In Search of Landscape as a Medium for Integration: The Potentials of Landscape Narratives in the Practice of Landscape Architecture

REFERENCES

1. ↵
   1. Ahern J.

   (2005). Integration of landscape ecology and landscape architecture: An evolutionary and reciprocal process. In Wiens J. A., Moss M. R. (Eds.), Issues and perspectives in landscape ecology (pp. 311–19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511614415

   OpenUrlCrossRef
2. ↵
   1. Ambrosini V.,
   2. Bowman C.

   (2001). Tacit knowledge: Some suggestions for operationalization. Journal of Management Studies, 38(6), 811–29. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00260.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
3. ↵
   1. Antonson H.

   (2009). Bridging the gap between research and planning practice concerning landscape. Land Use Policy, 26(2), 169–77. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.02.009

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. 1. Antrop M.

   (2004). Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe. Landscape and Urban Planning, 67(1–4), 9–26.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. ↵
   1. Antrop M.

   (2005a). Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70, 21–34. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.002

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. ↵
   1. Antrop M.

   (2005b). From holistic landscape synthesis to transdisciplinary landscape management. In Tress B., Tress G., Fry G., Opdam P. (Eds.), From landscape research to landscape planning: Aspects of integration, education and application (pp. 27–60). Wageningen: Frontis–Wageningen International Nucleus for Strategic Expertise.
7. ↵
   1. Antrop M.

   (2006). Sustainable landscapes: Contradiction, fiction or utopia. Landscape and Urban Planning, 75, 187–97. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.014

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. ↵
   1. Antrop M.,
   2. Van Eetvelde V.

   (2017). Landscape perspectives: The holistic nature of landscape. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-024-1183-6

   OpenUrlCrossRef
9. ↵
   1. Bastian O.

   (2001). Landscape ecology—towards a unified discipline? Landscape Ecology, 16, 757–66. doi: 10.1023/A:1014412915534

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. 1. Bloemers T.,
    2. Kars H.,
    3. van der Valk A.,
    4. Wijnen M.

    (Eds.). (2010). The cultural landscape and heritage paradox. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
11. ↵
    1. Bohnet I.,
    2. Konold W.

    (2015). New approaches to support implementation of nature conservation, landscape management and cultural landscape development; experiences from Germany’s southwest. Sustainability Science, 10(2), 244–55. doi: 10.1007/s11625-015-0290-z

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. ↵
    1. Bomans K.,
    2. Steenberghen T.,
    3. Dewaelheyns V.,
    4. Leinfelder H.,
    5. Gulinck H.

    (2010). Underrated transformations in the open space—the case of an urbanized and multifunctional area. Landscape and Urban Planning, 94(3–4), 196–205.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. 1. Botequilha Leitao A.,
    2. Ahern J.

    (2002). Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 59(2), 65–93.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. 1. Buchecker M.,
    2. Hunziker M.,
    3. Kienast F.

    (2003). Participatory landscape development: overcoming social barriers to public involvement. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64(1–2), 29–46.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. 1. Burel F.,
    2. Baudry J.

    (2003). Landscape ecology: Concepts, methods and applications. Enfield: Science Publishers.
16. 1. Buttimer A.

    (1980) Social Space and the Planning of Residential Areas. In Buttimer A., Seamon D. The Human Experience of Space and Place (pp. 21–54). New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315684192

    OpenUrlCrossRef
17. ↵
    1. Calkins M.

    (2005). Strategy use and challenges of ecological design in landscape architecture. Landscape and Urban Planning, 73(1), 29–48. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.06.003

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. ↵
    1. Castella J.-C.,
    2. Bourgoin J.,
    3. Lestrelin G.,
    4. Bouahom B.

    (2014). A model of the science–practice–policy interface in participatory land-use planning: Lessons from Laos. Landscape Ecology, 29(6), 1095–107. doi: 10.1007/s10980-014-0043-x

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. ↵
    1. Corbin J.,
    2. Strauss A.

    (2008). Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452230153

    OpenUrlCrossRef
20. 1. Corner J.

    (1992) Representation and landscape. In Swaffield S. (Ed.). (2002). Theory in landscape architecture: A reader (pp. 144–164). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
21. ↵
    1. Corner J.

    (Ed.). (1999a). Recovering landscape—Essays in contemporary landscape architecture. New York: Princeton Architectural Press. doi:10.2307/1587130

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. 1. Corner J.

    (1999b). Eidetic Operations and New Landscapes. In Corner J. (Ed.). (1999). Recovering landscape—Essays in contemporary landscape architecture (pp. 153–170). New York: Princeton Architectural Press. doi:10.2307/1587130

    OpenUrlCrossRef
23. 1. Cosgrove D.

    (1998). Social formation and symbolic landscape. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
24. 1. Council of Europe.

    (2000). European Landscape Convention. Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/en/web/landscape
25. 1. Council of Europe.

    (2008). Recommendation CM/Rec(2008)3 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the guidelines for the implementation of the European Landscape Convention. Retrieved from https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectID=09000016805d3e6c
26. 1. Czerniak J.

    (2006) Looking Back at Landscape Urbanism: Speculations on Site. In Waldheim C. (Ed.) The landscape urbanism reader (pp. 105–124). New York: Princeton Architectural Press. doi:0.1111/j.1531-314X.2007.00156.x

    OpenUrlCrossRef
27. 1. Davenport M.,
    2. Anderson D.

    (2005). Getting from Sense of Place to Place-based Management: An interpretive Investigation of Place Meanings and Perceptions of Landscape Change. Society and Natural Resources, 18(7), 625–641.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
28. 1. De Meulder B.,
    2. Vandenbroucke T.

    (2004). Het Leie-Schelde-interfluvium: Theater van de bricolage. Oase, 63, 110–39.

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. ESF/COST

    . (2010). Landscape in a changing world: Bridging divides, integrating disciplines, serving society. Retrieved from https://edepot.wur.nl/161371
30. 1. Fairbrother N.

    , (1970). New lives, new landscapes. In Swaffield S. (Ed.). (2002). Theory in landscape architecture: A reader (pp. 82–83). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
31. ↵
    1. Fairclough G.,
    2. van Londen H.

    (2010). Changing landscapes of archeology and heritage. In Bloemers T., Kars H., van der Valk A., Wijnen M. (Eds.), The cultural landscape and heritage paradox (pp. 653–69). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
32. 1. Fairclough G.,
    2. Sarlöv Herlin I,
    3. Swanwick C.

    (2018) Routledge Handbook of Landscape Character Assessment—Current Approaches to Characterisation and Assessment. London: Routledge.
33. 1. Field D.,
    2. Voss P.,
    3. Kuczenski T.,
    4. Hammer R.,
    5. Radeloff V.

    (2003). Reaffirming social analysis in landscape ecology: A conceptual framework. Society and Natural Resources, 16, 349–61.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Flyvbjerg B.

    (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–45. doi: 10.1177/1077800405284363

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
35. 1. Forman R.,
    2. Godron M.

    (1986). Landscape ecology. New York: Wiley.
36. 1. Godkin M.A.

    (1980). Identity and Place: Clinical Applications Based on Notions of Rootedness and Uprootedness. In Buttimer A., Seamon D. The Human Experience of Space and Place (pp. 73–85). New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315684192

    OpenUrlCrossRef
37. ↵
    1. Groffman P,
    2. Likens G.

    (1994). Preface. In Groffman P., Likens G. (Eds.), Integrated regional models. New York: Chapman and Hall.
38. ↵
    1. Hajer M.

    (2006). Doing discourse analysis: Coalitions, practices, meaning. In van den Brink M., Metze T. (Eds.), Words matter in policy and planning—Discourse theory and method in the social sciences (pp. 65–74). Utrecht: Koninklijk Nederlands Aardrijkskundig Genootschap.
39. ↵
    1. Hall K.,
    2. Porterfield G.,
    3. Lochner W.

    (2001). Community by design—New urbanism for suburbs and small communities. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional.
40. 1. Halprin L.

    (1969) The RSVP cycles. In Swaffield S. (Ed.). (2002). Theory in landscape architecture: A reader. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
41. ↵
    1. Healey P.

    (2013). Circuits of knowledge and techniques: The transnational flow of planning ideas and practices. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(5), 1510–26.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
42. 1. Herrington S.

    (2010). The nature of Ian McHarg’s science. Landscape Journal, 29, 1–10.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
43. 1. Hester R.

    (1974) Community Design. In Swaffield S. (Ed.). (2002). Theory in landscape architecture: A reader (pp. 49–56). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
44. 1. Ingold T.

    (1993). The temporality of the landscape. World Archaeology, 25(2), 152–74.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
45. 1. Jackson J.B.

    (1984) Discovering the vernacular landscape. Yale: University Press.
46. 1. Jacobs M.

    (2002) Landschap 3, Het ware, juiste en waarachtige landschap. Wageningen: Alterra Expertisecentrum Landschapsbeleving.
47. ↵
    1. Kaplan A.

    (2009). Landscape architecture’s commitment to landscape concept: A missing link? Journal of Landscape Architecture, 4(1), 56–66. doi: 10.1080/18626033.2009.9723413

    OpenUrlCrossRef
48. ↵
    1. Kapper T.,
    2. Chenoweth R.

    (2000). Landscape architecture and societal values: Evidence from literature. Landscape Journal, 19(1–2), 149–55. doi: 10.3368/lj.19.1-2.149

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
49. ↵
    1. LaGro J. A.

    (1999). Research capacity: A matter of semantics? Landscape Journal, 18(2), 179–86. doi: 10.3368/lj.18.2.179

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
50. 1. LaGro J. A.

    (2001). Site analysis: Linking program and concept in land planning and design. New York: Wiley and Sons.
51. 1. Lang J.

    (1987) Creating Architectural Theory. The role of Behavioral Sciences in Environmental Design. London: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
52. 1. Laurie M.

    (1975). An introduction to landscape architecture. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
53. ↵
    1. Lawson B.

    (1980). How designers think. London: Architectural Press.
54. ↵
    1. Lawson B.

    (2004). What designers know. Oxford: Elsevier.
55. 1. Linehan J. R.,
    2. Gross M.

    (1998). Back to the future, back to basics: The social ecology of landscapes and the future of landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 42(2/4), 207–23.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
56. 1. Lorzing H.

    (2001). The nature of landscape: A personal quest. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers.
57. ↵
    1. Luz F.

    (2000). Participatory landscape ecology: A basis for acceptance and implementation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 50(1–3), 157–66. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00087-6

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
58. 1. Lyle J.T.

    (1991). Can floating seeds make deep forms?. In Swaffield S. (Ed.). (2002). Theory in landscape architecture: A reader (p. 188). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
59. 1. Lyle J. T.

    (1999). Design for human ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
60. 1. Lynch K.,
    2. Hack G.

    (1984). Site planning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
61. 1. Macpherson H.

    (2005). Landscape’s ocular-centrism—and beyond? In Tress B., et al. From Landscape Research to Landscape Planning. (pp. 95–104). Wageningen: Frontis.
62. 1. Makhzoumi J.,
    2. Pungetti G.

    (1999). Ecological landscape design and planning. London: E and FN Sponn.
63. 1. Marcucci D.

    (2000). Landscape history as a planning tool. Landscape and Urban Planning, 49(1–2), 67–81.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
64. ↵
    1. Marshall M.

    (1996). The key informant technique. Family Practice, 13(1), 92–97. doi: 10.1093/fampra/13.1.92

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
65. ↵
    1. Matland R. E.

    (1995). Synthesizing the implementation literature—The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5(2), 145–74.

    OpenUrl
66. 1. McHarg I.

    (1967) An Ecological Method. In Swaffield S. (Ed.). (2002). Theory in landscape architecture: A reader. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
67. 1. Meinig D. W.

    (Ed.). (1979). The interpretation of ordinary landscapes. New York: Oxford University Press.
68. ↵
    1. Milburn L.-A. S.,
    2. Brown R. D.

    (2003). The relationship between research and design in landscape architecture. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64(1–2), 47–66. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00200-1

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
69. ↵
    1. Milburn L. A.,
    2. Brown R. D.,
    3. Paine C.

    (2001). “…Research on research”: Research attitudes and behaviors of landscape architecture faculty in North America. Landscape and Urban Planning, 57(2), 57–67. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00188-8

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
70. ↵
    1. Miles M.,
    2. Huberman M.

    (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
71. 1. Morrow R.,
    2. Moore K.

    (2004). An inclusive design dialogue on ethics and aesthetics. In Anonymous, OPENspace—People Space Conference, 27 October, OPENspace Research Centre, Edinburgh.
72. ↵
    1. Musacchio L.

    (2011). The grand challenge to operationalize landscape sustainability and the design-in-science paradigm. Landscape Ecology, 26, 1–5. doi: 10.1007/s10980-010-9562-2

    OpenUrlCrossRef
73. 1. Nadenicek D. J.,
    2. Hastings C. M.

    (2000). Environmental rhetoric, environmental sophism: The words and work of landscape architecture. In Conan M. (Ed.), Environmentalism in landscape architecture (pp. 133–61). Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks.
74. 1. Nassauer J. I.

    (1992). The appearance of ecological systems as a matter of policy. Landscape Ecology, 6(4), 239–50.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
75. 1. Nassauer J. I.

    (1995a). Messy ecosystems, orderly frames. In Swaffield S. (Ed.). (2002). Theory in landscape architecture: A reader (pp. 196–206). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
76. 1. Nassauer J.I.

    (1995b) Culture and changing landscape structure. Landscape Ecology, 10(4), 229–237.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
77. ↵
    1. Nassauer J.

    (2012). Landscape as medium and method for synthesis in urban ecological design. Landscape and Urban Planning, 106, 221–29. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.03.014

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
78. ↵
    1. Nassauer J. I.,
    2. Corry R. C.

    (2004). Using normative scenarios in landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology, 19(4), 343–56. doi: 10.1023/B:LAND.0000030666.55372.ae

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
79. ↵
    1. Nassauer J.,
    2. Opdam P.

    (2008). Design in science: Extending the landscape ecology paradigm. Landscape Ecology, 23, 633–44. doi: 10.1007/s10980-008-9226-7

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
80. 1. Naveh Z.

    (2000). What is holistic landscape ecology? A conceptual introduction. Landscape and Urban Planning, 50(1–3), 7–26.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
81. 1. Ndubisi F.

    (2002). Managing change in the landscape: A synthesis of approaches for ecological planning. Landscape Journal, 21, 138–55.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
82. ↵
    1. Neuman W. L.

    (2007). Basics of social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Boston: Pearson Education.
83. 1. Olin L.

    (1988) Form, Meaning, and Expression. In Swaffield S. (Ed.). (2002). Theory in landscape architecture: A reader (pp. 77–79). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
84. 1. Olwig K.

    (2004). This is not a landscape: Circulating reference and land shaping. In Palang H., Soovali H., Antrop M., Setten G., European rural landscapes: Persistence and change in a globalising environment (pp. 41–66). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
85. ↵
    1. Opdam P.

    (2010). Learning science from practice. Landscape Ecology, 25, 821–23. doi: 10.1007/s10980-010-9485-y

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
86. ↵
    1. Opdam P.,
    2. Foppen R.,
    3. Vos C.

    (2002). Bridging the gap between ecology and spatial planning in landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology, 16(8), 767–79. doi: 10.1023/A:1014475908949

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
87. 1. Palang H.,
    2. Fry G.

    (2003). Landscape interfaces. In Palang H., Fry G. (Eds.), Landscape interfaces, cultural heritage in changing landscapes (pp. 1–13). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
88. 1. Palmboom F.

    (2010a). Landscape urbanism: Conflation or coalition? Topos, 71, 43–49.

    OpenUrl
89. 1. Palmboom F.

    (2010b). Drawing the ground. Layering time. In Palmboom F., Thomaes S., Stoeckaert J., Kieboom C., van Puffelen J. (Eds.). Drawing the ground—Landscape urbanism today (pp. 33–44). Basel: Birkhauser.
90. 1. Palmboom F.,
    2. Thomaes S.,
    3. Stoeckaert J.,
    4. Kieboom C.,
    5. van Puffelen J.

    (Eds.). (2010). Drawing the ground—Landscape urbanism today. Basel: Birkhauser.
91. 1. Parsons R.,
    2. Daniel T.

    (2002). Good looking: In defence of scenic landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 60(1), 43–56.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
92. ↵
    1. Patton M. Q.

    (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
93. ↵
    1. Potteiger M.,
    2. Purinton J.

    (1998). Landscape narratives—Design practices for telling stories. New York: Wiley and Sons.
94. 1. Preece R. A.

    (1991). Designs on the landscape. Exeter: SRP.
95. ↵
    1. Prendergast J.,
    2. Quinn R.,
    3. Lawton J.

    (1999). The gaps between theory and practice in selecting nature reserves. Conservation Biology, 13, 484–92. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.97428.x

    OpenUrlCrossRef
96. ↵
    1. Prescott M.,
    2. Ninsalam Y.

    (2016). The synthesis of environmental and socio-cultural information in the ecological design of urban riverine landscapes. Sustainable Cities and Society, 20, 222–36. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2015.09.014

    OpenUrlCrossRef
97. 1. Provost A.,
    2. Racine M.,
    3. Baridon M.,
    4. Provost A.

    (2004). Paysagiste/landscape architect: Paysages inventes/Invented landscapes. Oostkamp: Stichting Kunstboek.
98. ↵
    1. Rakatansky M.

    (1992). Spatial narratives. In Whiteman J., Kipnis J., Burdett R. (Eds.), Strategies of architectural thinking (pp. 201–21). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
99. 1. RECEP-ENELC.

    (2009). The European Landscape Convention: A litmus test for the exercise of local and regional authorities’ public responsibilities at national and international level. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/16806b0804
100. 1. Relph E.

     (1993) Place Reclamation. In Swaffield S. (Ed.). (2002). Theory in landscape architecture: A reader (pp. 102–103). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
101. 1. Ruiz J.,
     2. Domon G.

     (2005). Integrating physical and human dynamics in landscape trajectories: Exemplified at the Aulnages watershed (Quebec, Canada). In Tress B., Tress G., Fry G., Opdam P. (Eds.), From landscape research to landscape planning: Aspects of integration, education and application (pp. 67–81). Wageningen: Frontis.
102. ↵
     1. Sarlöv Herlin I.

     (2004). New challenges in the field of spatial planning: Landscapes. Landscape Research, 29(4), 399–411. doi: 10.1080/0142639042000289037

     OpenUrlCrossRef
103. 1. Schoonderbeek M.

     (2006). Het landschap als historische montage—een gesprek tussen Jan Kolen en Dirk Sijmons. Oase, 69, 81–91.

     OpenUrl
104. 1. Seamon D.

     (2007) A way of Seeing People and Place: Phenomenology in Environment-Behavior Research. In Wapner S., Demick J., Yamamoto T., Minami H., (Eds.), Theoretical Perspectives on Environment-Behavior Research (pp. 157–178). New York: Plenum.
105. ↵
     1. Selman P.

     (2006). Planning at the landscape scale. London: Routledge.
106. 1. Shane G.

     (2003). The emergence of “landscape urbanism.” Harvard Design Magazine, 19, 1–8.

     OpenUrl
107. ↵
     1. Sheppard S.

     (2015). Making climate change visible: A critical role for landscape professionals. Landscape and Urban Planning, 142, 95–105. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.07.006

     OpenUrlCrossRef
108. 1. Sijmons D.

     (1991). Het casco-concept: Een benaderingswijze voor de landschapsplanning, Utrecht: IKC-NBLF.
109. 1. Steenbergen C.,
     2. Reh W.

     (2003). Architectuur en landschap: Het ontwerpexperiment van de klassieke Europese tuinen en landschappen. Bussum: Toth.
110. ↵
     1. Stevens C.,
     2. Fraser I.,
     3. Mitchley J.,
     4. Thomas M.

     (2007). Making ecological science policy-relevant: Issues of scale and disciplinary integration. Landscape Ecology, 22, 799–809. doi: 10.1007/s10980-007-9092-8

     OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
111. ↵
     1. Stokols D.

     (2011). Transdisciplinary action research in landscape architecture and planning—Prospects and challenges. Landscape Journal, 30, 1–11. doi: 10.1353/lnd.2011.0011

     OpenUrlFREE Full Text
112. 1. Swaffield S.

     (Ed.). (2002). Theory in landscape architecture: A reader. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
113. 1. Terkenli T.

     (2001). Towards a theory of the landscape: the Aegean landscape as a cultural image. Landscape and Urban Planning, 57(3–4), 197–208.

     OpenUrl
114. ↵
     1. Theobald D.,
     2. Hobbs N.,
     3. Bearly T,
     4. Zack J.,
     5. Shenk T.,
     6. Riebsame W.

     (2000). Incorporating biological information in local land use decision making: Designing a system for conservation planning, Landscape Ecology, 15, 35–45. doi: 10.1023/A:1008165311026

     OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
115. ↵
     1. Thompson I.

     (2002). Ecology, community and delight: A trivalent approach to landscape education. Landscape and Urban Planning, 60(2), 81–93.

     OpenUrl
116. 1. Thorne J. F.,
     2. Huang C.-S.

     (1991). Toward a landscape ecological aesthetic: Methodologies for designers and planners. Landscape and Urban Planning, 21(1–2), 61–79.

     OpenUrlCrossRef
117. ↵
     1. Throgmorton J.

     (2003). Planning as persuasive storytelling in the context of “the network society.” Planning Theory, 2(2), 125–51. doi: 10.1177/14730952030022003

     OpenUrlCrossRef
118. 1. Thwaites K.

     (2000). Expressivist Landscape Architecture: The Development of a New Conceptual Framework for Landscape Architecture. Landscape Journal, 19(1–2), 201–210.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
119. ↵
     1. Tress B.,
     2. Tress G.,
     3. Van der Valk A.,
     4. Fry G.

     (Eds.). (2003). Interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary landscape studies: Potential and limitations. Wageningen: Delta Series.
120. 1. Tuan Y.F.

     (1974) Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes, and Values. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.
121. ↵
     1. Van Damme S.

     (2015). Back to the future: Merging landscape concepts of the 1980s into the truly holistic framework of tomorrow. Journal of Landscape Architecture, 10(3), 52–67. doi: 10.1080/18626033.2015.1094915

     OpenUrlCrossRef
122. ↵
     1. Van Damme S.,
     2. Leinfelder H.,
     3. Uyttenhove P.

     (2013). Landscape as a medium for integration in design practice: The case of Flanders, Belgium. European Planning Studies, 21(8), 1128–52. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.722938

     OpenUrlCrossRef
123. ↵
     1. Von Haaren C.,
     2. Warren-Kretzschmar B.,
     3. Milos C.,
     4. Werthmann C.

     (2014). Opportunities for design approaches in landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 130, 159–70. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.06.012

     OpenUrlCrossRef
124. 1. Waldheim C.

     (2006b). Landscape as Urbanism. In Waldheim C. (Ed.). The landscape urbanism reader (pp. 35–54). New York: Princeton Architectural Press. doi:10.1111/j.1531-314X.2007.00156.x

     OpenUrlCrossRef
125. ↵
     1. Waldheim C.

     (Ed.). (2006a). The landscape urbanism reader. New York: Princeton Architectural Press. doi:10.1111/j.1531-314X.2007.00156.x

     OpenUrlCrossRef
126. 1. Weller R.

     (2006) An Art of Instrumentality: Thinking Through Landscape Urbanism. In Waldheim C. (Ed.). The landscape urbanism reader (pp. 69–86). New York: Princeton Architectural Press. doi:10.1111/j.1531-314X.2007.00156.x

     OpenUrlCrossRef
127. ↵
     1. Whiston Spirn A.

     (1998). The language of landscape. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. doi:10.2307/3985672

     OpenUrlCrossRef
128. 1. Wood R.,
     2. Handley J.

     (2001). Landscape dynamics and the management of change, Landscape Research, 26(1), 45–54.

     OpenUrl
129. ↵
     1. Yin R. K.

     (2003). Case study research—Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
130. 1. Zube E. H.

     (1998). The evolution of a profession. Landscape and Urban Planning, 42(2–4), 75–80.

     OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science