Drawing Online: A Comparative Analysis of an Online Basic Graphics Course

REFERENCES

1. ↵
   1. Altman D. G.

   (1991). Practical statistics for medical research. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
2. ↵
   1. Anderson C

   . (2010). Presenting and evaluating qualitative research. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 74(8), article 141. doi:10.5688/aj7408141

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
3. ↵
   1. Bender D. M.

   (2005). Developing a collaborative multidisciplinary online design course. The Journal of Educators Online, 2(2), 1–12.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Bender D. M.,
   2. Vredevoogd J. D.

   (2006). Using online education technologies to support studio instruction. Educational Technology & Society, 9(4), 114–122.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Bender D. M.,
   2. Wood B. J.,
   3. Vredevoogd J. D.

   (2004). Teaching time: Distance education versus classroom instruction. American Journal of Distance Education, 18(2), 103–114. doi:10.1207/s15389286ajde1802_4

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. ↵
   1. Bishop J. L.,
   2. Verleger M. A.

   (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In ASEE National Conference Proceedings, Atlanta, GA. Retrieved from https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/20/papers/6219/download
7. ↵
   1. Broadfoot O.,
   2. Bennett R

   . (2003). Design studios: Online? Comparing traditional face-to-face design studio education with modern internet-based design studios. Paper presented at the Apple University Consortium, Wollongong, Australia.
8. ↵
   1. Brown S.,
   2. Hardaker C. H. M,
   3. Higgett N. P.

   (2000). Designs on the web: A case study of online learning for design students. Association for Learning Technology Journal, 8(1), 30–40. doi:10.1080/0968776000080104

   OpenUrlCrossRef
9. ↵
   1. Cheng N

   . (1998). Digital identity in the virtual design studio. In Proceedings of the 86th Associated Collegiate Schools of Architecture’s Annual Meeting. Cleveland, OH.
10. ↵
    1. Cohen B. H.

    (2008). Explaining Psychological Statistics. (3rd ed.) Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
11. ↵
    1. Dale J

    . (2006). A technology-based online design curriculum. In Proceedings of the Technology, Colleges and Community Worldwide Forum Conference. Manoa, HI: University of Hawaii.
12. ↵
    1. Dave B.,
    2. Danahy J

    (2000). Virtual study abroad and exchange studio. Automation in Construction, 9(1), 57–71 doi:10.1016/S0926-5805(99)00048-5

    OpenUrlCrossRef
13. ↵
    1. Davies J.,
    2. Graff M

    (2005). Performance in e-learning: Online participation and student grades. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 657–63. doi:10.1080/03054985.2011.577946

    OpenUrlCrossRef
14. ↵
    1. DeBoer J.,
    2. Ho A. D.,
    3. Stump G. S.,
    4. Breslow L

    (2014). Changing “course”: Reconceptualizing educational variables for massive open online courses. Educational Researcher, 43(2), 74–84. doi:10.3102/0013189X14523038

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. ↵
    1. Fischer G.

    (2004). Social creativity: Turning barriers into opportunities for collaborative design, In Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference: Artful integration: Interweaving media, materials and practices. Toronto, Canada. Volume 1, 152–161. doi:10.1145/1011870.1011889

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. 1. Gall M. D.,
    2. Borg W. R.,
    3. Gall J. P.

    (1996). Educational research: An introduction. (6th ed.) White Plains, NY: Longman.
17. ↵
    1. Gee J. P.

    (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. New York, NY: Routledge.
18. ↵
    1. George B. H.

    (2014). Identification of the constraints and barriers to the adoption of distributed design education. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Utah State University, Logan, UT.
19. ↵
    1. George B. H.

    (2017). A study of traditional discussion boards and social media within an online landscape architecture course. Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, 13(1), 16–25.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. George B. H.,
    2. Shelton B.,
    3. Walker A

    (2017). Barriers to the adoption of online design education within collegiate landscape architecture programmes in North America. Landscape Review, 17(1), 15–29. Retrieved from https://journals.lincoln.ac.nz/index.php/lr/article/view/1006/680 and https://journals.lincoln.ac.nz/index.php/lr/article/view/1088/771

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Ham J. J.,
    2. Schnabel M. A.

    (2011). Web 2.0 virtual design studio: Social networking as facilitator of design education. Architectural Science Review, 54(2), 108–116. doi:10.1080/00038628.2011.582369

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. ↵
    1. Hokanson B

    . (2012). The design critique as a model for distributed learning. In Moller L., Huett J. B. (Eds.), The next generation of distance education: Unconstrained learning (pp.71–83). New York, NY: Springer.
23. ↵
    1. Hutchins E

    . (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. ↵
    1. Kirkwood A.,
    2. Price L

    (2005). Learners and learning in the twenty-first century: What do we know about students’ attitudes towards and experiences of information and communication technologies that will help us design courses? Studies in Higher Education, 30(3), 257–274. doi:10.1080/03075070500095689

    OpenUrlCrossRef
25. ↵
    1. Kvan T.

    (2001). The pedagogy of virtual design studios. Automation in Construction, 10(3), 345–353. doi:10.1016/S0926-5805(00)00051-0

    OpenUrlCrossRef
26. ↵
    1. Lave J.,
    2. Wenger E

    . (1991). Situated learning and legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27. ↵
    1. Levine S. L.,
    2. Wake W. K.

    (2000). Hybrid teaching: Design studios in virtual space. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Liberal Arts and the Education of Artists. New York, NY.
28. ↵
    1. Li M.

    (2007). Lessons learned from web-enhanced teaching in landscape architecture studios. International Journal on E-Learning, 6(2), 205–212.

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Li M.,
    2. Murphy M

    (2004). Assessing the effect of supplemental web-based learning in two landscape construction courses. Landscape Review, 9(1), 157–161.

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. Maher M. L.,
    2. Bilda Z.,
    3. Gül L. F.

    (2006). Impact of collaborative virtual environments on design behavior. In Gero J. S. (Ed.), Proceedings of Design Computing and Cognition ’06 (pp.305–321). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5131-9_16

    OpenUrlCrossRef
31. ↵
    1. Matthews D.,
    2. Weigand J

    (2001). Collaborative design using the internet: A case study. Journal of Interior Design, 27(1), 45–53. doi:10.1111/j.1939-1668.2001.tb00365.x

    OpenUrlCrossRef
32. ↵
    1. Milman N. B.

    (2012). The flipped classroom strategy: What is it and how can it best be used? Distance Learning, 9(3), 85–87.

    OpenUrl
33. ↵
    1. Niculae R. L.

    (2011). The virtual architectural studio—an experiment of online cooperation. Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, 1(1), 38–46. Retrieved from http://reaser.eu/RePec/rse/wpaper/4.pdf

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Radclyffe-Thomas N.

    (2008). White heat or blue screen? Digital technology in art & design education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 27(2), 158–167. doi:10.1111/j.1476-8070.2008.00571.x

    OpenUrlCrossRef
35. ↵
    1. Saghafi M. R.,
    2. Franz J.,
    3. Crowther P

    (2012a). Perceptions of physical versus virtual design studio education. International Journal of Architectural Research, 6(1), 6–22. doi:10.26687/archnet-ijar.v6i1.74

    OpenUrlCrossRef
36. ↵
    1. Saghafi M. R.,
    2. Franz J.,
    3. Crowther P

    . (2012b). A holistic blended design studio model: A basis for exploring and expanding learning opportunities. In Resta P. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference (pp.844–852). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/39678/
37. ↵
    1. Sagun A.,
    2. Demirkan H.,
    3. Goktepe M

    (2001). A framework for the design studio in web-based education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 20(3), 332–342. doi:10.1111/1468-5949.00282

    OpenUrlCrossRef
38. ↵
    1. Schnabel M. A.,
    2. Kvan T.,
    3. Kruijff E.,
    4. Donath D

    . (2001). The First Virtual Environment Design Studio. In Penttilä H. (Ed.), Architectural Information Management, 19th eCAADe Conference Proceedings (pp. 394–400). Helsinki, Finland.
39. ↵
    1. Schön D. A.

    (1985). The design studio: An exploration of its traditions and potentials. London, UK: Royal Institute of British Architects.
40. ↵
    1. Shannon S

    . (2002). Authentic digital design learning. In Proceedings of the 36th Conference of the Australian and New Zealand Architectural Science Association (pp. 461–468). Geelong, Australia.
41. ↵
    1. Snow R. E.

    (1974). Representative and quasi-representative designs for research on teaching. Review of Educational Research, 44(3), 265–291. doi:10.3102/00346543044003265

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
42. ↵
    1. Wang T.

    (2011). Designing for designing: Information and communication technologies (ICTs) and professional education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 30(2), 188–199 doi:10.1111/j.1476-8070.2011.01675.x

    OpenUrlCrossRef