Online Learning in Landscape Architecture: Assessing Issues, Preferences, and Student Needs in Design-Related Online Education

REFERENCES

1. ↵
   1. Allen I. E.,
   2. Seaman J.

   (2016). Online report card: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group.
2. ↵
   1. Bender D. M.

   (2005). Developing a collaborative multidisciplinary online design course. Journal of Educators Online, 2(2), 1–12.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Bender D. M.,
   2. Good L.

   (2003). Interior design faculty intentions to adopt distance education. Journal of Interior Design, 29(1–2), 66–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1668.2003.tb00385.x

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. ↵
   1. Bender D. M.,
   2. Vredevoogd J. D.

   (2006). Using online education technologies to support studio instruction. Educational Technology & Society, 9(4), 114–122.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Bender D. M.,
   2. Wood B. J.,
   3. Vredevoogd J. D.

   (2004). Teaching time: Distance education versus classroom instruction. American Journal of Distance Education, 18(2), 103–14. doi: 10.1207/s15389286ajde1802_4

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. ↵
   1. Broadfoot O.,
   2. Bennett R.

   (2003). Design studios: Online? Comparing traditional face-to-face design studio education with modern internet-based design studios. Presented at the Apple University Consortium.
7. ↵
   1. Brown S.,
   2. Cruickshank I.

   (2003). The virtual studio. International Journal of Architectural Research, 22(3), 281–88.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Budd J.,
   2. Vanka S.,
   3. Runton A.

   (1999). The ID-Online asynchronous learning network: A “virtual studio” for interdisciplinary design collaboration. Digital Creativity, 10(4), 205–14. doi: 10.1076/digc.10.4.205.3233

   OpenUrlCrossRef
9. ↵
   1. Chapman K. J.,
   2. Lupton R. A.

   (2004). Academic dishonesty in a global educational market: A comparison of Hong Kong and American university business students. International Journal of Educational Management, 18(7), 425–35. doi: 10.1108/09513540410563130

   OpenUrlCrossRef
10. ↵
    1. Cheng N.

    (1998, March). Digital identity in the virtual design studio. In Proceedings of the 86th Associated Collegiate Schools of Architecture’s Annual Meeting. Cleveland, OH. Retrieved April (Vol. 23).
11. ↵
    1. Choy S.

    (2002). Nontraditional undergraduates: Findings from the Condition of Education 2002. NCES 2002–012. National Center for Education Statistics.
12. ↵
    1. Christensen C.,
    2. Eyring H. J.

    (2011). The innovative university: Changing the DNA of higher education from the inside out. New York: John Wiley.
13. ↵
    1. Chudzicka-Czupała A.,
    2. Lupina-Wegener A.,
    3. Borter S.,
    4. Hapon N.

    (2013). Students’ attitude toward cheating in Switzerland, Ukraine and Poland. New Educational Review, 32(2), 66–76.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Dale J. S.

    (2006). A technology-based online design curriculum. Retrieved from: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/228611136_A_technology-based_online_design_curriculum
15. ↵
    1. Dave B.,
    2. Danahy J.

    (2000). Virtual study abroad and exchange studio. Automation in Construction, 9(1), 57–71. doi: 10.1016/S0926-5805(99)00048-5

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. ↵
    1. George B. H.

    (2017). A study of traditional discussion boards and social media within an online landscape architecture course. Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, 13(1), 16–25.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. George B. H.

    (2018). Learning to draw: An assessment of an online landscape architecture basic graphics course. Landscape Journal, 37(1), 22–37.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. George B. H.,
    2. Shelton B.,
    3. Walker A.

    (2017). Barriers to the adoption of online design education within North American collegiate landscape architecture programs. Landscape Review, 17(1), 15–29.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Grijalva T. C.,
    2. Nowell C.,
    3. Kerkvliet J.

    (2006). Academic honesty and online courses. College Student Journal, 40(1), 180–86.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Haag P. W.

    (2015). The challenges of career and technical education concurrent enrollment: An administrative perspective. New Directions for Community Colleges, 169, 51–58. doi: 10.1002/cc.20132

    OpenUrlCrossRef
21. ↵
    1. Ham J. J.,
    2. Schnable M. A.

    (2011). Web 2.0 virtual design studio: Social networking as facilitator of design education. Architectural Science Review, 54(2), 108–16. doi: 10.1080/00038628.2011.582369

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. ↵
    1. Harasim L.

    (2000). Shift happens: Online education as a new paradigm in learning. Internet and Higher Education, 3(1–2), 41–61. doi: 10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00032-4

    OpenUrlCrossRef
23. ↵
    1. Kennedy K.,
    2. Nowak S.,
    3. Raghuraman R.,
    4. Thomas J.,
    5. Davis S. F.

    (2000). Academic dishonesty and distance learning: Student and faculty views. College Student Journal, 34(2), 309–14.

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. King C. G.,
    2. Guyette R. W. Jr.,
    3. Piotrowski C.

    (2009). Online exams and cheating: An empirical analysis of business students’ views. Journal of Educators Online, 6(1), n1.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Kondracki N. L.,
    2. Wellman N. S.,
    3. Amundson D. R.

    (2002). Content analysis: Review of methods and their applications in nutrition education. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 34(4), 224–30. doi: 10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60097-3

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. ↵
    1. Kvan T.

    (2001). The pedagogy of virtual design studios. Automation in Construction, 10(3), 345–53. doi: 10.1016/S0926-5805(00)00051-0

    OpenUrlCrossRef
27. ↵
    1. Levine S. L.,
    2. Wake W. K.

    (2000). Hybrid teaching: Design studios in virtual space (vol. 1). In Proceedings of the National Conference onLiberal Arts and the Education of Artists. New York: School of Visual Arts.
28. ↵
    1. Li M.-H.

    (2007). Lessons learned from web-enhanced teaching in landscape architecture studios. International Journal on E-Learning, 6(2), 205–12.

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Li M.-H.,
    2. Murphy M. D.

    (2004). Assessing the effect of supplemental web-based learning in two landscape construction courses. Landscape Review, 9(1), 157–61.

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. Lokken F.,
    2. Mullins C.

    (2014). 2013 distance education survey results. Washington, DC: Instructional Technology Council.
31. ↵
    1. Lupton R. A.,
    2. Chapman K. J.

    (2002). Russian and American college students’ attitudes, perceptions and tendencies towards cheating. Educational Research, 44(1), 17–27. doi: 10.1080/00131880110081080

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
32. ↵
    1. Maher M. L.,
    2. Simoff S.

    (1999). Variations on the virtual design studio. In Proceedings of Fourth International Workshop on CSCW in Design. Compiègne, France.
33. ↵
    1. Maher M. L.,
    2. Simoff S.,
    3. Cicognani A.

    (1996). The potential and current limitations in a virtual design studio. Key Centre of Design Computing, Department of Architecture and Design Science, Sydney, Australia. Retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/13835912/Teaching_Design_from_a_distance_a_case_study_of_Virtual_Design_Studio_teaching_via_a_Social_Network
34. ↵
    1. Maher M. L.,
    2. Bilda Z.,
    3. Gül L. F.

    (2006). Impact of collaborative virtual environments on design behavior. In Proceedings of Design Computing and Cognition ’06. Springer Netherlands.
35. ↵
    1. Matthews D.,
    2. Weigand J.

    (2001). Collaborative design using the internet: A case study. Journal of Interior Design, 27(1), 45–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1668.2001.tb00365.x

    OpenUrlCrossRef
36. ↵
    1. Newman G.,
    2. Kim J. H.,
    3. Lee R. J.,
    4. Brown B.,
    5. Huston S.

    (2016). The perceived effects of flipped teaching on knowledge acquisition. Journal of Effective Teaching, 16(1), 52–71.

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Niculae R. L.

    (2011). The virtual architectural studio—an experiment of online cooperation. Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, 1(1), 38–46.

    OpenUrl
38. ↵
    1. Olt M. R.

    (2002). Ethics and distance education: Strategies for minimizing academic dishonesty in online assessment. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5(3), 1–7.

    OpenUrl
39. ↵
    1. Paechter M.,
    2. Maier B.

    (2010). Online or face-to-face? Students’ experiences and preferences in e-learning. Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 292–97. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.09.004

    OpenUrlCrossRef
40. ↵
    1. Park N.,
    2. Ko Y.

    (2012). Computer education’s teaching-learning methods using educational programming language based on STEAM education. In Park James J., Zomaya Albert, Yeo Sang-Soo, Sahni Sartaj (Eds.), Network and Parallel Computing (pp. 320–27). Berlin: Springer.
41. ↵
    1. Pritchard K.,
    2. Crankshaw N.,
    3. Foster K.,
    4. Matthews L.

    (2018). Landscape architecture online: Accreditation standard for online landscape architecture education. Panel presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Council of Educators in Landscape Architecture. Blacksburg, VA.
42. ↵
    1. Pritchard K.,
    2. Martinez N.

    (2017). Summary of 2017 annual reports: Landscape Architecture Accreditation Board (LAAB). Retrieved from https://www.asla.org/uploadedFiles/CMS/Education/Accreditation/LAAB2017Summary101517.pdf
43. ↵
    1. R Core Team.

    (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.r-project.org/
44. ↵
    1. Radclyffe-Thomas N.

    (2008). White heat or blue screen? Digital technology in art & design education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 27(2), 158–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-8070.2008.00571.x

    OpenUrlCrossRef
45. ↵
    1. Rogers C. F.

    (2006). Faculty perceptions about e-cheating during online testing. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 22(2), 206–12.

    OpenUrl
46. ↵
    1. Rozycki E. G.

    (2006). Cheating impossible: Transforming educational values. Educational Horizons, 84(3), 136–38.

    OpenUrl
47. ↵
    1. Saghafi M. R.,
    2. Franz J.,
    3. Crowther P.

    (2012a). Perceptions of physical versus virtual design studio education. International Journal of Architectural Research, 6(1), 6–22. doi: 10.26687/archnet-ijar.v6i1.74

    OpenUrlCrossRef
48. ↵
    1. Saghafi M. R.,
    2. Franz J.,
    3. Crowther P.

    (2012b). A holistic blended design studio model: A basis for exploring and expanding learning opportunities. In Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference (SITE 2012). Austin, TX.
49. ↵
    1. Sagun A.,
    2. Demirkan H.,
    3. Goktepe M.

    (2001). A framework for the design studio in web-based education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 20(3), 332–42. doi: 10.1111/1468-5949.00282

    OpenUrlCrossRef
50. ↵
    1. Schön D. A.

    (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
51. ↵
    1. Schön D. A.

    (1985). The design studio: An exploration of its traditions and potentials. London: Royal Institute of British Architects.
52. ↵
    1. Simoff S.,
    2. Maher M. L.

    (1997). Design education via web-based virtual environments. In Proceedings of the Fourth Congress of Computing in Civil Engineering. New York: ASCE.
53. ↵
    1. Srivastava A.,
    2. Thomson S. B.

    (2009). Framework analysis: A qualitative methodology for applied policy research. Journal of Administration and Governance, 72(2009).
54. ↵
    1. Wang T.

    (2011). Designing for designing: Information and communication technologies (ICTs) and professional education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 30(2), 188–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-8070.2011.01675.x

    OpenUrlCrossRef