Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • ASLA Research Grant
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Ecological Restoration
    • Land Economics
    • Native Plants Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Landscape Journal
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Ecological Restoration
    • Land Economics
    • Native Plants Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Landscape Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • ASLA Research Grant
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticleArticles

Fluid or Fixed? Processes that Facilitate or Constrain a Sense of Inclusion in Participatory Schoolyard and Park Design

Angela Kreutz, Victoria Derr and Louise Chawla
Landscape Journal, January 2018, 37 (1) 39-54; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.37.1.39
Angela Kreutz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Victoria Derr
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Louise Chawla
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Bose M.,
    2. Wilson J
    . (2014). Probing impacts: Voices of community. In Bose M., Horrigan P., Doble C., Shipp S. (Eds.), Community matters (pp. 278–298). London, UK: Routledge/Earthscan.
  2. ↵
    1. Braun V.,
    2. Clarke V
    (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    1. Chawla L.
    (2015). Benefits of nature contact for children. Journal of Planning Literature, 30(4), 433–452. doi:10.1177/0885412215595441
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Chawla L.,
    2. Keena K.,
    3. Pevec I.,
    4. Stanley E
    (2014). Green schoolyards as havens from stress and resources for resilience in childhood and adolescence. Health & Place, 28, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.03.001
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    1. Deming M.E.,
    2. Swaffield S
    . (2011). Landscape architecture research: Inquiry, strategy, design. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  6. ↵
    1. Derr V.
    (2018). Urban greenspaces as participatory learning laboratories. Urban Design and Planning, 171(1), 25–33. doi:10.1680/jurdp.17.00009
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. Derr V.,
    2. Rigolon A
    . (2016). Participatory schoolyard design for health and well-being: Policies that support play in urban green spaces. In Freeman C., Tranter P., Skelton T. (Eds.),Risk, protection, provision, and policy(pp. 1–34). Volume 12 of Geographies of children and young people. Singapore: Springer Science and Business Media. doi:10.1007/978-981-287-035-3_21
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    1. Dovey K.
    (1983). The creation of a sense of place: The case of Preshil. Places, 1(2), 32–40.
    OpenUrl
    1. Fjørtoft I.
    (2004). Landscape as playscape: The effects of natural environments on children’s play and motor skills. Children, Youth and Environments, 14(2), 21–44. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.14.2.0021
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Fuad-Luke A
    . (2009). Design activism. Beautiful strangeness for a sustainable world. London, UK: Earthscan.
  10. ↵
    1. Green S.,
    2. Burke J.,
    3. McKenna M
    , (2016). Youth Voices, public spaces, and civic engagement. New York: Routledge.
  11. ↵
    1. Green M.
    (2014). Transformational design literacies. Children as active place-makers. Children’s Geographies, 12(2), 189–204. doi:10.1080/14733285.2013.812305
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    1. Hart R. A.
    (1999). Children’s participation: The theory and practice of involving young citizens in community development and environmental care. London, UK: Earthscan.
  13. ↵
    1. Herrington S.,
    2. Studtmann K
    (1998). Landscape interventions: New directions for the design of children’s outdoor play environments. Landscape and Urban Planning, 42(2–4), 191–205. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00087-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    1. Ito K.,
    2. Fjørtoft I.,
    3. Manabe T.,
    4. Kamada M
    . (2014). Landscape design for urban biodiversity and ecological education in Japan: Approach from process planning and multifunctional landscape planning. In Nakagoshi N., Mabuhay J. A. (Eds.),Designing low carbon societies in landscapes (pp. 73–86). Tokyo, Japan: Springer Japan. doi:10.1007/978-4-431-54819-5_5
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. ↵
    1. Jansson M.,
    2. Mårtensson F.,
    3. Gunnarsson A
    (2018). The meaning of participation in school ground greening: A study from project to everyday setting. Landscape Research, 43(1), 163–179. doi:10.1080/01426397.2017.1306623
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. ↵
    1. Luchs A.,
    2. Fikus M
    (2013). A comparative study of active play on differently designed playgrounds. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 13(3), 206–222. doi:10.1080/14729679.2013.778784
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. ↵
    1. Malone K
    . (2016). Dapto dreaming: A place-based environmental education project supporting children to be agents of change. In Winograd K. (Ed.),Education in times of environmental crisis: Teaching children to be agents of change (pp. 113–128). New York, NY: Routledge.
  18. ↵
    1. Moore R. C.,
    2. Cooper A
    . (2014). Nature play & learning places: Creating and managing places where children engage with nature. Raleigh, NC: Natural Learning Initiative and Reston, VA: National Wildlife Federation.
  19. ↵
    1. Nicholson S.
    (1971). How not to cheat children: The theory of loose parts. Landscape Architecture, 62(1), 30–34.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Parnell R
    . (2015). Co-creative adventures in school design. In Woolner P. (Ed.),School design together (pp. 123–137). New York, NY: Routledge.
  21. ↵
    1. Parnell R.,
    2. Cave V.,
    3. Torrington J
    (2008). School design: Opportunities through collaboration. CoDesign, 4(4), 211–224. doi:10.1080/15710880802524904
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. ↵
    1. Rigolon A.,
    2. Derr V.,
    3. Chawla L
    . (2015). Green grounds for play and learning: An intergenerational model for joint design and use of school and park systems. In Sinnett D., Smith N., Burgess S. (Eds.), Handbook on green infrastructure: Planning, design and implementation (pp. 281–300). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  23. ↵
    1. Sanoff H
    . (2000). Community participation methods in design and planning. New York, NY: Wiley.
  24. ↵
    1. Wake S. J.,
    2. Eames C
    (2013). Developing an “ecology of learning” within a school sustainability co-design project with children in New Zealand. Local Environment, 18(3), 305–322. doi:10.1080/13549839.2012.748723
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. ↵
    1. Wandersman A.
    (1979). User participation in planning environments: A conceptual framework. Environment and Behavior, 11(2), 185–208. doi:10.1177/0013916579114003
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Landscape Journal: 37 (1)
Landscape Journal
Vol. 37, Issue 1
1 Jan 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Landscape Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Fluid or Fixed? Processes that Facilitate or Constrain a Sense of Inclusion in Participatory Schoolyard and Park Design
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Landscape Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Landscape Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Fluid or Fixed? Processes that Facilitate or Constrain a Sense of Inclusion in Participatory Schoolyard and Park Design
Angela Kreutz, Victoria Derr, Louise Chawla
Landscape Journal Jan 2018, 37 (1) 39-54; DOI: 10.3368/lj.37.1.39

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Fluid or Fixed? Processes that Facilitate or Constrain a Sense of Inclusion in Participatory Schoolyard and Park Design
Angela Kreutz, Victoria Derr, Louise Chawla
Landscape Journal Jan 2018, 37 (1) 39-54; DOI: 10.3368/lj.37.1.39
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • LITERATURE REVIEW: PARTICIPATORY LANDSCAPE DESIGN
    • CASE STUDY OF A MULTIPLE PHASE DESIGN PROCESS
    • RESEARCH METHODS: FACILITATOR REFLECTIONS AND PARTICIPANT VOICES
    • RESULTS BY PROJECT PHASES
    • ALL PHASES: PROBLEMS WITH “IN” AND “OUT”
    • DISCUSSION: OPPORTUNITIES GAINED AND LOST
    • CONCLUSION: A RETURN TO PROCESS PLANNING
    • AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION
    • PEER REVIEW STATEMENT
    • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A Tribute to Robert B. Riley 1931–2019
  • A Tribute to Pat Dwayne Taylor, PhD, FASLA, FCELA (July 7, 1944-September 8, 2018)
  • Designing the Correctional Landscape: An Invitation to Landscape Architecture Professionals
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Participation
  • children
  • nature play
  • environmental learning
UW Press logo

© 2025 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire