Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • ASLA Research Grant
  • Other Publications
    • UW Press Journals
    • Ecological Restoration
    • Land Economics
    • Native Plants Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Landscape Journal
  • Other Publications
    • UW Press Journals
    • Ecological Restoration
    • Land Economics
    • Native Plants Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Landscape Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • ASLA Research Grant
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticlePeer-Reviewed Articles

Homelessness in the Public Landscape: A Typology of Informal Infrastructure

Cory Parker
Landscape Journal, January 2021, 40 (1) 49-66; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.40.1.49
Cory Parker
Cory Parker researches homeless communities of West Coast cities while instructing students in landscape architecture at the University of California, Davis. He is a 2019–2020 Faculty Fellow of Design for Spatial Justice at the University of Oregon. He completed a PhD in Geography at UC Davis with a dissertation on homeless mobility. Prior to that, he practiced landscape architecture in Seattle for 18 years.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Abt Associates
    . (2020). The 2019 annual homeless assessment report (AHAR) to Congress. US Department of Housing and Urban Development.
  2. ↵
    1. Amster, R.
    (2003). Patterns of exclusion: Sanitizing space, criminalizing homelessness. Social Justice, 30(1(91)), 195–221.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Amster, R.
    (2004). Street people and the contested realms of public space. Scholarly Pub.
  4. ↵
    1. Appleton, J.
    (1975). Experience of landscape. John Wiley & Sons.
  5. ↵
    1. Applied Survey Research
    . (2017). Alameda County homeless census and survey. http://www.EveryOneHome.org
  6. ↵
    1. Applied Survey Research
    . (2019a). City of Oakland homeless count and survey comprehensive report 2019. Alameda County.
  7. ↵
    1. Applied Survey Research
    . (2019b). Santa Cruz County homeless census and survey comprehensive report 2019) [Point in Time Count]. Santa Cruz County. https://housingmatterssc.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/2019-PIT-Count-Full-Report.pdf
  8. ↵
    1. Bauman, T.
    (2019). Housing not handcuffs 2019: Ending the criminalization of homelessness in U.S. cities. National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty.
  9. ↵
    1. Bergamaschi, M.,
    2. Castrignanò, M., &
    3. Rubertis, P. D.
    (2014). The homeless and public space: Urban policy and exclusion in Bologna. Revue Interventions Économiques. Papers in Political Economy, 51. http://interventionseconomiques.revues.org/2441
  10. ↵
    1. Blomley, N.
    (2009). Homelessness, Rights, and the delusions of property. Urban Geography, 30(6), 577–590. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.30.6.577
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    1. Bourdieu, P.
    (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press.
  12. ↵
    1. Brinegar, S. J.
    (2003). The social construction of homeless shelters in the Phoenix area. Urban Geography, 24(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.24.1.61
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    1. Buccieri, K.
    (2014). Agency bound: Mapping the temporal-spatial relationship between homeless individuals and the social service sector. In L. McLean, L. Stafford, & M. Weeds (Eds.), Exploring bodies in time and space (pp. 125–135). Inter-Disciplinary Press.
  14. ↵
    1. Caldeira, T. P. R.
    (2009). Marginality, again?! International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(3), 848–853. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00923.x
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Casey, R.,
    2. Goudie, R., &
    3. Reeve, K.
    (2008). Homeless women in public spaces: Strategies of resistance. Housing Studies, 23(6), 899–916. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030802416627
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. ↵
    1. Certeau, M. de.
    (2002). The practice of everyday life, 2nd ed., trans. S. Rendall. University of California Press.
  17. ↵
    1. Cresswell, T.
    (1996). In place/out of place: Geography, ideology, and transgression. University of Minnesota Press.
  18. ↵
    1. Cronon, W.
    (1992). Nature’s metropolis: Chicago and the great West (rev. ed.). W. W. Norton.
