Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • ASLA Research Grant
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Ecological Restoration
    • Land Economics
    • Native Plants Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Landscape Journal
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Ecological Restoration
    • Land Economics
    • Native Plants Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Landscape Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • ASLA Research Grant
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticlePeer-Reviewed Articles

Interactive Deep Maps and Spatial Narratives for Landscape Conservation and Public Engagement

Francis R. Eanes, Janet M. Silbernagel, Patrick Robinson and David A. Hart
Landscape Journal, January 2019, 38 (1-2) 7-24; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.38.1-2.7
Francis R. Eanes
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Janet M. Silbernagel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrick Robinson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David A. Hart
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Allen T. F. H.,
    2. Tainter J. A.,
    3. Pires J. C.,
    4. Hoekstra T. W.
    (2001). Dragnet ecology—“Just the facts, ma’am”: The privilege of science in a postmodern world. Bioscience, 51(6), 475–485.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Anderson N. M.,
    2. Williams K. J. H.,
    3. Ford R. M.
    (2013). Community perceptions of plantation forestry: The association between place meanings and social representations of a contentious rural land use. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 121–136.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    1. Arias E. G.,
    2. Fischer G.
    (2000). Boundary objects: Their role in articulating the task at hand and making information relevant to it. Paper presented at the International ICSC Symposium on Interactive & Collaborative Computing, University of Wollongong, Australia.
  4. ↵
    1. Armitage D.,
    2. de Loe R.,
    3. Plummer R.
    (2012). Environmental governance and its implications for conservation practice. Conservation Letters, 5(4), 245–255.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Baker J. P.,
    2. Hulse D. W.,
    3. Gregory S. V.,
    4. White D.,
    5. Van Sickle J.,
    6. Berger P. A.,
    7. Dole D.,
    8. Schumaker N. H.
    (2004). Alternative futures for the Willamette River Basin, Oregon. Ecological Applications, 14(2), 313–324.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Berkes F.
    (2004). Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology, 18(3), 621–630.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    1. Bodenhamer D.
    (2015). Narrating space and place. In Bodenhamer D. J., Corrigan J., Harris T. M. (Eds.), Deep maps and spatial narratives (pp. 7–27). Indiana University Press.
  8. ↵
    1. Bodenhamer D.
    (2013). Beyond GIS: Geospatial technologies and the future of history. In von Lunen C. B. T. A. (Ed.), History and GIS: Epistemologies, considerations and reflections (pp. 1–12). Springer.
  9. ↵
    1. Bodenhamer D. J.,
    2. Corrigan J.,
    3. Harris T. M.
    (2010). The spatial humanities: GIS and the future of humanities scholarship. Indiana University Press.
  10. ↵
    1. Bolte J. P.,
    2. Hulse D. W.,
    3. Gregory S. V.,
    4. Smith C.
    (2007). Modeling biocomplexity—actors, landscapes and alternative futures. Environmental Modelling & Software, 22(5), 570–579.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Bowker G. C.,
    2. Star S. L.
    (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT Press.
  12. ↵
    1. Brabyn L.,
    2. Mark D. M.
    (2011). Using viewsheds, GIS, and a landscape classification to tag landscape photographs. Applied Geography, 31(3), 1115–1122.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Brown G.
    (2004). Mapping spatial attributes in survey research for natural resource management: methods and applications. Society and Natural Resources, 18(1), 17–39.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Brown G.,
    2. Raymond C. M.,
    3. Corcoran J.
    (2015). Mapping and measuring place attachment. Applied Geography, 57, 42–53.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Brown G.,
    2. Weber D.
    (2013). A place-based approach to conservation management using public participation GIS (PPGIS). Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56(4), 455–473.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Caquard S.
    (2013). Cartography I: Mapping narrative cartography. Progress in Human Geography, 37(1), 135–144.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. ↵
    1. Caquard S.,
    2. Cartwright W.
    (2014). Narrative cartography: From mapping stories to the narrative of maps and mapping. Cartographic Journal, 51(2), 101–106.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Carpenter S. R.,
    2. Mooney H. A.,
    3. Agard J.,
    4. Capistrano D.,
    5. DeFries R. S.,
    6. Diaz S.,
    7. Dietz T.,
    8. Daruaiappah A. K.,
    9. Oteng-Yeboah A.,
    10. Pereira H. M.,
    11. Perrings C.,
    12. Reid W. V.,
    13. Sarukhan J.,
    14. Scholes R. J.,
    15. Whyte A.
    (2009). Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(5), 1305–1312.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Carpenter S. R.,
    2. DeFries R.,
    3. Dietz T.,
    4. Mooney H. A.,
    5. Polasky S.,
    6. Reid W. V.,
    7. Scholes R. J.
    (2006). Millennium ecosystem assessment: research needs. Science, 314(5797), 257–258.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Chan K. M. A.,
    2. Satterfield T.,
    3. Goldstein J.
    (2012). Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecological Economics, 74, 8–18.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    1. Chrisman N. R.
    (1999). Geographic objects with indeterminate boundaries. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 13(6), 615–616.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Conrad C. C.,
    2. Hilchey K. G.
    (2011). A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: Issues and opportunities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 176(1–4), 273–291.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    1. Convis C. L.
    (2001). Conservation geography: Case studies in GIS, computer mapping, and activism. ESRI Press.
  24. ↵
    1. Corner J.
    (1999). The agency of mapping: Speculation, critique, and invention. In Cosgrove C. (Ed.), Mappings (pp. 213–252). Reaktion.
  25. ↵
    1. Cronon W.
    (1992). A place for stories—Nature, history, and narrative. Journal of American History, 78(4), 1347–1376.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    1. Cronon W.
    (2013). Storytelling. Retrieved from http://www.historians.org/about-aha-and-membership/aha-history-and-archives/presidential-addresses/william-cronon
  27. ↵
    1. Cumming G.
    (2007). Global biodiversity scenarios and landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology, 22(5), 671–685.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    1. Daniel T. C.,
    2. Muhar A.,
    3. Arnberger A.,
    4. Aznar O.,
    5. Boyd J. W.,
    6. Chan K. M. A.,
    7. Costanza R.,
    8. Elmqvist T.,
    9. Flint C. G.,
    10. Gobster P. H.,
    11. Gret-Regamey A.,
    12. Lave R.,
    13. Muhar S.,
    14. Penker M.,
    15. Schauppenlehner T.,
    16. Sikor T.,
    17. Soloviy I.,
    18. Spierenburg M.,
    19. Taczanowska K.,
    20. Tam J.,
    21. von der Dunk A.
    (2012). Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(23), 8812–8819.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Daniels S.,
    2. Walker G.
    (2001). Working through environmental conflict: The collaborative learning approach. Praeger.
  30. ↵
    1. DeLyser D.,
    2. Sui D.
    (2014). Crossing the qualitative-quantitative chasm III: Enduring methods, open geography, participatory research, and the fourth paradigm. Progress in Human Geography, 38(2), 294–307.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. ↵
    1. Desimini J.,
    2. Waldheim C.
    (2016). Cartographic grounds: Projecting the landscape imaginary. Chronicle.
  32. ↵
    1. Devine-Wright P.
    (2011). Place attachment and public acceptance of renewable energy: A tidal energy case study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(4), 336–343.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. ↵
    1. Dominowski R. L.,
    2. Dallob P.
    (1995). Insight and problem solving. In Sternberg R. J., Davidson J. E. (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 33–62). MIT Press.
  34. ↵
    1. Drewes A.,
    2. Silbernagel J.
    (2006). Setting up an integrative research approach for sustaining wild rice (Zizania palustris) in the Upper Great Lakes Region of North America. In Tress G. T. B., Fry G., Opdam P. (Ed.), From Landscape Research to Landscape Planning: Aspects of Integration, Education, and Application (vol. 12) (pp. 377–386). Springer.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Elmqvist N.,
    2. Moere A. V.,
    3. Jetter H. C.,
    4. Cernea D.,
    5. Reiterer H.,
    6. Jankun-Kelly T. J.
    (2011). Fluid interaction for information visualization. Information Visualization, 10(4), 327–340.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. ↵
    1. Elwood S.
    (2006). Beyond cooptation or resistance: Urban spatial politics, community organizations, and GIS-based spatial narratives. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(2), 323–341.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  37. ↵
    1. Feurt C.
    (2008). Collaborative learning for ecosystem management. Retrieved from https://www.wellsreserve.org/writable/files/archive/downloads/collaborative_learning_guide.pdf
  38. ↵
    1. Fischer G.,
    2. Reeves B. N.
    (1995). Creating success: Models of cooperative problem solving. In Baecker R. M., Grudin J., Buxton W. A. S., Greenberg S. (Eds.), Readings in human-computer interaction: Toward the year 2000 (pp. 822–831). Morgan-Kaufmann.
  39. ↵
    1. Folke C.,
    2. Carpenter S.,
    3. Elmqvist T.,
    4. Gunderson L.,
    5. Holling C. S.,
    6. Walker B.
    (2002). Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio, 31(5), 437–440.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Fortin M. J.,
    2. Dale M. R. T.
    (2005). Spatial analysis: A guide for ecologists. Cambridge University Press.
  41. ↵
    1. Gifford R.
    (2014). Environmental psychology matters. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 541–579.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. ↵
    1. Gilmore M. P.,
    2. Young J. C.
    (2012). The use of participatory mapping in ethnobiological research, biocultural conservation, and community empowerment: A case study from the Peruvian Amazon. Journal of Ethnobiology, 32(1), 6–29.
    OpenUrl
  43. ↵
    1. Gould R. K.,
    2. Klain S. C.,
    3. Ardoin N. M.,
    4. Satterfield T.,
    5. Woodside U.,
    6. Hannahs N.,
    7. Daily G. K.,
    8. Chan K. M.
    (2015). A protocol for eliciting nonmaterial values through a cultural ecosystem services frame. Conservation Biology, 29(2), 575–586.
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    1. Hallam J.,
    2. Roberts L.
    (2011). Mapping, memory and the city: Archives, databases and film historiography. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 14(3), 355–372.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  45. ↵
    1. Harris T.M.
    (2015). Deep Geography—Deep Mapping: Spatial Storytelling and a Sense of Place. In Bodenhamer D. J., Corrigan J., Harris T. M. (Eds.), Deep Maps and Spatial Narratives, (pp. 28–53). Indiana University Press.
  46. ↵
    1. Heat-Moon W. L.
    (1991). PrairyErth (a deep map): An epic history of the tallgrass prairie country. Houghton Mifflin.
  47. ↵
    1. Hertz T.,
    2. Schluter M.
    (2015). The SES-Framework as boundary object to address theory orientation in social-ecological system research: The SES-TheOr approach. Ecological Economics, 116, 12–24.
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    1. Hulse D. W.,
    2. Branscomb A.,
    3. Payne S. G.
    (2004). Envisioning alternatives: Using citizen guidance to map future land and water use. Ecological Applications, 14(2), 325–341.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  49. ↵
    1. Johnson D. B.
    (1982). Spatial modeling and deixis: Nabokov’s invitation to a beheading. Poetics Today, 3(1), 81–98.
    OpenUrl
  50. ↵
    1. Juhasz A.,
    2. Balsamo A.
    (2012). An idea whose time is here: FemTechNet—A distributed online collaborative course (DOCC). Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology, 1(1). doi:10.7264/N3MW2F2J
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  51. ↵
    1. Karcher S. L.
    (1986). Les jeux sont blancs: Pierre Garnier, spatial poetry, and the alchemical albedo. French Forum, 11(3), 353–366.
    OpenUrl
  52. ↵
    1. Kitchin R.,
    2. Dodge M.
    (2007). Rethinking maps. Progress in Human Geography, 31(3), 331–344.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  53. ↵
    1. Kong T. M.,
    2. Kellner K.,
    3. Austin D. E.,
    4. Els Y.,
    5. Orr B. J.
    (2015). Enhancing participatory evaluation of land management through photo elicitation and photovoice. Society & Natural Resources, 28(2), 212–229.
    OpenUrl
  54. ↵
    1. Kwan M. P.
    (2002). Feminist visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a method in feminist geographic research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(4), 645–661.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  55. ↵
    1. Kwan M. P.,
    2. Ding G. X.
    (2008). Geonarrative: Extending geographic information systems for narrative analysis in qualitative and mixed-method research. Professional Geographer, 60(4), 443–465.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  56. ↵
    1. Lackey R. T.
    (1998). Seven pillars of ecosystem management. Landscape and Urban Planning, 40(1–3), 21–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  57. ↵
    1. Lave J.,
    2. Wenger E.
    (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
  58. ↵
    1. Leopold A.
    (1949). A Sand County almanac, and Sketches here and there. Oxford University Press.
  59. ↵
    1. Lewicka M.
    (2011). Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(3), 207–230.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  60. ↵
    1. Lin W.
    (2013). Situating performative neogeography: Tracing, mapping, and performing “Everyone’s East Lake.” Environment and Planning A, 45(1), 37–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  61. ↵
    1. Lynam T.,
    2. De Jong W.,
    3. Sheil D.,
    4. Kusumanto T.,
    5. Evans K.
    (2007). A review of tools for incorporating community knowledge, preferences, and values into decision making in natural resources management. Ecology and Society, 12(1).
  62. ↵
    1. Mace G. M.
    (2014). Whose conservation? Science, 345(6204), 1558–1560.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. ↵
    1. Maher S. N.
    (2014). Deep map country: Literary cartography of the Great Plains. University of Nebraska Press.
  64. ↵
    1. Margenot J. B. III.
    (1989). Character questing in Juan Benet’s “Volverás a Región.” Modern Language Studies, 19(3), 52–62.
    OpenUrl
  65. ↵
    1. Martín-López B.,
    2. Montes C.
    (2015). Restoring the human capacity for conserving biodiversity: A social–ecological approach. Sustainability Science, 10(4), 699–706.
    OpenUrl
  66. ↵
    1. Marín S.
    (1995). Spatial narrative: Aural and visual construction in the musical narrative of minority discourse. Studies in American Indian Literatures, 7(4), 9–34.
    OpenUrl
  67. ↵
    1. Massey D.
    (1994). Space, place, and gender. Polity Press.
  68. ↵
    1. Matthews S. A.,
    2. Detwiler J. E.,
    3. Burton L. M.
    (2005). Geoethnography: Coupling geographic information analysis techniques with ethnographic methods in urban research. Cartographica, 40(4), 75–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  69. ↵
    1. McLucas C.
    (2001). Deep mapping. Retrieved from http://cliffordmclucas.info/deep-mapping.html
    1. Monmonier M.
    (1996). How to lie with maps. University of Chicago Press.
  70. ↵
    1. Mutenje M. J.,
    2. Ortmann G. F.,
    3. Ferrer S. R. D.
    (2011). Management of non-timber forestry products extraction: Local institutions, ecological knowledge and market structure in south-eastern Zimbabwe. Ecological Economics, 70(3), 454–461.
    OpenUrl
  71. ↵
    1. Norman D. A.
    (2004). Emotional design. Basic Books.
  72. ↵
    1. Olsen E.,
    2. Kleiven A.,
    3. Skjoldal H.,
    4. von Quillfeldt C. H.
    (2011). Place-based management at different spatial scales. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 15(2), 257–269.
    OpenUrl
  73. ↵
    1. Ortega A. A. C.
    (2012). Desktop and beyond: Neoliberal production of suburban space in Manila’s fringe. Urban Geography, 33(8), 1118–1143.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  74. ↵
    1. Ostrom E.
    (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419–422.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  75. ↵
    1. Ostrom E.,
    2. Burger J.,
    3. Field C. B.,
    4. Norgaard R. B.,
    5. Policansky D.
    (1999). Sustainability—Revisiting the commons: Local lessons, global challenges. Science, 284(5412), 278–282.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  76. ↵
    1. Pavlovskaya M.
    (2009). Non-quantitative GIS. In Elwood S., Cope M. (Eds.), Qualitative GIS: A mixed methods approach to integrating qualitative research and geographic information systems (pp. 13–37). Sage Publications.
  77. ↵
    1. Peterson G.,
    2. Cumming G.,
    3. Carpenter S.
    (2003). Scenario planning: A tool for conservation in an uncertain world. Conservation Biology, 17(2), 358–366.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  78. ↵
    1. Pickles J.
    (1995). Representations in an electronic age: Geography, GIS, and democracy. In Pickles J. (Ed.), Ground truth: The social implications of geographic information systems (pp. 1–30). Guilford.
  79. ↵
    1. Plieninger T.,
    2. Dijks S.,
    3. Oteros-Rozas E.,
    4. Bieling C.
    (2013). Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy, 33, 118–129.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  80. ↵
    1. Poole P.
    (1995). Land-based communities, geomatics and biodiversity conservation. Cultural Survival Quarterly, 18(4), 74–76.
    OpenUrl
    1. Powell J. W.
    (1875). Exploration of the Colorado River of the West and its Tributaries. U.S. Government Printing Office.
  81. ↵
    1. Price J.,
    2. Silbernagel J.,
    3. Miller N.,
    4. Swaty R.,
    5. White M.,
    6. Nixon K.
    (2012). Eliciting expert knowledge to inform landscape modeling of conservation scenarios. Ecological Modelling, 229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.09.010
  82. ↵
    1. Reed M. S.,
    2. Graves A.,
    3. Dandy N.,
    4. Posthumus H.,
    5. Hubacek K.,
    6. Morris J.,
    7. Prell C.,
    8. Quinn C. H.,
    9. Stringer L. C.
    (2009). Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1933–1949.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  83. ↵
    1. Roberts J. C.
    (2008). Coordinated multiple views for exploratory geovisualization. In Dodge M., McDerby M., Turner M. (Eds.), Geographic visualization (pp. 25–48). John Wiley & Sons.
  84. ↵
    1. Roth R. E.
    (2013). Interactive maps: What we know and what we need to know. Journal of Spatial Information Science, 2013(6), 59–115.
    OpenUrl
  85. ↵
    1. Schuurman N.
    (2004). GIS: A short introduction. Blackwell.
  86. ↵
    1. Sieber R.
    (2006). Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(3), 491–507.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  87. ↵
    1. Silbernagel J.
    (2005). Bio-regional patterns and spatial narratives for integrative landscape research and design. In Tress B., Tress G., Fry G., Opdam P. (Eds.), From landscape research to landscape planning: Aspects of integration, education and application (pp. 107–118). Springer.
  88. ↵
    1. Silbernagel J.,
    2. Host G.,
    3. Hagley C.,
    4. Hart D.,
    5. Axler R.,
    6. Fortner R.,
    7. Wagler M.
    (2015). Linking place-based science to people through spatial narratives of coastal stewardship. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 19(2), 181–198.
    OpenUrl
  89. ↵
    1. Snyder R.,
    2. Williams D.,
    3. Peterson G.
    (2003). Culture loss and sense of place in resource valuation: Economics, anthropology, and indigenous cultures. In Jentoft S., Minde H., Nilsen R. (Eds.), Indigenous people: Resource management and global rights (pp. 107–123). Eburon.
  90. ↵
    1. Star S. L.,
    2. Griesemer J. R.
    (1989). Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects—Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Ecology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  91. ↵
    1. Stedman R. C.
    (2003). Is it really just a social construction?: The contribution of the physical environment to sense of place. Society & Natural Resources, 16(8), 671–685.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  92. ↵
    1. Stegner W.
    (1962). Wolf Willow: A history, a story, and a memory of the last plains frontier. Viking.
  93. ↵
    1. Sui D.,
    2. DeLyser D.
    (2012). Crossing the qualitative-quantitative chasm I: Hybrid geographies, the spatial turn, and volunteered geographic information (VGI). Progress in Human Geography, 36(1), 111–124.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Thoreau H. D.
    (1908). Walden, or, Life in the woods. J. M. Dent.
  94. ↵
    1. Velasco D.,
    2. Garcia-Llorente M.,
    3. Alonso B.,
    4. Dolera A.,
    5. Palomo I.,
    6. Iniesta-Arandia I.,
    7. Martin-Lopez B.
    (2015). Biodiversity conservation research challenges in the 21st century: A review of publishing trends in 2000 and 2011. Environmental Science & Policy, 54, 90–96.
    OpenUrl
  95. ↵
    1. Wang C.,
    2. Burris M. A.
    (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior, 24(3), 369–387.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  96. ↵
    1. Waylen K. A.,
    2. Fischer A.,
    3. McGowan P. J. K.,
    4. Milner-Gulland E. J.
    (2013). Deconstructing community for conservation: Why simple assumptions are not sufficient. Human Ecology, 41(4), 575–585.
    OpenUrl
  97. ↵
    1. Wendorf R.
    (1985). “Visible Rhetorick”: Izaak Walton and iconic biography. Modern Philology, 82(3), 269–291.
    OpenUrl
  98. ↵
    1. Wenger E.
    (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
  99. ↵
    1. Wilhere G. F.,
    2. Linders M. J.,
    3. Cosentino B. L.
    (2007). Defining alternative futures and projecting their effects on the spatial distribution of wildlife habitats. Landscape and Urban Planning, 79(3–4), 385–400.
    OpenUrl
  100. ↵
    1. Williams D. R.
    (2002). Leisure identities, globalization, and the politics of place. Journal of Leisure Research, 34(4), 351–367.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  101. ↵
    1. Windsor J. E.,
    2. McVey J. A.
    (2005). Annihilation of both place and sense of place: The experience of the Cheslatta T’En Canadian First Nation within the context of large-scale environmental projects. Geographical Journal, 171, 146–165.
    OpenUrl
  102. ↵
    1. Zollner P. A.,
    2. Roberts L. J.,
    3. Gustafson E. J.,
    4. He H. S.,
    5. Radeloff V.
    (2008). Influence of forest planning alternatives on landscape pattern and ecosystem processes in northern Wisconsin, USA. Forest Ecology and Management, 254(3), 429–444.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Landscape Journal: 38 (1-2)
Landscape Journal
Vol. 38, Issue 1-2
1 Jan 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Landscape Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Interactive Deep Maps and Spatial Narratives for Landscape Conservation and Public Engagement
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Landscape Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Landscape Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Interactive Deep Maps and Spatial Narratives for Landscape Conservation and Public Engagement
Francis R. Eanes, Janet M. Silbernagel, Patrick Robinson, David A. Hart
Landscape Journal Jan 2019, 38 (1-2) 7-24; DOI: 10.3368/lj.38.1-2.7

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Interactive Deep Maps and Spatial Narratives for Landscape Conservation and Public Engagement
Francis R. Eanes, Janet M. Silbernagel, Patrick Robinson, David A. Hart
Landscape Journal Jan 2019, 38 (1-2) 7-24; DOI: 10.3368/lj.38.1-2.7
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • WHAT: DEFINITIONS AND KEY FEATURES
    • WHY AND HOW: INTERACTIVITY, NARRATIVES, AND INSIGHT
    • WHO AND WHERE: APPLICATIONS IN LANDSCAPE CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE
    • LOOKING AHEAD: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES
    • AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
    • PEER REVIEW STATEMENT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Gestures in Stone: Pilgrims and the Vernacular Landscape of the Camino de Santiago de Compostela
  • Students’ Perceptions of Campus Green Open Space Patronage in a Nigerian University
  • Experiments in the Desert: The Art and Science of Lightning Along U.S. Route 60
Show more Peer-Reviewed Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Insights
  • interdisciplinary integration
  • social-ecological systems
UW Press logo

© 2025 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire