Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • ASLA Research Grant
  • Other Publications
    • UWP

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Landscape Journal
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Landscape Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • ASLA Research Grant
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research Article

Mystery in an Information Processing Model of Landscape Preference

H. Randy Gimblett, Robert M. Itami and John E. Fitzgibbon
Landscape Journal, September 1985, 4 (2) 87-95; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.4.2.87
H. Randy Gimblett
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert M. Itami
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John E. Fitzgibbon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The one model that easily lends itself to application in the evaluation of scenic resources in Ontario is the Kaplans' Informational Model of Landscape Preference, published in 1982. In this model, Kaplan and Kaplan proposed a cognitive theory of landscape preference that contained the dimensions of mystery, complexity, coherence, and legibility. Work by Brown and Itami published in the same year used this theory as the basis for assessing scenic quality in rural landscapes. Preference research by Herbert in 1981 has validated the theoretical basis for the scenic assessment framework proposed by Brown and Itami; however, one component of the model, namely mystery, has not been suitably incorporated. This study looks at the validation of a refined definition of mystery to see whether observers perceive this dimension as an independent attribute of landscape scenery, and examines the physical factors which contribute to this perception. Over 200 black and white photographs of rural landscape scenery were presented to 36 observers who rated each photograph on a five point scale for the degree of mystery according to the Kaplans' definition. The data were analyzed using Multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) to determine the amount of agreement among observers as to the perception of mystery and to identify physical landscape attributes that contribute to this perception. Results from the MDS revealed high agreement among observers as to the perception of mystery. Analysis of the composition of the photographs identified five physical landscape attributes consistently associated with differences in mystery ratings.

  • © 1985 by the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Landscape Journal
Vol. 4, Issue 2
21 Sep 1985
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Landscape Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Mystery in an Information Processing Model of Landscape Preference
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Landscape Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Landscape Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Mystery in an Information Processing Model of Landscape Preference
H. Randy Gimblett, Robert M. Itami, John E. Fitzgibbon
Landscape Journal Sep 1985, 4 (2) 87-95; DOI: 10.3368/lj.4.2.87

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Mystery in an Information Processing Model of Landscape Preference
H. Randy Gimblett, Robert M. Itami, John E. Fitzgibbon
Landscape Journal Sep 1985, 4 (2) 87-95; DOI: 10.3368/lj.4.2.87
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Examining the Visual Effects of Plant Foliation and Vegetative Winter Dormancy on Preference and Mystery
  • Here and Gone: The Visual Effects of Seasonal Changes in Plant and Vegetative Characteristics on Landscape Preference Criteria
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

UWP

© 2023 Landscape Journal

Powered by HighWire