  19. ↵
    1. Dales, R.,
    2. Wheeler, A.,
    3. Mahmud, M.,
    4. Frescura, A. M.,
    5. Smith-Doiron, M.,
    6. Nethery, E., &
    7. Liu, L.
    (2008). The influence of living near roadways on spirometry and exhaled nitric oxide in elementary schoolchildren. Environmental Health Perspectives, 116(10), 1423–1427.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    1. Dear, M., &
    2. Gleeson, B.
    (1991). Community attitudes toward the homeless. Urban Geography, 12(2), 155–176. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.12.2.155
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    1. Dear, M. J., &
    2. Wolch, J. R.
    (1992). Landscapes of despair: From deinstitutionalization to homelessness. Princeton University Press.
  22. ↵
    1. Duncan, J.
    (1978) Men without property: The tramp’s classification and use of urban space. Antipode, 10(1), 24–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. ↵
    1. Ellsworth, J. T.
    (2018). Street crime victimization among homeless adults: A review of the literature. Victims & Offenders, 14(1), 96–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2018.1547997
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Gandy, M.
    (2016). Unintentional landscapes. Landscape Research, 41(4), 433–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2016.1156069
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Garvin, E.,
    2. Branas, C.,
    3. Keddem, S.,
    4. Sellman, J., &
    5. Cannuscio, C.
    (2012). More than just an eyesore: Local insights and solutions on vacant land and urban health. Journal of Urban Health, 90(3), 412–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-012-9782-7
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. Gendron, R., &
    2. Domhoff, G. W.
    (2009). The leftmost city: Power and progressive politics in Santa Cruz. ReadHowYouWant.com.
  27. ↵
    1. Gibson, K. E.
    (2011). Street kids: Homeless youth, outreach, and policing New York’s streets. NYU Press.
  28. ↵
    1. Gregory, D.
    (1995). Imaginative geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 19(4), 447–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913259501900402
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    1. Han, S.
    (2021). The use of transects for resilient design: Core theories and contemporary projects. Landscape Ecology (forthcoming). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01172-9
  30. ↵
    1. Hardin, J., &
    2. Wille, D. E.
    (2017). The homeless individual’s viewpoint: Causes of homelessness and resources needed to leave the sheltered environment. Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 19(2), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v19i2.1059
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Harrell, K.
    (2019). Homelessness in Portland, Oregon: An analysis of homeless campsite spatial patterns and spatial relationships. Geography Masters Research Papers. https://doi.org/10.15760/geogmaster.24
  32. ↵
    1. Harter, L. M.,
    2. Berquist, C.,
    3. Titsworth, S.,
    4. Novak, D., &
    5. Brokaw, T.
    (2005). The structuring of invisibility among the hidden homeless: The politics of space, stigma, and identity construction. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 33(4), 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880500278079
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    1. Herbert, S., &
    2. Beckett, K.
    (2010). “This is home for us”: Questioning banishment from the ground up. Social & Cultural Geography, 11(3), 231–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649361003637661
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. ↵
    1. Herring, C.
    (2014). The new logics of homeless seclusion: Homeless encampments in America’s West Coast cities. City & Community, 13(4), 285–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/cico.12086
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Herring, C., &
    2. Lutz, M.
    (2015). The roots and implications of the USA’s homeless tent cities. City, 19(5), 689–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2015.1071114
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. ↵
    1. Hodgetts, D.,
    2. Stolte, O.,
    3. Chamberlain, K.,
    4. Radley, A.,
    5. Nikora, L.,
    6. Nabalarua, E., &
    7. Groot, S.
    (2008). A trip to the library: Homelessness and social inclusion. Social & Cultural Geography, 9(8), 933–953. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360802441432
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Jacobs, J.
    (1992). The death and life of Great American cities. Vintage.
  38. ↵
    1. Jain, S. S. L.
    (2004). “Dangerous instrumentality”: The bystander as subject in automobility. Cultural Anthropology, 19(1), 61–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. ↵
    1. Jennings, J.
    (2007). A case for a typology of design: The Interior Archetype Project. Journal of Interior Design, 32(3), 48–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1668.2007.tb00540.x
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    1. Jocoy, C. L.
    (2013). Counting the homeless: The culture of quantification in American social policy. Cultural Geographies, 20(3), 397–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474012454999
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  41. ↵
    1. Kaplan, A.,
    2. Diver, K.,
    3. Sandin, K., &
    4. Mill, S. K.
    (2019). Homeless interactions with the built environment: A spatial pattern language of abandoned housing. Urban Science, 3(2), 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci3020065
    OpenUrl
  42. ↵
    1. Kelbaugh, D.
    (1996). Typology—An architecture of limits. Architectural Theory Review, 1(2), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/13264829609478288
    OpenUrl
  43. ↵
    1. Klodawsky, F.
    (2009). Home spaces and rights to the city: Thinking social justice for chronically homeless women. Urban Geography, 30(6), 591–610. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.30.6.591
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  44. ↵
    1. Larkin, B.
    (2013). The politics and poetics of infrastructure. Annual Review of Anthropology, 42(1), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155522
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  45. ↵
    1. Lee, B. A., &
    2. Schreck, C. J.
    (2005). Danger on the streets: Marginality and victimization among people who are homeless. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(8), 1055–1081. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764204274200
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  46. ↵
    1. Lubell, S.
    (2019, November 18). Walter Hood digs deep. Architectural Digest. https://www.architecturaldigest.com/story/walter-hood-digs-deep
  47. ↵
    1. Maharidge, D., &
    2. Williamson, M.
    (1993). The last great American hobo. Prima.
  48. ↵
    1. McShane, C.
    (1994). Down the asphalt path: The automobile and the American city. Columbia University Press.
  49. ↵
    1. Mehta, V.
    (2009). Look closely and you will see, listen carefully and you will hear: Urban design and social interaction on streets. Journal of Urban Design, 14(1), 29–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800802452658
    OpenUrl
  50. ↵
    1. Mitchell, D.
    (1997). The annihilation of space by law: The roots and implications of anti-homeless laws in the United States. Antipode, 29(3), 303–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00048
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  51. ↵
    1. Mitchell, D.
    (2003). The right to the city: Social justice and the fight for public space. Guilford Press.
  52. ↵
    1. Murphy, S.
    (2009). “Compassionate” strategies of managing homelessness: Post-revanchist geographies in San Francisco. Antipode, 41(2), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00674.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  53. ↵
    1. Nello-Deakin, S.
    (2019). Is there such a thing as a “fair” distribution of road space? Journal of Urban Design, 24(5), 698–714. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2019.1592664
    OpenUrl
  54. ↵
    1. Norton, P. D.
    (2007). Street rivals: Jaywalking and the invention of the motor age street. Technology and Culture, 48(2), 331–359. https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2007.0085
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  55. ↵
    1. Parker, C.
    (2020). Tent city: Patterns of informality and the partitioning of Sacramento. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 44(2), 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12846
    OpenUrl
  56. ↵
    1. Patton, J. W.
    (2004). Multiple worlds on Oakland’s streets social practice and the built environment. Visual Anthropology Review, 20(2), 36–56. https://doi.org/10.1525/var.2004.20.2.36
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  57. ↵
    1. Perlman, J. E.
    (1975). Rio’s favelas and the myth of marginality. Politics & Society, 5(2), 131–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/003232927500500201
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Rancière, J.
    (2015). Dissensus: On politics and aesthetics (trans. S. Corcoran). Bloomsbury Academic.
  58. ↵
    1. Rollinson, P. A.
    (1998). The everyday geography of the homeless in Kansas City. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 80(2), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.1998.00032.x
    OpenUrl
  59. ↵
    1. Ruddick, S. M.
    (1996). Young and homeless in Hollywood: Mapping the social imaginary. Routledge.
