Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • ASLA Research Grant
  • Other Publications
    • UW Press Journals
    • Ecological Restoration
    • Land Economics
    • Native Plants Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Landscape Journal
  • Other Publications
    • UW Press Journals
    • Ecological Restoration
    • Land Economics
    • Native Plants Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Landscape Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • ASLA Research Grant
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticlePeer-Reviewed Articles

Leveling the Landscape: Landscape Performance as a Green Infrastructure Evaluation Tool for Service-Learning Products

Marccus D. Hendricks, Galen Newman, Siyu Yu and Jennifer Horney
Landscape Journal, January 2018, 37 (2) 19-39; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.37.2.19
Marccus D. Hendricks
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Galen Newman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Siyu Yu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer Horney
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Ahern J.,
    2. Cilliers S.,
    3. Niemelä J.
    (2014). The concept of ecosystem services in adaptive urban planning and design: A framework for supporting innovation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 254–59.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    1. Baptiste A. K.,
    2. Foley C.,
    3. Smardon R.
    (2015). Understanding urban neighborhood differences in willingness to implement green infrastructure measures: A case study of Syracuse, NY. Landscape and Urban Planning, 136, 1–12.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Berke P.,
    2. Newman G.,
    3. Lee J.,
    4. Combs T.,
    5. Kolosna C.,
    6. Salvensen D.
    (2015). Assessing networks of plans and vulnerability to coastal hazards and climate change. Journal of the American Planning Association, 81(4), 287–302.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Brody S. D.,
    2. Highfield W. E.
    2013). Open space protection and flood mitigation: A national study. Land Use Policy, 32, 89–95. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.10.017
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    1. Bullard R. D.,
    2. Wright B
    . (2009). Race, place, and the environment in post-Katrina New Orleans. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  6. ↵
    1. Callaghan E. G.,
    2. Colton J..
    (2008). Building sustainable and resilient communities: A balancing of community capital. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 10(6), 931–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. Cameron M.,
    2. Forsyth A.,
    3. Green W. A.,
    4. Lu H.,
    5. McGirr P.,
    6. Owens P. E.,
    7. Stoltz R.
    (2001). Learning through service: The community design studio. College Teaching, 49(3), 105–113.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Carson T.,
    2. Keeley M.,
    3. Marasco D. E.,
    4. McGillis W.,
    5. Culligan P.
    (2017). Assessing methods for predicting green roof rainfall capture: A comparison between full-scale observations and four hydrologic models. Urban Water Journal, 14(6), 589–603.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Carter J. G.,
    2. Handley J.,
    3. Butlin T.,
    4. Gill S.
    (2017). Adapting cities to climate change–exploring the flood risk management role of green infrastructure landscapes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 61(9), 1535–52. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2017.1355777
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Center for Neighborhood Technology (CNT)
    . (2010). The value of green infrastructure: A guide to recognizing its economic, environmental and social benefits. Chicago: Center for Neighborhood Technology. Retrieved from http://www.cnt.org/repository/gi-values-guide.pdf
    1. Center for Neighborhood Technology (CNT)
    . (2016). National green values calculator methodology. Chicago: Center for Neighborhood Technology. Retrieved from: http://greenvalues.cnt.org/national/downloads/methodology.pdf
  11. ↵
    1. Cerra J. F.
    (2016). Inland adaptation: Developing a studio model for climate-adaptive design as a framework for design practice. Landscape Journal, 35(1), 37–56.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Chang H
    . (2019). Environmental justice as justification for landscape architectural design. Landscape Journal, 37(2), (this issue).
