Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • ASLA Research Grant
  • Other Publications
    • UWP

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Landscape Journal
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Landscape Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • ASLA Research Grant
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticleArticles

An Inductive Model of Farmer Conservation Decision Making for Nitrogen Management

Bjorn Olson and Mae A. Davenport
Landscape Journal, January 2017, 36 (1) 59-73; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.36.1.59
Bjorn Olson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mae A. Davenport
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

This study explores the drivers of and constraints to conservation decision making and practice adoption among agricultural producers in two impaired Minnesota watersheds in the Upper Mississippi River Basin. Concerns about nutrient management and non-point source nitrogen loading in the region prompted the study. Data were gathered through in-depth interviews with 30 farmers operating in the watersheds. Qualitative data analysis revealed multiple interacting drivers and constraints to conservation decision making and supported an inductive conceptual model anchored in three spheres of decision making: farming ethic, conservation practice appraisal, and conservation action. Finer descriptive analysis focused on the first two spheres revealed varying beliefs, levels of focus, and saliency involving dynamic thought processes of conservation decision making. Farming ethic encompassed multiple dimensions of farmer identity and values, social norms of farm management, and personal norms of conservation action. Appraisal dimensions were tied to resources, practice efficacy, risk and uncertainty, and autonomy. The model will enable policy makers and resource managers to better plan, design and manage conservation policies and programs. Study findings can inform nutrient management and enable better alignment with farmer decision-making processes.

  • Water resource conservation
  • agriculture
  • best management practices
  • nitrogen
  • © 2017 by the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Landscape Journal: 36 (1)
Landscape Journal
Vol. 36, Issue 1
1 Jan 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Landscape Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
An Inductive Model of Farmer Conservation Decision Making for Nitrogen Management
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Landscape Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Landscape Journal web site.
Citation Tools
An Inductive Model of Farmer Conservation Decision Making for Nitrogen Management
Bjorn Olson, Mae A. Davenport
Landscape Journal Jan 2017, 36 (1) 59-73; DOI: 10.3368/lj.36.1.59

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
An Inductive Model of Farmer Conservation Decision Making for Nitrogen Management
Bjorn Olson, Mae A. Davenport
Landscape Journal Jan 2017, 36 (1) 59-73; DOI: 10.3368/lj.36.1.59
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • An inductive framework of self-efficacy to understand and support farmers in conservation agriculture
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A Tribute to Robert B. Riley 1931–2019
  • A Tribute to Pat Dwayne Taylor, PhD, FASLA, FCELA (July 7, 1944–September 8, 2018)
  • Designing the Correctional Landscape: An Invitation to Landscape Architecture Professionals
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Water resource conservation
  • agriculture
  • best management practices
  • nitrogen
UWP

© 2023 Landscape Journal

Powered by HighWire