Conceptualizing the Remote Site Experience through Immersive Technology: Unraveling the Santa Marta Favela from Students’ Perspectives

References

1. 1. Antrop, M.

   (2000). Background concepts for integrated landscape analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 77(1–2), 17–28.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
2. 1. Balakrishnan, B., &
   2. Kalisperis, L. N.

   (2009). Design visualization: A media effects approach. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 7(3), 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1260/147807709789621194

   OpenUrlCrossRef
3. 1. Balakrishnan, B.,
   2. Oprean, D.,
   3. Martin, B., &
   4. Smith, M.

   (2012). Virtual reality: Factors determining spatial presence, comprehension and memory. In Y.C. Lin & S. J. Kang (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Construction Applications of Virtual Reality (pp. 451–459). National Taiwan University Press.
4. 1. Balakrishnan, B., &
   2. Sundar, S. S.

   (2011). Where am I? How can I get there? Impact of navigability and narrative transportation on spatial presence. Human–Computer Interaction, 26(3), 161–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2011.601689

   OpenUrl
5. 1. Baudoin, G. S.

   (2016). Interpreting site: Studies in perception, representation, and design. Routledge.
6. 1. Beauregard, R. A

   . (2005). From place to site: Negotiating narrative complexity. In Burns C. & Kahn A.(Eds.), Site matters: Design concepts, histories, and strategies (pp. 39–58). Routledge.
7. 1. Bishop, I. D.,
   2. Ye, W.–S., &
   3. Karadaglis, C.

   (2001). Experiential approaches to perception response in virtual worlds. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54(1–4), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169–2046(01)00130–X

   OpenUrl
8. 1. Bullinger, H. J.,
   2. Bauer, W.,
   3. Wenzel, G., &
   4. Blach, R.

   (2010). Towards user centred design (UCD) in architecture based on immersive virtual environments. Computers in Industry, 61(4), 372–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2009.12.003

   OpenUrl
9. 1. Castronovo, F.,
   2. Nikolic, D.,
   3. Liu, Y., &
   4. Messner, J.

   (2013). An evaluation of immersive virtual reality systems for design reviews. In Dawood N. & Kassem M.(Eds.), 13th International Conference on Construction Applications of Virtual Reality (CONVR) (pp. 22–29). Teesside University.
10. 1. Clarke, H. A. G

    . (2005). Land–scopic regimes: Exploring perspectival representation beyond the “pictorial” project. Landscape Journal, 24(1), 50–68. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.24.1.50

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
11. 1. Damann, N.,
    2. Voets, T., &
    3. Nilius, B.

    (2008). TRPs in our senses. Current Biology, 18(18), R880–R889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.07.063

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 1. Damasio, A.

    (2003). Feelings of emotion and the self. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1001(1), 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1279.014

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 1. Drettakis, G.,
    2. Roussou, M.,
    3. Reche, A., &
    4. Tsingos, N.

    (2007). Design and evaluation of a real–world virtual environment for architecture and urban planning. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 16(3), 318–332. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.16.3.318

    OpenUrlCrossRef
14. 1. Echevarria Sanchez, G. M.,
    2. van Renterghem, T.,
    3. Sun, K.,
    4. de Coensel, B., &
    5. Botteldooren, D.

    (2017). Using virtual reality for assessing the role of noise in the audio–visual design of an urban public space. Landscape and Urban Planning, 167, 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.05.018

    OpenUrl
15. 1. Fereday, J., &
    2. Muir–Cochrane, E.

    (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. 1. Franck, K. A., &
    2. Lepori, R. B.

    (2007). Architecture from the inside out: From the body, the senses, the site, and the community (2nd ed.). Wiley–Academy.
17. 1. Freitas, M. R. D., &
    2. Ruschel, R. C.

    (2013). What is happening to virtual and augmented reality applied to architecture? In R. Stouffs, P. Janssen, S. Roudavski, & B. Tunçer (Eds.), Open systems: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on computer–aided architectural design research in Asia (CAADRIA 2013) (pp. 407–416). CAADRIA and CASA.
18. 1. George, B. H.

    (2016). Distributed site analysis utilizing drones and 360–degree video. Journal of Digital Landscape Architecture, 1, 92–99. https://doi.org/10.14627/537612011

    OpenUrl
19. 1. George, B. H.

    (2018). Using virtual tours to facilitate sustainable site visits of historic sites. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 7(4), 411–422. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2018.v7n4p411

    OpenUrl
20. 1. George, B. H.,
    2. Sleipness, O. R., &
    3. Quebbeman, A.

    (2017). Using virtual reality as a design input: Impacts on collaboration in a university design studio setting. Journal of Digital Landscape Architecture, 2, 252–259. https://doi.org/10.14627/537629026

    OpenUrl
21. 1. Ghadirian, P., &
    2. Bishop, I. D.

    (2008). Integration of augmented reality and GIS: A new approach to realistic landscape visualisation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 86(3–4), 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.03.004

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. 1. Gilbert, S. B.

    (2016). Perceived realism of virtual environments depends on authenticity. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 24(4), 322–324.

    OpenUrl
23. 1. Girot, C.

    (1999). Four trace concepts in landscape architecture. In Corner J. & Balfour A.(Eds.), Recovering landscape: Essays in contemporary landscape architecture (pp. 58–67). Princeton Architectural Press.
24. 1. Hill, D.,
    2. George, B., &
    3. Johnson, T.

    (2019). How virtual reality impacts the landscape architecture design process during the phases of analysis and concept development at the master planning scale. Journal of Digital Landscape Architecture, 4, 266–274. https://doi.org/10.14627/537663029

    OpenUrl
25. 1. Jakle, J. A.

    (1987). The visual elements of landscape. University of Massachusetts Press.
26. 1. Jiven, G., &
    2. Larkham, P. J.

    (2003). Sense of place, authenticity and character: A commentary. Journal of Urban Design, 8(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357480032000064773

    OpenUrlCrossRef
27. 1. Kilteni, K.,
    2. Groten, R., &
    3. Slater, M.

    (2012). The sense of embodiment in virtual reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 21(4), 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1162/PRES_a_00124

    OpenUrlCrossRef
28. 1. Klippel, A.,
    2. Zhao, J.,
    3. Jackson, K. L.,
    4. La Femina, P.,
    5. Stubbs, C.,
    6. Wetzel, R.,
    7. Blair, J.,
    8. Wallgrün, J. O., &
    9. Oprean, D.

    (2019). Transforming earth science education through immersive experiences: Delivering on a long–held promise. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(7), 1745–1771. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119854025

    OpenUrl
29. 1. Koseoglu, E., &
    2. Onder, D. E.

    (2011). Subjective and objective dimensions of spatial legibility. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 1191–1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.231

    OpenUrl
30. 1. Lange, E.

    (2001). The limits of realism: Perceptions of virtual landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54(1–4), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00134-7

    OpenUrlCrossRef
31. 1. Lange, E., &
    2. Schmid, W. A.

    (2000). Ecological planning with virtual landscapes: Three examples from Switzerland. Landscape Journal, 19(1–2), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.19.1-2.156

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
32. 1. Leach, N.

    (2002). Designing for a digital world. Academy Editions.
33. 1. Lombardo, A. E.

    (2018). Virtual reality and the landscape architecture design process (Master‘s thesis), Norwegian University of Life Sciences.
34. 1. Lyle, J. T.

    (1985). The alternating current of design process. Landscape Journal, 4(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.4.1.7

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
35. 1. Makstutis, G.

    (2010). Architecture: An introduction. Portfolio. Laurence King.
36. 1. Milburn, L. A. S., &
    2. Brown, R. D.

    (2003). The relationship between research and design in landscape architecture. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64(1–2), 47–66.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
37. 1. Milgram, P., &
    2. Kishino, F.

    (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems, 77(12), 1321–1329.

    OpenUrl
38. 1. Mitchell, W. J.

    (1975). The theoretical foundation of computer-aided architectural design. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2(2), 127–150.

    OpenUrl
39. 1. Oprean, D.,
    2. Verniz, D.,
    3. Zhao, J.,
    4. Wallgrün, J. O.,
    5. Duarte, J. P., &
    6. Klippel, A.

    (2018). Remote studio site experiences: Investigating the potential to develop the immersive site visit. In Fukuda T., Huang W., Janssen P., Crolla K., &Alhadidi S. (Eds.), Learning, adapting and prototyping—Proceedings of the 23rd CAADRIA Conference (pp. 421–430). Tsinghua University.
40. 1. Orland, B.,
    2. Budthimedhee, K., &
    3. Uusitalo, J.

    (2001). Considering virtual worlds as representations of landscape realities and as tools for landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54(1–4), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00132-3

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
41. 1. Parke, F. I.

    (2005). Lower cost spatially immersive visualization for human environments. Landscape and Urban Planning, 73 (2–3), 234–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.11.009

    OpenUrl
42. 1. Portman, M. E.,
    2. Natapov, A., &
    3. Fisher–Gewirtzman, D.

    (2015). To go where no man has gone before: Virtual reality in architecture, landscape architecture and environmental planning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 54, 376–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.05.001

    OpenUrl
43. 1. Pressman, A.

    (2012). Designing architecture: The elements of process. Routledge.
44. 1. Relph, E.

    (1976). Place and placelessness: Research in planning and design (vol. 1). Pion.
45. 1. Schutte, N. S., &
    2. Stilinović, E. J.

    (2017) Facilitating empathy through virtual reality. Motivation & Emotion, 41, 708–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031–017–9641–7

    OpenUrl
46. 1. Shin, D.

    (2018). Empathy and embodied experience in virtual environment: To what extent can virtual reality stimulate empathy and embodied experience? Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.012

    OpenUrl
47. 1. Slater, M.,
    2. Usoh, M., &
    3. Steed, A.

    (1995). Taking steps: the influence of a walking technique on presence in virtual reality. ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction (TOCHI), 2(3), 201–219.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
48. 1. Suh, A., &
    2. Prophet, J.

    (2018). The state of immersive technology research: A literature analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.019

    OpenUrl
49. 1. Williams, D. R.

    (2014). Making sense of “place”: Reflections on pluralism and positionality in place research. Landscape and Urban Planning, 131, 74–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.002

    OpenUrlCrossRef
50. 1. Wu, H., &
    2. Leung, S. O.

    (2017). Can Likert scales be treated as interval scales? A simulation study. Journal of Social Service Research, 43(4), 527–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2017.1329775

    OpenUrl
51. 1. Yin, R. K.

    (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage.