The Impact of Virtual Reality on Student Design Decisions

REFERENCES

1. ↵
   1. Atwa, S. M. H.,
   2. Ibrahim, M. G.,
   3. Saleh, A. M., &
   4. Murata, R.

   (2019). Development of sustainable landscape design guidelines for a green business park using virtual reality. Sustainable Cities and Society, 48, 1–13.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Bishop, I.

   (2011). Landscape planning is not a game: Should it be? Landscape and Urban Planning, 100, 390–392.

   OpenUrl
3. 1. Brown, P.

   (2009). CAD: Do computers aid the design process after all?. Intersect: The Stanford Journal of Science, Technology, and Society, 2(1), 52–66.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Bruce, V.,
   2. Green, P. R., &
   3. Georgeson, M. A.

   (1996). Visual perception: Physiology, psychology, & ecology. Psychology Press.
5. ↵
   1. Castronovo, F.,
   2. Nikolic, D.,
   3. Liu, Y., &
   4. Messner, J.

   (2013, October 30–31). An evaluation of virtual reality systems for design reviews [Conference presentation]. International Conference on Construction Applications of Virtual Reality, London, UK, 22–29.
6. ↵
   1. Chamberlain, B.

   (2015). Crash course or course crash: Gaming, VR and a pedagogical approach. In E. Buhmann, S. M. Ervin, & M. Pietsch, M. (Eds.), Proceedings of digital landscape architecture 2015 at Anhalt University of Applied Sciences (pp. 354–361). Wichmann.
7. ↵
   1. Dunston, P. S.,
   2. Arns L. L.,
   3. Mcglothlin J. D.,
   4. Lasker G. C., &
   5. Kushner, A. G.

   (2011). An immersive virtual reality mock-up for design review of hospital patient rooms. Collaborative design in virtual environments. intelligent systems, control and automation: Science and engineering, 48, (pp. 167–176). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0605-7_15

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Engström, J.,
   2. Markkula, G.,
   3. Victor, T., &
   4. Merat, N.

   (2017). Effects of cognitive load on driving performance: The cognitive control hypothesis. Human Factors, 59(5), 734–764.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Freitas, M., &
   2. Ruschel, R.

   (2013, May 15–18). What is happening to virtual and augmented reality applied to architecture? Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA 2013), Singapore, 407–416.
10. ↵
    1. Freitas, M., &
    2. Ruschel, R.

    (2015). Validation of commercial AR toolkits to support post-occupation evaluation of the built environment. Ambient Construction, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-86212015000200016
11. ↵
    1. George, B. H.

    (2016). Distributed site analysis utilizing drones and 360 degree video. Journal of Digital Landscape Architecture, 1, 92–99.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. George, B. H.,
    2. Sleipness, O., &
    3. Quebbeman, A.

    (2017). Using virtual reality as a design input: Impacts on collaboration in a university design studio setting. Journal of Digital Landscape Architecture, 2, 252–259.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Gersmehl, P. J., &
    2. Gersmehl, C. A.

    (2007). Spatial thinking by young children: Neurologic evidence for early development and “educability.” Journal of Geography, 106(5), 181–191.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Grau, O.

    (2003). Virtual art: From illusion to immersion. The MIT Press.
15. ↵
    1. Hansen, A., &
    2. Machin, D.

    (2013). Researching visual environmental communication. Environmental Communication, 7(2), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2013.785441

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Hill, D.,
    2. George, B. H., &
    3. Evans, D.

    (2019). How virtual reality impacts the landscape architecture design process at the site-scale during the phases of analysis and concept development. Landscape Research Record, 8, 48–60.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Hill, D.,
    2. George, B. H., &
    3. Johnson, T.

    (2019). How virtual reality impacts the landscape architecture design process during the phases of analysis and concept development at the master planning scale. Journal of Digital Landscape Architecture, 4, 266–274. doi:doi:10.14627/537663029

    OpenUrlCrossRef
18. ↵
    1. Horne, M., &
    2. Thompson, E.

    (2008). The role of virtual reality in built environment education. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 3(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.11120/jebe.2008.03010005

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Li, Z.,
    2. Cheng, Y., &
    3. Yuan, Y.

    (2017). Research on the application of virtual reality technology in landscape design teaching. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18(5), 1400–1410.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Literat, I.

    (2013). A pencil for your thoughts: Participatory drawing as a visual research method with children and youth. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12(1), 84–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691301200143

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Portman, M.,
    2. Natapov, A.,
    3. Fisher-Gewirtzman, D.

    (2015). To go where no man has gone before: Virtual reality in architecture, landscape architecture and environmental planning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 54, 376–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.05.001

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Qi, X.,
    2. Lo, T. T., &
    3. Han, Y.

    (2021). Designing for human-VR interaction-How VR interaction can be designed to bring better design participation. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference of the Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA), 2, 163–172.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Rahimian, F., &
    2. Ibrahim, R.

    (2011). Impacts of VR 3D sketching on novice designers’ spatial cognition in collaborative conceptual architectural design. Design Studies, 32(3), 255–291.

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Rose, G.

    (2012). Visual methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials. Sage.
25. 1. S¸ahbaz, E.

    (2020). VR-based interactive learning in architectural education: A case on Safranbolu Historical Bathhouse. International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 8, 342–356.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Salman, H. S.,
    2. Laing, R., &
    3. Conniff, A.

    (2014). The impact of computer aided architectural design programs on conceptual design in an educational context. Design Studies, 35(4), 412–439.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
27. ↵
    1. Sanchez, G. M. E.,
    2. Renterghem, T. V.,
    3. Sun, K.,
    4. De Coensel, B., &
    5. Botteldooren, D.

    (2017). Using virtual reality for assessing the role of noise in the audio-visual design of an urban public space. Landscape and Urban Planning, 99–107.
28. ↵
    1. Sun, G., &
    2. Yao, S.

    (2012, September). Investigating the relation between cognitive load and creativity in the conceptual design process. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 56(1), 308–312. Sage.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
29. ↵
    1. Tufte, E.

    (1990). Envisioning information. Graphics Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/027046769301300113
30. ↵
    1. Valiela, I.

    (2009). Doing science: Design, analysis and communication of scientific research. Oxford University Press.
31. ↵
    1. Wang, P.,
    2. Wu, P.,
    3. Wang, J.,
    4. Chi, H. L., &
    5. Wang, X.

    (2018). A critical review of the use of virtual reality in construction engineering education and training. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(6), 1204.

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    1. Ware, C.

    (2013). Information visualization: Perception for design. Elsevier.
33. ↵
    1. Wojtczuk, A., &
    2. Bonnardel, N.

    (2011). Designing and assessing everyday objects: Impact of externalisation tools and judges’ backgrounds. Interacting with Computers, 23(4), 337–345.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
34. ↵
    1. Young, L., &
    2. Barrett, H.

    (2001). Adapting visual methods: Action research with Kampala street children. Area, 33(2), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4762.00017

    OpenUrlCrossRef