 1. Brix Hans

   . 1998. Denmark. In Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment in Europe, ed. Vyamazal Jan, Brix Hans, Cooper Paul F., Green Michel, Haberl Raimund, 123–152. Leiden, The Netherlands: Backhuys Publishers.
6. 1. Brix Hans,
   2. Koottatep Thammarat,
   3. Fryd Ole,
   4. Laugesen Carsten H.

   2011. The flower and the butterfly constructed wetland system at Koh Phi Phi—System design and lessons learned during implementation and operation. Ecological Engineering 37(5): 729–735. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.06.035.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. 1. Burka U.,
   2. Lawrence P.C.

   1990. A new community approach to waste treatment with higher water plants. In Constructed Wetlands in Water Pollution Control, ed. Cooper Paul F., Findlater B.C., 359–371 Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
8. 1. Catterall C.

   2009. Responses of Faunal Assemblages to Urbanisation. In Ecology of Cities and Towns: A Compatrative Approach, ed. McDonnel Mark, Hahs Amy, Bresuste Jurgen, 129–155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. 1. Cooper Paul F.

   2009. What can we learn from old wetlands? Lessons that have been learned and some that may have been forgotten over the past 20 years. Desalination 246(1–3): 11–26.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. 1. Duerksen Christopher,
    2. Hobbs N. Thompson,
    3. Elliott Donald L.,
    4. Johnson Erin,
    5. Miller James R.

    1998. Managing Development for People and Wildlife: A Handbook for Habitat Protection by Local Government. Denver, CO: Clarion Associates and Colorado Division of Wildlife.
11. 1. Feest Alan,
    2. Merrill Ian,
    3. Aukett Philippa

    . 2012. Does botanical diversity in sewage treatment reed-bed sites enhance invertebrate biodiversity? International Journal of Ecology 1: 1–9 doi:10.1155/2012/324295.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. 1. Fernández-Juricic Esteban,
    2. Jimenez Maria Dolores,
    3. Lucas Elena

    . 2001. Bird tolerance to human disturbance in urban parks of Madrid (Spain): Management implications. In Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World, ed. Marzluff John, Bowman Reed, Donnelly Roarke, 259–274. New York: Springer Science+Business.
13. 1. Fleming-Singer Maia S.,
    2. Horne Alexander J.

    2006. Balancing wildlife needs and nitrate removal in constructed wetlands: The case of the Irvine Ranch Water District’s San Joaquin Wildlife Sanctuary. Ecological Engineering 26(2): 147–166. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.09.010.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. 1. Gaboutloeloe Gilbert Kabelo,
    2. Chen Shulin,
    3. Barber Michael E.,
    4. Stöckle Claudio O.

    2009. Combinations of horizontal and vertical flow constructed wetlands to improve nitrogen removal. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution: Focus 9(3–4): 279–286. doi:10.1007/s11267-009-9210-5.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. 1. Langergraber Guenter,
    2. Leroch Klaus,
    3. Haberl Raimund,
    4. Rohrhofer Roland

    . 2009. High-rate nitrogen removal in a two-stage subsurface vertical flow constructed wetland. Desalination 246(1–3): 55–68 doi:10.1016/j.desal.200.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. 1. Hassan Rashid M,
    2. Carpenter Steve R,
    3. Chopra Kanchan,
    4. Capistrano Doris,
    5. Millenium Ecosystem Assessment

    . 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being. Washington DC: Island Press.
17. 1. He Fangliang,
    2. Hubbell Stephen P.

    2011. Species–area relationships always overestimate extinction rates from habitat loss. Nature 473: 368–371.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 1. Hickman Scott,
    2. Mosca Vincent

    . 2002. The continuing Effectiveness of the Des Plaines River Wetlands Demonstration Project in Improving Habitat for Migrating and Nesting Birds, Technical Paper No. 9. Chicago, IL: Wetlands Research.
19. 1. Hsu Chorng-Bin,
    2. Hsieh Hwey-Lian,
    3. Yang Lei,
    4. Wu Sheng-Hai,
    5. Chang Jui-Sheng,
    6. Hsiao Shu-Chuan,
    7. Su Hui-Chen,
    8. Yeh Chao-Hsien,
    9. Ho Yi-Shen,
    10. Lin Hsing-Juh

    . 2011. Biodiversity of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Ecological Engineering 37(10) (October): 1533–1545. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.06.002.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. 1. Kadlec Robert H.,
    2. Cuvellier Craig,
    3. Stober Trent

    . 2010. Performance of the Columbia, Missouri treatment wetland. Ecological Engineering 36(5): 672–684. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.12.009.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
21. 1. Kubes Jan

    . 1996. Biocentres and corridors in a cultural landscape. A critical assessment of the ‘territorial system of ecological stability.’ Landscape and Urban Planning 35(4): 23l–240.

    OpenUrl
22. 1. Lancaster Roger

    , ed. 1983. Park, Recreation and Open Space Standards and Guidelines. Ashburn, VA: National Recreation and Park Association.
23. 1. Matamoros Víctor,
    2. Arias Carlos,
    3. Brix Hans,
    4. Bayona Josep M.

    2009. Preliminary screening of small-scale domestic wastewater treatment systems for removal of pharmaceutical and personal care products. Water Research 43(1): 55–62. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2008.10.005.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
24. 1. McGuckin Christopher P.,
    2. Brown Robert D.

    1995. A landscape ecological model for wildlife enhancement of stormwater management practices in urban greenways. Landscape and Urban Planning 33(1–3): 227–246. doi:10.1016/0169-2046(94)02020-G.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. 1. McKinney Richard A.,
    2. Raposa Kenneth B.,
    3. Cournoyer Rose M.

    2011. Wetlands as habitat in urbanizing landscapes: Patterns of bird abundance and occupancy. Landscape and Urban Planning 100(1–2): 144–152. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.11.015.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
26. 1. Moore Trisha L. C.,
    2. Hunt William F.

    2011. Ecosystem service provision by stormwater wetlands and ponds—A means for evaluation? Water Research 46(20): 6811–6823. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2011.11.026.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
27. 1. Murkin Henry R.,
    2. Murkin Elaine J.,
    3. Ball John P.

    1997. Avian habitat selection and prairie wetland dynamics: A 10-year experiment. Ecological Applications 7(4): 1144–1159. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[1144:AHSAPW]2.0.CO;2.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
28. 1. Ruiz Alina M.,
    2. Maerz John C.,
    3. Davis Andrew K.,
    4. Kevin Keel M.,
    5. Ferreira Andrew R.,
    6. Conroy Michael J.,
    7. Morris Lawrence A.,
    8. Fisk Aaron T.

    2010. Patterns of development and abnormalities among tadpoles in a constructed wetland receiving treated wastewater. Environmental Science & Technology 44(13): 4862–4868. doi:10.1021/es903785x.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 1. Seidel Käthe

    . 1976. Macrophytes and Water Purification. In Biological Control of Water Pollution, ed. Tourbier Joachim Toby, Pierson Robert W.,109–122. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
30. 1. The Trust for Public Land

    . 2010. The Economic Benefits of Denver’s Park and Recreation System. The Trust for Public Land. http://www.tpl.org/publications/books-reports/ccpe-publications/denver-park-value-report.html [February 15, 2013].
31. 1. Thiere Geraldine,
    2. Stadmark Johanna,
    3. Weisner Stefan E.B.

    2011. Nitrogen retention versus methane emission: Environmental benefits and risks of large-scale wetland creation. Ecological Engineering 37(1): 6–15. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.02.002.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
32. 1. Tong Chunfu,
    2. Feagin Rusty A.,
    3. Lu Jianjian,
    4. Zhang Xiufeng,
    5. Zhu Xiaojun,
    6. Wang Wei,
    7. He Wenshan

    . 2007. Ecosystem service values and restoration in the urban sanyang wetland of Wenzhou, China. Ecological Engineering 29(3): 249–258. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.03.002.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
33. 1. Tunçsiper B.

    2009. Nitrogen removal in a combined vertical and horizontal subsurface-flow constructed wetland system. Desalination 247(1–3): 466–475. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2009.03.003.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
34. 1. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

    . 1993. The Des Plaines Wetlands Project: Wetlands for River Water Quality Improvement, EPA 833-R-93-005q. US Environmental Protection Agency. www.epa.gov/nscep/index.html. [March 25, 2013]
35. 1. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

    . 2010. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Writers’ Manual, EPA-833-K-10-001. http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/writermanual.cfm [April 15, 2013].
36. 1. Vohla Christina,
    2. Kõiv Margit,
    3. John Bavor H.,
    4. Chazarenc Florent,
    5. Mander Ülo

    . 2011. Filter materials for phosphorus removal from wastewater in treatment wetlands—A review. Ecological Engineering 37(1): 70–89. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.08.003.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
37. 1. Vymazal Jan

    . 2005. Horizontal sub-surface flow and hybrid constructed wetlands systems for wastewater treatment. Ecological Engineering 25: 478–490.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
38. 1. Vymazal Jan

    . 2011a. Long-term performance of constructed wetlands with horizontal sub-surface flow: Ten case studies from the Czech Republic. Ecological Engineering 37(1): 54–63. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.11.028.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
39. 1. Vymazal Jan

    . 2011b. Enhancing ecosystem services on the landscape with created, constructed and restored wetlands. Ecological Engineering 37(1): 1–5. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.07.031.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
40. 1. Vymazal Jan

    . 2011c. Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: Five decades of experience. Environmental Science & Technology 45 (1) (January): 61–69. doi:10.1021/es101403q.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
41. 1. Vymazal Jan,
    2. Kröpfelová Lenka

    . 2011. A three-stage experimental constructed wetland for treatment of domestic sewage: First 2 years of operation. Ecological Engineering 37(1): 90–98. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.03.004.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
42. 1. Wallace Scott D.,
    2. Knight Robert Lee

    . 2006. Small-Scale Constructed Wetland Treatment Systems: Feasibility, Design Criteria, and Requirements. London: Water Environment Research Publishing.
43. 1. Zapater M.,
    2. Gross A.,
    3. Soares M. I. M.

    2011. Capacity of an on-site recirculating vertical flow constructed wetland to withstand disturbances and highly variable influent quality. Ecological Engineering 37(10): 1572–1577. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.03.033.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
44. 1. Zhu Si-Xi,
    2. Ge Han-Liang,
    3. Ge Ying,
    4. Cao Hai-Qin,
    5. Liu Dong,
    6. Chang Jie,
    7. Zhang Chong-Bang,
    8. Gu Bao-Jing,
    9. Chang Scott-X

    . 2010. Effects of plant diversity on biomass production and substrate nitrogen in a subsurface vertical flow constructed wetland. Ecological Engineering 36(10): 1307–1313. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.06.007.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science