Research ArticlePeer-Reviewed Articles
Open Access

Design as Research in Landscape Architecture

Steffen Nijhuis and Jeroen de Vries
Landscape Journal, January 2019, 38 (1-2) 87-103; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.38.1-2.87

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Alexander C.,
    2. Ishikawa S.,
    3. Silverstein M.
    (1977). A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. Oxford University Press.
  2. ↵
    1. Armstrong H.
    (1999). Design studios as research: An emerging paradigm for landscape architecture. Landscape Review, 5(2), 5–25.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Boeijen A. van,
    2. Daalhuizen J.,
    3. Schoor R. van der,
    4. Zijlstra J.
    (2014). Delft design guide: Design strategies and methods. BIS.
  4. ↵
    1. Bowring J.
    (1997). Research by design: The refereed studio. Landscape Review, 3(2), 54–55.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Broekmeyer M. E. A.,
    2. Steingröver E. G.
    (2001). Handboek robuuste verbindingen. Alterra.
  6. ↵
    1. Carruth S.
    (2015). Infrastructural urbanism that learns from place: Operationalising meta material practices to guide renewable energy planning in Greenland. Ph.D. diss., Aarhus School of Architecture.
    1. Chenoweth R.,
    2. Chidister M.
    (1983). Attitudes toward research in landscape architecture: A study of the discipline. Landscape Journal, 2(2), 98–113. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.2.2.98
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Creswell J. W.
    (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. Sage.
  9. ↵
    1. Creswell J. W.,
    2. Creswell J. D.
    (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
    1. Creswell J. W.,
    2. Plano Clark V. L.
    (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.
  11. ↵
    1. Cross N.
    (2007). Designerly ways of knowing. Birkhäuser.
  12. ↵
    1. de Jonge J.
    (2009). Landscape architecture between politics and science: An integrative perspective on landscape planning and design in the network society. Blauwdruk. Retrieved from http://edepot.wur.nl/14357
  13. ↵
    1. Deming M. E.,
    2. Swaffield S.
    (2011). Landscape architecture research: Inquiry, strategy, design. Wiley.
  14. ↵
    1. Foqué R.
    (1975). Ontwerpsystemen: Een inleiding tot de ontwerptheorie. Spectrum.
  15. ↵
    1. Gibbons M.,
    2. Limoges C.,
    3. Nowotny H.,
    4. Schwartzman S.,
    5. Scott P.
    (2012). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage.
  16. ↵
    1. Glanville R.
    (2015) The sometimes uncomfortable marriages of design and research. In: Rodgers P., Yee J., (Eds.) The Routledge companion to design research (pp. 9–22). Routledge.
  17. ↵
    1. Gobster P. H.,
    2. Nassauer J. I.,
    3. Nadenicek D. J.
    (2010). Landscape journal and scholarship in landscape architecture: The next 25 years. Landscape Journal, 29(1), 52–57. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.29.1.52
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Groat L.,
    2. Wang D.
    (2013). Architectural research methods. Wiley.
  19. ↵
    1. Grocott L.
    (2010). Design research & reflective practice: The facility of design oriented research to translate practitioner insights into new understandings of design. Ph.D. diss., RMIT University.
  20. ↵
    1. Halprin L.
    (1981). The RSVP cycles: Creative processes in the human environment. Braziller.
  21. ↵
    1. Hamel R.
    (1990). Over het denken van de architect/On designing by architects: een cognitief psychologische beschrijving van het ontwerpproces bij architecten. AHA Books.
  22. ↵
    1. Jones J. C.
    (1992). Design methods (2nd ed.). Van Nostrand Reinhold.
  23. ↵
    1. Kalay Y.
    (2004). Architecture’s new media: Principles, theories, and methods of computer-aided design. MIT Press.
  24. ↵
    1. Klaasen I. T.
    (2004). Knowledge-based design: Developing urban and regional design into a science. Delft University Press.
  25. ↵
    1. KNAW.
    (2010). Quality assessment in the design and engineering disciplines. A systematic framework. Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.
  26. ↵
    1. LaGro J. A. Jr.
    (1999). Research capacity: A matter of semantics? Landscape Journal, 18(2), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.18.2.179
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Lawson B.
    (2008). How designers think. The design process demystified. Architectural Press.
  28. ↵
    1. Lee L.
    (2011). An integrated design strategy for South Australia. Adelaide Thinkers in Residence.
  29. ↵
    1. Lenzholzer S.,
    2. Duchhart I.,
    3. van den Brink A.
    (2017). The relationship between research and design. In van den Brink A., Bruns D., Tobi H., Bell S. (Eds.), Research in landscape architecture: Methods and methodology (pp. 54–64). Routledge.
  30. ↵
    1. Lenzholzer S.,
    2. Nijhuis S.,
    3. Cortesao J.
    (2018). RTD in landscape architecture: A first state of the art. Peer Reviewed Proceedings Design Research Society, 1–13.
  31. ↵
    1. Magnani L.
    (2001). Abduction, reason, and science: Processes of discovery and explanation. Springer.
  32. ↵
    1. Martin B.,
    2. Hanington B.
    (2012). Universele ontwerpmethoden: 100 manieren voor het onderzoeken van complexe problemen, het ontwikkelen van innovatieve ideeën en het ontwerpen van effectieve oplossingen. BIS.
    1. McHarg I. L.
    (1969). Design with nature. Natural History Press.
  34. ↵
    1. Milburn L. S.,
    2. Brown R. D.
    (2003). The relationship between research and design in landscape architecture. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64, 47–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00200-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  35. ↵
    1. Milburn L. S.,
    2. Brown R. D.,
    3. Mulley S. J.,
    4. Hilts S. G.
    (2003). Assessing academic contributions in landscape architecture. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64, 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00204-9
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. ↵
    1. Milburn L. S.,
    2. Brown R. D.,
    3. Paine C.
    (2001). “. . . Research on research”: Research attitudes and behaviors of landscape architecture faculty in North America. Landscape and Urban Planning, 57, 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00188-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  37. ↵
    1. Murphy M.
    (2016). Landscape architecture theory. Island Press.
  38. ↵
    1. Nassauer J. I.,
    2. Opdam P.
    (2008). Design in science: Extending the landscape ecology paradigm. Landscape Ecology, 23, 633–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-008-9226-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  39. ↵
    1. Nijhuis S.
    (2013). New tools: Digital media in landscape architecture. In Vlug J., et al. (Ed.), The need for design (pp. 86–97). Van Hall Larenstein.
  40. ↵
    1. Nijhuis S.
    (2015). GIS-based landscape design research: Stourhead landscape garden as a case study. A+BE. https://doi.org/10.7480/abe.2015.13
  41. ↵
    1. Nijhuis S.,
    2. Bobbink I.
    (2012). Design related research in landscape architecture. Journal of Design Research, 10(4), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1504/JDR.2012.051172
    OpenUrl
  42. ↵
    1. Norberg-Schulz C.
    (1980). Genius loci: Towards a phenomenology of architecture. Rizzoli.
  43. ↵
    1. Nowotny H.,
    2. Scott P.,
    3. Gibbons M. T.
    (2013). Rethinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Wiley.
  44. ↵
    1. Pierce C.
    (1955). Abduction and induction. In Buchler J. (Ed.), Philosophical writings of Pierce (pp. 150–156). Dover Publications.
  45. ↵
    1. Prominski M.
    (2016). Design guidelines. In van den Brink A., Bruns D., Tobi H., Bell S. (Eds.), Research in landscape architecture: Methods and methodology (pp. 194–207). Routledge.
  46. ↵
    1. Rittel H.,
    2. Webber M.
    (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  47. ↵
    1. Robinson K.
    (2013). Buiten de lijntjes: Stimuleer je creativiteit. Spectrum.
  48. ↵
    1. Roozenburg N. F.,
    2. Eekels J.
    (1996). Product design: Fundamentals and methods. Wiley.
  49. ↵
    1. Rowe P. G.
    (1998). Design thinking. MIT Press.
  50. ↵
    1. Schön D.
    (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
  51. ↵
    1. Simon H.
    (1981). The sciences of the artificial (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
  52. ↵
    1. Steenbergen C. M.,
    2. Meeks S.,
    3. Nijhuis S.
    (2008). Composing landscapes: Analysis, typology and experiments for design. Birkhäuser.
  53. ↵
    1. Steenbergen C. M.,
    2. Mihl H.,
    3. Reh W.
    (2002). Introduction: Design research, research by design. In Steenbergen C. M., Mihl H., Reh W., Aerts F. (Eds.), Architectural design and composition (pp. 12–25). Bussum: Thoth.
  54. ↵
    1. Steinitz C.
    (1990). A framework for theory applicable to the education of landscape architects (and other environmental design professionals). Landscape Journal, 9(2), 136–143. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.9.2.136
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    1. Steinitz C.
    (1995). Design is a verb, design is a noun. Landscape Journal, 14(2), 188–200. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.14.2.188
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. ↵
    1. Steinitz C.
    (2012). A framework for geodesign: Changing geography by design. ESRI Press.
  57. ↵
    1. Swaffield S.
    (2016). Case studies. In van den Brink A., Bruns D., Tobi H., Bell S. (Eds.), Research in landscape architecture: Methods and methodology (pp. 105–119). Routledge.
  58. ↵
    1. Thering S.,
    2. Chanse S.
    (2011). The scholarship of transdisciplinary action research: Toward a new paradigm for the planning and design professions. Landscape Journal, 30(1), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.30.1.6
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. ↵
    1. van den Brink A.,
    2. Bruns D.
    (2014) Strategies for enhancing landscape architecture research, Landscape Research, 39:1, 7–20, https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2012.711129
    OpenUrl
    1. van den Brink A.,
    2. Bruns D.,
    3. Tobi H.,
    4. Bell S.
    (2017). Research in landscape architecture: Methods and methodology. Routledge.
  61. ↵
    1. Van Schilfgaarde P.
    (1970). Het kennisbegrip in wetenschap en beroep: Objectiviteit als pretentie. Samsom.
  62. ↵
    1. Verschuren P.
    (2007). De probleemstelling voor een onderzoek. Het Spectrum.
  63. ↵
    1. Von Seggern H.,
    2. Werner J.,
    3. Grosse-Bächle L.
    (2008). Creating knowledge: Innovationsstrategien im Entwerfen urbaner Landschaften = innovation strategies for designing urban landscapes. Jovis.
  64. ↵
    1. Westrik J.,
    2. Büchi H.
    (1989). Stedebouwkundige ontwerpmethoden. Publikatieburo, Faculteit der Bouwkunde, Technische Universiteit.
  65. ↵
    1. Yin R. K.
    (2018). Case study research: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.
  66. ↵
    1. Zeisel J.
    (1981). Inquiry by design: Tools for environment-behavior research. Cambridge University Press.
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Design as Research in Landscape Architecture
Steffen Nijhuis, Jeroen de Vries
Landscape Journal Jan 2019, 38 (1-2) 87-103; DOI: 10.3368/lj.38.1-2.87
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

Keywords