Environmental Design, Systems Thinking, and Human Agency: McHarg’s Ecological Method and Steinitz and Rogers’s Interdisciplinary Education Experiment

REFERENCES

1. ↵
   1. Alexander Christopher

   . 1964. Notes on the Synthesis of Form. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
2. ↵
   1. Auger Boyd

   . 1972. The Architect and the Computer. London: Pall Mall Press
3. ↵
   1. Austin Steve

   . 2017. Can we get to zero? Landscape Architecture Magazine (June 8) https://landscapearchitecturemagazine.org/tag/zero-carbon/ (accessed August 14, 2017).
4. 1. Belknap Raymond K.,
   2. Furtado John G,
   3. and the Conservation Foundation

   . 1967. Three Approaches to Environmental Resource Analysis. Washington, DC: Conservation Foundation
5. ↵
   1. Bijker Wiebe E.,
   2. Hughes Thomas P.,
   3. Pinch Trevor

   1987. The Social Constructions of Technological Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
6. 1. Cantrell Bradley,
   2. Michaels Wes

   . 2010. Digital Drawing for Landscape Architecture: Contemporary Techniques and Tools for Digital Representation in Site Design. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
7. 1. Cardoso Daniel

   . 2015. Builders of the Vision: Software and the Imagination of Design. New York: Routledge
8. ↵
   1. Carlsson Moa

   . 2016. Ecology, Health and Cybernetic Visions: McHarg’s X-rays of the Environmental Body (1956–1969). Proceedings BEYOND ISM: The Landscape of Landscape Urbanism. Alnarp, Sweden, October 19–21: 21–27.
9. ↵
   1. Carpo Mario

   . 2012. The Digital Turn in Architecture 1992–2012. London: Wiley
10. ↵
    1. Chrisman Nick

    . 2006. Charting the Unknown: How Computer Graphics at Harvard Became GIS. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press
11. ↵
    1. Conan Michel

    . 2000. Environmentalism in Landscape Architecture. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection
12. ↵
    1. Cross Nigel

    . 1972. Design Participation: Proceedings of the Design Research Society’s Conference, Manchester, September 1971. London: Academy Editions
13. ↵
    1. Cross Nigel

    . 2011. Design Thinking: Understanding How Designers Think and Work. London: Bloomsbury
14. 1. Darling F. Fraser,
    2. Milton John P.

    , eds. 1967. Future Environments of North America. Garden City, NY: Natural History Press
15. ↵
    1. Degelman L. O

    . 1969. Introductory Manual for Synagraphic Computer Mapping: “SYMAP,” Version 5, PSU Modification 3. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University.
16. ↵
    1. Eastman Charles M

    . 1975. The use of computers instead of drawings in building design. American Institute of Architects Journal (March): 46–50.
17. ↵
    1. Friedman Yona

    . 1975. Toward a Scientific Architecture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
18. ↵
    1. Harley Brian J

    . 1988. Maps, knowledge and power. In The Iconography of Landscape, ed. Cosgrove Denis, Daniels Steven, 277–312. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. ↵
    1. Hansen Andrea

    . 2012. From hand to land: Tracing procedural artifacts in the built landscape. Landscape Urbanism (Autumn): 25.
20. ↵
    1. Herrington Susan

    . 2010. The nature of Ian McHarg’s science. Landscape Journal 20(1): 1–20.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Hopkins Lewis D

    . 1977. Methods for generating land suitability maps: A comparative evaluation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 43(4): 386–400.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. ↵
    1. Hutchinson Evelyn G

    . 1948. Circular causal systems in ecology. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 50: 221–246.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. ↵
    1. Keller Sean

    . 2018. Automatic Architecture: Motivating Form After Modernism. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press
24. ↵
    1. Latham Alan

    . 2000. Urban renewal, heritage planning and the remaking of an inner-city suburb: A case study of heritage planning in Auckland. New Zealand Planning Practice and Research 15(4): 285–298.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Leopold Aldo

    . 1949. A Sand County Almanac. Chicago: Ballantine Books
26. ↵
    1. Light Jennifer S

    . 2003. From Warfare to Welfare: Defense Intellectuals and Urban Problems in Cold War America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press
27. ↵
    1. Light Jennifer S

    . 2008. Taking games seriously. Technology and Culture 49(2): 347–375.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
28. ↵
    1. Lystra Margot

    . 2014. McHarg’s Entropy, Halprin’s Chance: Representations of Cybernetic Change in 1960s Landscape Architecture. Studies in the History of Gardens & Designed Landscapes 34(1): 71–84.

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. March Lionel,
    2. Steadman Philip

    . 1974. The Geometry of Environment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
30. ↵
    1. Margulis Lynn,
    2. Corner James,
    3. Hawthorne Brian

    2007. Ian McHarg: Conversations with Students. New York: Princeton Architectural Press
31. ↵
    1. McHarg Ian L

    . 1967. An ecological method for landscape architecture. Landscape Architecture 57(2): 105–107. Reprinted in Theory in Landscape Architecture: A Reader, ed. Swaffield Simon, 38–43. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2002.

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    1. McHarg Ian L

    . 1969. Design with Nature. Garden City, NY: Doubleday/Natural History Press
33. ↵
    1. McHarg Ian L

    . 1997. Keynote at ESRI User Conference, San Diego Convention Center, CA, July 8–11, 1997.
34. ↵
    1. McHarg Ian L.,
    2. Steiner Frederick R.

    2006. The Essential Ian McHarg, Writings on Design and Nature. Washington, DC: Island Press
35. ↵
    1. McHarg Ian L.,
    2. Wheaton William

    . 1955. Interview with William L. C. Wheaton and Ian L. McHarg. Rockefeller Archive Center, Rockefeller Foundation records, projects, RG 1.2, series 200.R, box 456, folder 3899.
36. 1. Melosi Martin V.,
    2. Scarpino Philip V.

    , eds. 2002. Public History and the Environment. Malabar, FL: Krieger
37. ↵
    1. Meyer Elizabeth K

    . 2000. The post-Earth Day conundrum: Translating environmental values into landscape design. In Environmentalism in Landscape Architecture, ed. Conan Michel, 187–244. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks–Harvard University Press, 2001.
38. ↵
    1. Negroponte Nicholas

    , 1970. The Architecture Machine: Toward a More Human Environment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
39. ↵
    1. Pearlman Jill E

    . 2007. Inventing American Modernism: Joseph Hudnut, Walter Gropius, and the Bauhaus Legacy at Harvard. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press
40. ↵
    1. Pickering Andrew

    . 1995. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
41. ↵
    1. Picon Antoine

    . 2013. Substance and structure II: The digital culture of landscape architecture. Harvard Design Magazine no. 36.
42. ↵
    1. Simo Melanie

    . 1999. 100 Years of Landscape Architecture Some Patterns of a Century. Washington, DC: ASLA Press
43. ↵
    1. Simon Herbert A

    . 1947. Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. London: Collier Macmillan
44. ↵
    1. Spirn Anne Whiston

    . 1997. The authority of nature: Conflict and confusion in landscape architecture. In Nature and Ideology: Nature and Garden Design in the Twentieth Century, ed. Wolschke-Bulmahn Joachim, 249–261. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection.
45. ↵
    1. Spirn Anne Whiston

    . 2000. Ian McHarg, landscape architecture, and environmentalism: Ideas and methods in context. In Environmentalism in Landscape Architecture, ed. Conan Michel, 187–244. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks–Harvard University Press, 2001.
46. ↵
    1. Steenson Molly

    . 2017. Architectural Intelligence: How Designers and Architects Created the Digital Landscape. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
47. ↵
    1. Steinitz Carl F

    . 1967. Congruence and Meaning: The Influence of Consistency between Urban Form and Activity upon Environmental Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
48. ↵
    1. Steinitz Carl F

    . 1968. Meaning and the congruence of urban form and activity. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 34 (4): 233–248.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
49. ↵
    1. Steinitz Carl F

    . 2012. A Framework for Geodesign: Changing Geography by Design. Redlands, CA: Esri Press
50. ↵
    1. Steinitz Carl F

    . 2014. The beginnings of geographical information systems: A personal historical perspective. Planning Perspectives 29(2): 239–254.

    OpenUrl
51. ↵
    1. Steinitz Carl F.,
    2. Rogers Peter P.

    1968. A Systems Analysis Model of Urbanization and Change; An Experiment in Interdisciplinary Education. Cambridge, MA: Graduate School of Design, Harvard University
52. ↵
    1. Treib Marc

    ed. 2002. The Architecture of Landscape, 1940–1960. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press
53. ↵
    1. Treib Marc

    . 2008. Representing Landscape Architecture. New York: Taylor & Francis
54. ↵
    1. Walliss Jillian,
    2. Rahmann Heike

    . 2016. Landscape Architecture and Digital Technologies: Re-conceptualising design and making. New York: Routledge
55. ↵
    1. Weller Richard

    . 2015. Stewardship now? Reflections on landscape architecture’s raison d’etre in the 21st century. Landscape Journal 33(1): 85–104.

    OpenUrl
56. ↵
    1. Weller Richard,
    2. Fleming Billy

    . 2016. “Has landscape architecture failed?” Landscape Architecture Foundation News Blog, Landscape Architecture Foundation, March 21. https://lafoundation.org/news-events/blog/2016/03/21/has-landscape-architecture-failed/ (accessed July 15, 2017).
57. ↵
    1. Wiener Norbert

    . 1948. Cybernetics; or, Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. New York: Wiley
58. ↵
    1. Winner Langdon

    . 1980. Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus 109(1): 121–136.

    OpenUrl
59. ↵
    1. Young Gerald,
    2. Steiner Frederick,
    3. Brooks Kenneth,
    4. Struckmeyer Kenneth

    1983. Determining the Regional Context for Landscape Planning. Landscape Planning 10: 269–296.

    OpenUrl