Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • ASLA Research Grant
  • Other Publications
    • UWP

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Landscape Journal
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Landscape Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • ASLA Research Grant
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticleArticles

Evidence and Deception: A Historic Photo-Analysis Method for Landscape Studies

Michael W. Seymour and Peter R. Summerlin
Landscape Journal, February 2017, 36 (2) 91-109; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.36.2.91
Michael W. Seymour
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter R. Summerlin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

While historic photographs are a compelling resource and illustrate and supplement many studies, scholars of the landscape may be hesitant to draw conclusions from photographs themselves. Although the deceptive nature of photography is a substantial challenge to overcome, archival photographs can improve understanding of landscape history aspects that have received minimal scholarly attention because of limited supplemental documentation. This article offers a systematic approach to reducing this issue using a series of early photographs of Baton Rouge, Louisiana, as an instructive example. In 1901, Andrew David and Howard Lytle published 46 residential portraits in The Elks’ Souvenir of Baton Rouge. Because none of the residences photographed for the Elks’ Souvenir exist in a recognizable form today, the residences and landscapes created during this formative period of postwar industrialization and homebuilding have been largely forgotten. This article describes the extent to which these properties can be understood by reviewing the physical context using the Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps and linking them with a new photo-analysis process. The proposed process should assist researchers and practitioners in arriving at a more thorough understanding of the sites depicted in historic photographs.

  • Landscape history
  • photography
  • methodology
  • residential design
  • vernacular gardens
  • Baton Rouge
  • © 2018 by the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Landscape Journal: 36 (2)
Landscape Journal
Vol. 36, Issue 2
1 Feb 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Landscape Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evidence and Deception: A Historic Photo-Analysis Method for Landscape Studies
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Landscape Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Landscape Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Evidence and Deception: A Historic Photo-Analysis Method for Landscape Studies
Michael W. Seymour, Peter R. Summerlin
Landscape Journal Feb 2017, 36 (2) 91-109; DOI: 10.3368/lj.36.2.91

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Evidence and Deception: A Historic Photo-Analysis Method for Landscape Studies
Michael W. Seymour, Peter R. Summerlin
Landscape Journal Feb 2017, 36 (2) 91-109; DOI: 10.3368/lj.36.2.91
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A Tribute to Robert B. Riley 1931–2019
  • Fluid or Fixed? Processes that Facilitate or Constrain a Sense of Inclusion in Participatory Schoolyard and Park Design
  • Diversity and Inclusion by Design: A Challenge for Us All
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Landscape history
  • photography
  • methodology
  • residential design
  • vernacular gardens
  • Baton Rouge
UWP

© 2023 Landscape Journal

Powered by HighWire