  60. ↵
    1. Sacramento Steps Forward
    . (2019, June 26). Sacramento county point in time (PIT) homeless count shows 19% rise in homelessness. Sacramento Steps Forward.Org. https://sacramentostepsforward.org/2019pitcount/
  61. ↵
    1. Schein, R. H.
    (2009). Belonging through land/scape. Environment and Planning A, 41(4), 811–826. https://doi.org/10.1068/a41125
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  62. ↵
    1. Snow, D. A., &
    2. Mulcahy, M.
    (2001). Space, politics, and the survival strategies of the homeless. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(1), 149–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027640121956962
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  63. ↵
    1. Soja, E. W.
    (2011). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory (2nd ed.). Verso.
  64. ↵
    1. Sparks, T.
    (2017a). Citizens without property: Informality and political agency in a Seattle, Washington homeless encampment. Environment and Planning A, 49(1), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16665360
    OpenUrl
  65. ↵
    1. Sparks, T.
    (2017b). Neutralizing homelessness, 2015: Tent cities and ten year plans. Urban Geography, 38(3), 348–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1247600
    OpenUrl
  66. ↵
    1. Stuart, F.
    (2014). From “rabble management” to “recovery management”: Policing homelessness in marginal urban space. Urban Studies, 51(9), 1909–1925. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013499798
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  67. ↵
    1. Takahashi, L. M.
    (1997). The socio-spatial stigmatization of homelessness and HIV/AIDS: Toward an explanation of the NIMBY syndrome. Social Science & Medicine, 45(6), 903–914.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. ↵
    1. Walby, K., &
    2. Lippert, R.
    (2012). Spatial regulation, dispersal, and the aesthetics of the city: Conservation officer policing of homeless people in Ottawa, Canada. Antipode, 44(3), 1015–1033. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00923.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  69. ↵
    1. Watkins, J.
    (2015). Spatial imaginaries research in geography: Synergies, tensions, and new directions. Geography Compass, 9(9), 508–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12228
    OpenUrl
  70. ↵
    1. Wolch, J. R.,
    2. Rahimian, A., &
    3. Koegel, P.
    (1993). Daily and periodic mobility patterns of the urban homeless. Professional Geographer, 45(2), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1993.00159.x
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  71. ↵
    1. Wolch, J. R., &
    2. Rowe, S.
    (1992). On the streets: Mobility paths of the urban homeless. City & Society, 6(2), 115–140. https://doi.org/10.1525/city.1992.6.2.115
    OpenUrl
  72. ↵
    1. Wright, T.
    (1997). Out of place: Homeless mobilizations, subcities, and contested landscapes. State University of New York Press.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Landscape Journal: 40 (1)
Landscape Journal
Vol. 40, Issue 1
1 Jan 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Landscape Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Homelessness in the Public Landscape: A Typology of Informal Infrastructure
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Landscape Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Landscape Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Homelessness in the Public Landscape: A Typology of Informal Infrastructure
Cory Parker
Landscape Journal Jan 2021, 40 (1) 49-66; DOI: 10.3368/lj.40.1.49

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Homelessness in the Public Landscape: A Typology of Informal Infrastructure
Cory Parker
Landscape Journal Jan 2021, 40 (1) 49-66; DOI: 10.3368/lj.40.1.49
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK: LANDSCAPES OF HOMELESSNESS
    • SETTING AND METHODS
    • A TYPOLOGY OF LANDSCAPES OF HOMELESSNESS
    • DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF LANDSCAPE TYPES
    • CONCLUSION
    • HUMAN SUBJECT RESEARCH
    • PEER REVIEW STATEMENT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A Survey of Resources for Teaching Nature‐Based Solutions in Landscape Architecture Curricula
  • Use Value, Not Exchange Value
  • Visualizing ASLA Conference Education Session Content, 2011, 2013–2023
Show more Peer-Reviewed Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Homelessness
  • urban landscape
  • transportation
  • transect
  • spatial imaginary
  • encampment
UW Press logo

© 2026 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire