Recent Trends in LA-Based Research: A Topic Analysis of CELA Abstract Content

REFERENCES

1. ↵
   1. Blei, D.,
   2. Carin, L., &
   3. Dunson, D.

   (2010). Probabilistic topic models. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 27(6), 55–65.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Blei, D. M., &
   2. Lafferty, J. D.

   (2006). Dynamic topic models. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on machine learning.
3. ↵
   1. Blei, D. M.,
   2. Ng, A. Y., &
   3. Jordan, M. I.

   (2003). Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993–1022.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. ↵
   1. Bruns, D.,
   2. van den Brink, A.,
   3. Tobi, H., &
   4. Bell, S.

   (2016). Advancing landscape architecture research. In van den Brink, A., Bruns, D., Tobi, H. & Bell S. (Eds.), Research in landscape architecture: Methods and methodology (pp. 11–23). Routledge.
5. ↵
   1. Cushing, D. F., &
   2. Renata, A.

   (2015). Themes in landscape architecture publishing: Past trends, future needs. Landscape Journal, 34(1), 15–36.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
6. ↵
   1. Das, S.,
   2. Sun, X., &
   3. Dutta, A.

   (2016). Text mining and topic modeling of compendiums of papers from transportation research board annual meetings. Transportation Research Record, 2552(1), 48–56.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Deming, M. E., &
   2. Swaffield, S.

   (2011). Knowing landscape architecture. In Deming M.E. & Swaffield, S. Landscape architectural research: Inquiry, strategy, design (pp. 17–29). John Wiley & Sons.
8. ↵
   1. Edison, H., &
   2. Carcel, H.

   (2020). Text data analysis using latent Dirichlet allocation: An application to FOMC transcripts. Applied Economics Letters, 1–5.
9. Executive Committee of the Council of Educators in Landscape Architecture (CELA). (1976). Task Force on Future Directions: Options and potentials for the CELA. Draft Report, July 16.
10. ↵
    1. Fein, A.

    (1972). A study of the profession of landscape architecture: Technical report. American Society of Landscape Architects Foundation.
11. ↵
    1. Francis, M.

    (2016). The making of democratic streets. Contesti. Città, territori, progetti (1–2), 192–213.
12. ↵
    1. Gobster, P. H.,
    2. Nassauer, J. I., &
    3. Nadenicek, D. J.

    (2010). Landscape journal and scholarship in landscape architecture the next 25 years. Landscape Journal, 29(1), 52–70.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
13. ↵
    1. Hester, R. T.

    (2006). Design for ecological democracy. MIT Press.
14. ↵
    1. Hodges, M. R., &
    2. Rutz, M. E.

    (1997). An historical summary of the council of educators in landscape architecture. Landscape Journal, 16(1), 108–114.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
15. ↵
    1. Langley, W. N.,
    2. Corry, R. C., &
    3. Brown, R. D.

    (2018). Core knowledge domains of landscape architecture. Landscape Journal, 37(1), 9–21.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
16. ↵
    1. Linn, K.

    (2007). Building commons and community. New Village Press.
17. ↵
    1. Meijering, J. V.,
    2. Tobi, H.,
    3. van den Brink, A.,
    4. Morris, F., &
    5. Bruns, D.

    (2015). Exploring research priorities in landscape architecture: An international Delphi study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 137, 85–94.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Milburn, L. A. S., &
    2. Brown, R. D.

    (2016). Research productivity and utilization in landscape architecture. Landscape and Urban Planning, 147(1), 71–77.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Mo, Y.,
    2. Kontonatsios, G., &
    3. Ananiadou, S.

    (2015). Supporting systematic reviews using LDA-based document representations. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 172.

    OpenUrl
20. 1. Newman, G.,
    2. George, B.,
    3. Li., D.,
    4. Tao, Z.,
    5. Yu. S.,
    6. Lee, R. J.

    (2018). Online learning in landscape architecture: Assessing issues, preferences, and student needs in design-related online education. Landscape Journal, 37(2), 41–63.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
21. ↵
    1. Newman, G.
    2. Kim, J. H.,
    3. Lee, R. J.,
    4. Brown, B., &
    5. Huston, S.

    (2016). The perceived effects of flipped teaching on knowledge acquisition. Journal of Effective Teaching, 16(1), 52–71.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Newman, G.,
    2. Ozdil, T., &
    3. Li, D.

    (2018). Engaged scholarship: The 2019 Council of Educators in Landscape Architecture Conference [Conference Review]. Landscape Journal, 37(2), 133–136.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
23. ↵
    1. Nijhuis, S., &
    2. Bobbink, I.

    (2012). Design-related research in landscape architecture. Journal of Design Research, 10(4), 239–257.

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Nijhuis, S., &
    2. de Vries, J.

    (2019). Design as research in landscape architecture. Landscape Journal, 38(1-2), 87–103.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
25. ↵
    1. Powers, M. N., &
    2. Walker, J. B.

    (2009). Twenty-five years of Landscape Journal: An analysis of authorship and article content. Landscape Journal, 28(1), 96–110.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
26. ↵
    1. Sun, L., &
    2. Yin, Y.

    (2017). Discovering themes and trends in transportation research using topic modeling. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 77, 49–66.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Tufte, E. R.

    (2001). The visual display of quantitative information (vol. 2). Graphics Press.
28. ↵
    1. Vicenzotti, V.,
    2. Jorgensen, A.,
    3. Qviström, M., &
    4. Swaffield, S.

    (2016). Forty years of landscape research. Landscape Research, 41(4), 388–407.

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Wei, X., &
    2. Croft, W. B.

    (2006,). LDA-based document models for ad-hoc retrieval. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 178–185). ACM.