  12. ↵
    1. Chou R.
    (2018). Going out into the field: An experience of the landscape architecture studio incorporating service learning and participatory design in Taiwan. Landscape Research, 43(6), 784–97.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Clark C.,
    2. Adriaens P.,
    3. Talbot F. B.
    2008). Green roof valuation: A probabilistic economic analysis of environmental benefits. Environmental Science & Technology, 42(6), 2155–61.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Clements J.,
    2. St. Juliana A.,
    3. Davis P.,
    4. Levine L.
    (2013). The green edge: How commercial property investment in green infrastructure creates value. Natural Resources Defense Council. Retrieved from https://www.nrdc.org/sites/default/files/commercial-value-green-infrastructure-report.pdf
    1. Currie B. A.,
    2. Bass B.
    (2008). Estimates of air pollution mitigation with green plants and green roofs using the UFORE model. Urban ecosystems, 11(4), 409–422.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Cutter S. L.,
    2. Boruff B. J.,
    3. Shirley W. L.
    2003). Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 84(2), 242–61. doi: 10.1111/1540-6237.8402002
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    1. Damodaram C.,
    2. Giacomoni M. H.,
    3. Prakash Khedun C.,
    4. Holmes H.,
    5. Ryan A.,
    6. Saour W.,
    7. Zechman E. M.
    2010). Simulation of combined best management practices and low impact development for sustainable stormwater management. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 46(5), 907–18.
    OpenUrl
    1. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
    . (n.d.). Environmental facts; EnviroFacts. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/enviro/
  17. ↵
    1. Flocks J.,
    2. Escobedo F.,
    3. Wade J.,
    4. Varela S.,
    5. Wald C.
    (2011). Environmental justice implications of urban tree cover in Miami-Dade County, Florida. Environmental Justice, 4(2), 125–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. ↵
    1. Forsyth A.,
    2. Lu H.,
    3. McGirr P.
    (1999). Inside the service learning studio in urban design. Landscape Journal, 18(2), 166–78.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Forsyth A.,
    2. Lu H.,
    3. McGirr P.
    (2000). Service learning in an urban context: Implications for planning and design education. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 17(3), 236–59.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Foster J.,
    2. Lowe A.,
    3. Winkelman S
    . (2011). The value of green infrastructure for urban climate adaptation. Washington, DC: Center for Clean Air Policy Retrieved from http://ccap.org/assets/The-Value-of-Green-Infrastructure-for-Urban-Climate-Adaptation_CCAP-Feb-2011.pdf
  21. ↵
    1. Gittleman M.,
    2. Farmer C. J.,
    3. Kremer P.,
    4. McPhearson T.
    (2017). Estimating stormwater runoff for community gardens in New York City. Urban Ecosystems, 20(1), 129–39.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Glackin S.,
    2. Dionisio M.
    (2016). “Deep engagement” and urban regeneration: Tea, trust, and the quest for co-design at precinct scale. Land Use Policy, 52, 363–73.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Helms M. M.,
    2. Rutti R. M.,
    3. Hervani A. A.,
    4. LaBonte J.,
    5. Sarkarat S.
    (2015). Implementing and evaluating online service learning projects. Journal of Education for Business, 90(7), 369–78.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Hendricks M. D.,
    2. Meyer M. A.,
    3. Gharaibeh N. G.,
    4. Van Zandt S.,
    5. Masterson J.,
    6. Cooper J. T.,
    7. Berke P.
    (2018). The development of a participatory assessment technique for infrastructure: Neighborhood-level monitoring towards sustainable infrastructure systems. Sustainable Cities and Society, 38, 265–74. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2017.12.039
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. ↵
    1. Highfield W. E.,
    2. Norman S. A.,
    3. Brody S. D.
    2013). Examining the 100-year floodplain as a metric of risk, loss, and household adjustment. Risk Analysis, 33(2), 186–91.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. Hill M. M.
    (2005). Teaching with culture in mind: Cross-cultural learning in landscape architecture education. Landscape Journal, 24(2), 117–24.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Hirsch J. A.,
    2. Green G. F.,
    3. Peterson M.,
    4. Rodriguez D. A.,
    5. Gordon-Larsen P.
    (2016). Neighborhood sociodemographics and change in built infrastructure. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 10(2), 1–17. doi: 10.1080/17549175.2016.1212914
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. ↵
    1. Hou J
    . (2014). Life before/during/between/after the service-learning design studios. In Bose M., Horrigan P., Doble C., Shipp S. C. (Eds.), Community matters: Service-learning in engaged design and planning (pp. 315–33). Oxon, UK: Routledge.
  29. ↵
    1. Isaacson M.,
    2. Gudell J. E.,
    3. Miller J.,
    4. Wiese J.
    (2014). Urban flooding and energy efficiency: Leveraging community action. ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, 10, 158–69. Retrieved from http://www.elevateenergy.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/Urban_Flooding_and_Energy_Efficiency1.pdf
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Jayasooriya V. M.,
    2. Ng A. W. M.
    2014). Tools for modeling of stormwater management and economics of green infra-structure practices: A review. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 225(8), 2055. doi: 10.1007/s11270-014-2055-1
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. ↵
    1. Jennings V.,
    2. Johnson Gaither C.,
    3. Gragg R. S.
    2012). Promoting environmental justice through urban green space access: A synopsis. Environmental Justice, 5(1), 1–7.
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    1. Kardan O.,
    2. Gozdyra P.,
    3. Misic B.,
    4. Moola F.,
    5. Palmer L. J.,
    6. Paus T.,
    7. Berman M. G.
    2015). Neighborhood greenspace and health in a large urban center. Scientific Reports, 5, 11610. doi: 10.1038/srep11610
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Kaufman L.,
    2. Sandin S.,
    3. Sala E.,
    4. Obura D.,
    5. Rohwer F.,
    6. Tschirky T
    . (2011). Coral Health Index (CHI): Measuring coral community health. Science and Knowledge Division, Conservation International, Arlington, VA.
  33. ↵
    1. Kondo M. C.,
    2. Low S. C.,
    3. Henning J.,
    4. Branas C. C.
    2015). The impact of green stormwater infrastructure installation on surrounding health and safety. American Journal of Public Health, 105(3), e114–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Kousky C.,
    2. Olmstead S. M.,
    3. Walls M. A.,
    4. Macauley M.
    (2013). Strategically placing green infrastructure: Cost-effective land conservation in the floodplain. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(8), 3563–70.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Kweon B. S.,
    2. Marans R. W.,
    3. Yi C. W.
    2016). Parks and quality of life: Differences among African American and white residents. Landscape Journal, 35(1), 97–108.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Landry S. M.,
    2. Chakraborty J.
    (2009). Street trees and equity: Evaluating the spatial distribution of an urban amenity. Environment and Planning A, 41(11), 2651–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  37. ↵
    1. Liu W.,
    2. Chen W.,
    3. Peng C.
    (2014). Assessing the effectiveness of green infrastructures on urban flooding reduction: A community scale study. Ecological Modelling, 291, 6–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.07.012
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  38. ↵
    1. Liu Y.,
    2. Bralts V. F.,
    3. Engel B. A.
    2015). Evaluating the effectiveness of management practices on hydrology and water quality at watershed scale with a rainfall-runoff model. Science of the Total Environment, 511, 298–308.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Liu Y.,
    2. Theller L. O.,
    3. Pijanowski B. C.,
    4. Engel B. A.
    2016). Optimal selection and placement of green infrastructure to reduce impacts of land use change and climate change on hydrology and water quality: An application to the Trail Creek Watershed, Indiana. Science of the Total Environment, 553, 149–163.
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    1. Martin-Mikle C. J.,
    2. de Beurs K. M.,
    3. Julian J. P.,
    4. Mayer P. M.
    2015). Identifying priority sites for low impact development (LID) in a mixed-use watershed. Landscape and Urban Planning, 140, 29–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  41. ↵
    1. Masterson J.,
    2. Meyer M.,
    3. Ghariabeh N.,
    4. Hendricks M.,
    5. Lee R. J.,
    6. Musharrat S.,
    7. Newman G.,
    8. Sansom G.,
    9. Van Zandt S.
    (2019). Interdisciplinary citizen science for hazard and disaster education. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 37(1), 6–24.
    OpenUrl
  42. ↵
    1. McNally M. J.
    (2011). Nature big and small: Landscape planning in the wilds of Los Angeles. Landscape Journal, 30(1), 19–34.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. McPherson E. G.,
    2. Simpson J. R.,
    3. Peper P. J.,
    4. Maco S. E.,
    5. Gardner S. L.,
    6. Cozad S. K.,
    7. Xiao Q
    . (2006). Midwest community tree guide: benefits, costs, and strategic planting. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-199. Albany, CA: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station. 99 p, 199.
  43. ↵
    1. Meyer M.,
    2. Hendricks M.,
    3. Newman G.,
    4. Horney J.,
    5. Berke,
    6. Masterson J.,
    7. Sansom G.,
    8. Cousins T.,
    9. Van Zandt S.,
    10. Cooper. J.
    2018). Participatory action research: Tools for disaster resilience education. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 9(4/5), 402–19.
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    1. Mohai P.,
    2. Saha R.
    (2006). Reassessing racial and socioeconomic disparities in environmental justice research. Demography, 43(2), 383–99.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. ↵
    1. Newman G.,
    2. Brody S.,
    3. Smith A.
    (2017). Repurposing vacant land through landscape connectivity. Landscape Journal, 36(1), 37–57.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    1. Newman G.,
    2. Li D.,
    3. Ren D. D.,
    4. Guo R.
    (2018) Resilience through regeneration: The economics of repurposing vacant land with green infrastructure. Landscape Architecture Frontiers, 6(6), 10–23.
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    1. Nixon H.,
    2. Salazar D.
    (2015). Engaging students and community in urban environmental sustainability: CommUniverCity San José. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 17, 1–9.
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    1. O’Grady G.,
    2. Alwis W. A. M.
    (2012). Holistic assessment and problem-based learning. In O’Grady G., Yew E., Goh K., Schmidt H. (Eds.), One-day, one-problem (pp. 187–212). Singapore: Springer.
  49. ↵
    1. Opdam P.,
    2. Coninx I.,
    3. Dewulf A.,
    4. Steingröver E.,
    5. Vos C.,
    6. van der Wal M.
    (2015). Framing ecosystem services: Affecting behaviour of actors in collaborative landscape planning? Land Use Policy, 46, 223–31.
    OpenUrl
  50. ↵
    1. Oulahen G.,
    2. Mortsch L.,
    3. Tang K.,
    4. Harford D.
    (2015). Unequal vulnerability to flood hazards: “Ground truthing” a social vulnerability index of five municipalities in Metro Vancouver, Canada. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105(3), 473–95.
    OpenUrl
  51. ↵
    1. Peacock W.,
    2. Morrow B.,
    3. Gladwin H
    . (1997). Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, gender and the sociology of disasters. New York: Routledge.
  52. ↵
    1. Pearce A.,
    2. Manion W.
    (2016). Service learning for sustainability: A tale of two projects. Procedia Engineering, 145, 50–57.
    OpenUrl
  53. ↵
    1. Pyke C.,
    2. Warren M. P.,
    3. Johnson T.,
    4. LaGro J. Jr.,
    5. Scharfenberg J.,
    6. Groth P.,
    7. Main E.
    (2011). Assessment of low impact development for managing stormwater with changing precipitation due to climate change. Landscape and Urban Planning, 103(2), 166–73.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  54. ↵
    1. Reja M. Y.,
    2. Brody S.,
    3. Highfield W.,
    4. Newman G.
    (2017). Hurricane recovery and ecological resilience: Measuring the impacts of wetland alteration post Hurricane Ike on the upper TX coast. Journal of Environmental Management, 60(6), 1116–26.
    OpenUrl
  55. ↵
    1. Rinaldo S. B.,
    2. Davis D. F.,
    3. Borunda J.
    (2015). Delivering value to community partners in service-learning projects. Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship, 8(1), 115.
    OpenUrl
  56. ↵
    1. Rufat S.,
    2. Tate E.,
    3. Burton C. G.,
    4. Maroof A. S.
    2015). Social vulnerability to floods: Review of case studies and implications for measurement. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 14, 470–86.
    OpenUrl
  57. ↵
    1. Schubert J. E.,
    2. Burns M. J.,
    3. Fletcher T. D.,
    4. Sanders B. F.
    2017). A framework for the case-specific assessment of green infrastructure in mitigating urban flood hazards. Advances in Water Resources, 108, 55–68.
    OpenUrl
  58. ↵
    1. Serow R. C.
    (2014). Research and evaluation on service-learning: The case for holistic assessment. In Waterman A. S. (Ed.), Service-learning: Applications from the research (pp. 29–40). New York: Routledge.
  59. ↵
    1. Shafique R.,
    2. Kim R.
    (2017). Green stormwater infrastructure with low impact development concept: A review of current research. Desalination and Water Treatment, 83, 16–29.
    OpenUrl
  60. ↵
    1. Shiel C.,
    2. Leal Filho W.,
    3. do Paço A.,
    4. Brandli L.
    (2016). Evaluating the engagement of universities in capacity building for sustainable development in local communities. Evaluation and program planning, 54, 123–134.
    OpenUrl
  61. ↵
    1. Sister C.,
    2. Wolch J.,
    3. Wilson J.
    (2010). Got green? Addressing environmental justice in park provision. GeoJournal, 75(3), 229–48.
    OpenUrl
  62. ↵
    1. Sohn W.,
    2. Kim J. H.,
    3. Newman G.
    (2014). A BLUEprint for Stormwater infrastructure design: implementation and efficacy of LID. Landscape Research Record, 2(1), 50–61.
    OpenUrl
  63. ↵
    1. Sparkman S. A.,
    2. Hogan D. M.,
    3. Hopkins K. G.,
    4. Loperfido J. V.
    2017). Modeling watershed-scale impacts of stormwater management with traditional versus low impact development design. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 53(5), 1081–94.
    OpenUrl
  64. ↵
    1. Steinke P.,
    2. Fitch P
    . (2003). Using written protocols to measure service learning outcomes. In Billig S. H., Eyler J. (Eds.), Deconstructing service learning: Research exploring context, participation, and impacts (pp. 171–94). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
  65. ↵
    1. Stevens M.,
    2. Berke P.,
    3. Song Y.
    (2010). Public participation in local government review of development proposals in hazardous locations: Does it matter, and what do local government planners have to do with it? Environmental Management, 45(2), 320–35.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Thiagarajan M.,
    2. Newman G.,
    3. Van Zandt S.
    (2018). The projected impact of a neighborhood-scaled green infrastructure retrofit. Sustainability, 10(10), 3665.
    OpenUrl
  67. ↵
    1. Tyler J.
    (2016). Sustainable hazard mitigation: Exploring the importance of green infrastructure in building disaster resilient communities. Consilience, 15(1), 134–45.
    OpenUrl
    1. U.S. Census Bureau.
    (2016). State & county quickfacts: Harris County, TX. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/harriscountytexas
  68. ↵
    1. U.S. Department of Education
    . (2006). A test of leadership: Charting the future of U.S. higher education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
  69. ↵
    1. U.S. Energy Information Administration (U.S. EIA)
    . (2010). Annual energy outlook 2010 with projections to 2035. Retrieved from https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/archive/aeo10/pdf/0383(2010).pdf
  70. ↵
    1. Van Zandt S.
    (2007). Racial/ethnic differences in housing outcomes for first-time, low-income home buyers: Findings from a national homeownership education program. Housing Policy Debate, 18(2), 431–74. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2007.9521606
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  71. ↵
    1. Van Zandt S.,
    2. Peacock W. G.,
    3. Henry D. W.,
    4. Grover H.,
    5. Highfield W. E.,
    6. Brody S. D.
    2012). Mapping social vulnerability to enhance housing and neighborhood resilience. Housing Policy Debate, 22(1), 29–55. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2011.624528
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  72. ↵
    1. Vaughan K. B.,
    2. Kaczynski A. T.,
    3. Wilhelm Stanis S. A.,
    4. Besenyi G. M.,
    5. Bergstrom R.,
    6. Heinrich K. M.
    2013). Exploring the distribution of park availability, features, and quality across Kansas City, Missouri by income and race/ethnicity: An environmental justice investigation. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 45(suppl 1), S28–38.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Wang M. Q.,
    2. Santini D. J.
    (1995). Monetary values of air pollutant emissions in various US regions. Transportation Research Record, (1475).
  73. ↵
    1. Wen M.,
    2. Zhang X.,
    3. Harris C. D.,
    4. Holt J. B.,
    5. Croft J. B.
    2013). Spatial disparities in the distribution of parks and green spaces in the USA. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 45(suppl 1), S18–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. ↵
    1. Wilson S. M.,
    2. Heaney C. D.,
    3. Cooper J.,
    4. Wilson O.
    (2008). Built environment issues in unserved and underserved African-American neighborhoods in North Carolina. Environmental Justice, 1(2), 63–72. doi: 10.1089/env.2008.0509
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  75. ↵
    1. Wolch J. R.,
    2. Byrne J.,
    3. Newell J. P.
    2014). Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities “just green enough.” Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 234–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  76. ↵
    1. Wright B.
    (2011). Race, place, and the environment in the after-math of Katrina. Anthropology of Work Review, 32(1), 4–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1417.2011.01052.x
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  77. ↵
    1. Wright T. J.,
    2. Liu Y.,
    3. Carroll N. J.,
    4. Ahiablame L. M.,
    5. Engel B. A.
    2016). Retrofitting LID practices into existing neighborhoods: Is it worth it? Environmental Management, 57(4), 856–67.
    OpenUrl
  78. ↵
    1. Yang B.,
    2. Shujuan L.,
    3. Binder C.
    (2016). A research frontier in landscape architecture: Landscape performance and assessment of social benefits. Landscape Research, 41(3), 314–29.
    OpenUrl
    1. Yang J.,
    2. Yu Q.,
    3. Gong P.
    (2008). Quantifying air pollution removal by green roofs in Chicago. Atmospheric environment, 42(31), 7266–7273.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  79. ↵
    1. Young R. F.
    (2011). Planting the living city: Best practices in planning green infrastructure—Results from major us cities. Journal of the American Planning Association, 77(4), 368–81.
    OpenUrl
  80. ↵
    1. Zahmatkesh Z.,
    2. Burian S. J.,
    3. Karamouz M.,
    4. Tavakol-Davani H.,
    5. Goharian E.
    (2014). Low-impact development practices to mitigate climate change effects on urban stormwater runoff: Case study of New York City. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 141(1), 04014043.
    OpenUrl
  81. ↵
    1. Zellner M.,
    2. Massey D.,
    3. Minor E.,
    4. Gonzalez-Meler M.
    (2016). Exploring the effects of green infrastructure placement on neighborhood-level flooding via spatially explicit simulations. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 59, 116–28.
    OpenUrl
  82. ↵
    1. Zhan W.,
    2. Chui T. M.
    2016). Evaluating the life cycle net benefit of low impact development in a city. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 20, 295–304. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.09.006
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Landscape Journal: 37 (2)
Landscape Journal
Vol. 37, Issue 2
1 Jan 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Landscape Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Leveling the Landscape: Landscape Performance as a Green Infrastructure Evaluation Tool for Service-Learning Products
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Landscape Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Landscape Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Leveling the Landscape: Landscape Performance as a Green Infrastructure Evaluation Tool for Service-Learning Products
Marccus D. Hendricks, Galen Newman, Siyu Yu, Jennifer Horney
Landscape Journal Jan 2018, 37 (2) 19-39; DOI: 10.3368/lj.37.2.19

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Leveling the Landscape: Landscape Performance as a Green Infrastructure Evaluation Tool for Service-Learning Products
Marccus D. Hendricks, Galen Newman, Siyu Yu, Jennifer Horney
Landscape Journal Jan 2018, 37 (2) 19-39; DOI: 10.3368/lj.37.2.19
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • LITERATURE REVIEW
    • RESEARCH OBJECTIVE
    • METHODS
    • FINDINGS
    • CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION
    • AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION
    • PEER REVIEW STATEMENT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Reflections on Applying Interdisciplinary Collaboration, Cross‐Cultural Exchange, and Community Engagement in Studio‐Based Learning
  • Where Will Climate Migrants Go and How Will We Support Them?
  • Making the Switch
Show more Peer-Reviewed Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Social vulnerability
  • site planning
  • environmental justice
  • resilience
UW Press logo

© 2026 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire