Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • ASLA Research Grant
  • Other Publications
    • UWP

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Landscape Journal
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Landscape Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • ASLA Research Grant
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
Research ArticlePeer-Reviewed Articles

Climate BufferNet: A Gaming Simulation Linking Biodiversity Conservation and Climate Change Adaptation with Agricultural Landscape Planning

Aaron William Thompson, Robert Marzec and Gary Burniske
Landscape Journal, January 2022, 41 (1) 45-60; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.41.1.45
Aaron William Thompson
Aaron W. Thompson, PhD, is an assistant professor of horticulture and landscape architecture and director of the Center for Community & Environmental Design at Purdue University.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Marzec
Robert Marzec, PhD, is a professor of English in the College of Liberal Arts at Purdue University.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gary Burniske
Gary Burniske is an assistant director with the International Programs in Agriculture for the College of Agriculture at Purdue University.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

    1. Almond, R. E. A.,
    2. Grooten M., and
    3. Petersen, T.
    (2020). Living planet report 2020—Bending the curve of biodiversity loss. World Wildlife Fund.
    1. Arbuckle, J. G. , Jr.,
    2. Hobbs, J.,
    3. Loy, A.,
    4. Morton, L. W.,
    5. Prokopy, L., &
    6. Tyndall, J.
    (2014). Understanding farmer perspectives on climate change: Toward effective communication strategies for adaptation and mitigation in the Corn Belt. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 69(6), 505–516.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Arbuckle, J. G. , Jr.,
    2. Morton, L. W., &
    3. Hobbs, J.
    (2015). Trust, beliefs, and perceived risk as determinants of farmer support for adaptive and mitigative responses to climate change. Environment and Behavior, 47(2), 205–234.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Blumberg, F. C.,
    2. Almonte, D. E.,
    3. Anthony, J. S., &
    4. Hashimoto, N.
    (2013). Serious Games: What are they? What do they do? Why should we play them? In K. Dill (Ed.), Oxford handbook of media psychology (pp. 334–351). Oxford University Press.
    1. Bowling, L. C.,
    2. Widhalm, M.,
    3. Cherkauer, K. A.,
    4. Beckerman, J.,
    5. Brouder, S.,
    6. Buzan, J.,
    7. Doering, O.,
    8. Dukes, J.,
    9. Ebner, P.,
    10. Frankenburger, J.,
    11. Gramig, B.,
    12. Kladivko, E. J.,
    13. Lee, C.,
    14. Volenec, J., &
    15. Weil, C.
    (2018). Indiana’s agriculture in a changing climate: A report from the Indiana climate change impacts assessment. Agriculture Reports Paper 1. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284316778
    1. Brondizio, E. S.,
    2. Settele, J.,
    3. Díaz, S., &
    4. Ngo, H. T.
    (2019). Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2616458
    1. Burkhard, B., de Groot, R. Costanza, R., Seppelt, R.,
    2. Jørgensen, S. E., &
    3. Potschin, M.
    (2012). Solutions for sustaining natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators, 21, 1–6.
    OpenUrl
    1. Chan, K. M. A., &
    2. Satterfield, T.
    (2016). Managing cultural ecosystem services for sustainability. In M. Potschin, R. Haines-Young, R. Fish, & R. K. Turner (Eds.), Routledge handbook of ecosystem services (pp. 343–358). Routledge.
    1. Chandler, K. R.,
    2. Stevens, C. J.,
    3. Binley, A., &
    4. Keith, A. M.
    (2018). Influence of tree species and forest land use on soil hydraulic conductivity and implications for surface runoff generation. Geoderma, 310, 120–127.
    OpenUrl
  1. CSP [Conservation Science Partners]. (2019). Methods and approach used to estimate the loss and fragmentation of natural lands in the conterminous U.S. from 2001 to 2017. Technical Report. Truckee, CA.
    1. Dahl, T. E.
    (1990). Wetlands losses in the United States from the 1780s to 1980s. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service.
    1. Eastburn, D. J.,
    2. O’Geen, A. T.,
    3. Tate, K. W., &
    4. Roche, L. M.
    (2017). Multiple ecosystem services in a working landscape. PloS ONE 12, e0166595.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. EPA [Environmental Protection Agency]. (2019). Environmental modeling community of practice. www.epa.gov/ceam
    1. Fagerholm, N., &
    2. Palomo, I.
    (2017). Participatory GIS approaches for mapping ecosystem services. In B. Burkhard, & J. Maes (Eds.), Mapping ecosystem services (pp. 218–222). Pensoft Publishers.
  3. FAO [Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations] (2019). The state of food and agriculture 2019. Moving forward on food loss and waste reduction. https://doi.org/10.4060/CA6030EN
    1. Fry, L. E.,
    2. Savage, J.,
    3. Hall, A. L.,
    4. Oakley, S.,
    5. Pritchard, W. J.,
    6. Ostle, N. J.,
    7. Pywell, R. F.,
    8. Bullock J. M., &
    9. R. D. Bardgett
    , R. D. (2018). Soil multifunctionality and drought resistance are determined by plant structural traits in restoring grassland. Ecology, 99(10), 2260–2271.
    OpenUrl
  4. Google (2019). Google sustainability. https://sustainability.google/tools/
    1. Grese, R. E.
    (1992). Jens Jensen: Maker of natural parks and gardens. Johns Hopkins University Press.
    1. Gu, Y.,
    2. Deal, B., &
    3. Larsen, L.
    (2018). Geodesign processes and ecological systems thinking in a coupled humanenvironment context: An integrated framework for landscape architecture. Sustainability, 10(9), 3306. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093306
    OpenUrl
    1. Haigh, T.,
    2. Takle, E.,
    3. Andresen, J.,
    4. Widhalm, M.,
    5. Carlton, J. S., &
    6. Angel, J.
    (2015). Mapping the decision points and climate information use of agricultural producers across the U.S. Corn Belt. Climate Risk Management, 7, 2030.
    OpenUrl
    1. Hannah, L.,
    2. Carr, J. L., &
    3. Lankerani, A.
    (1995). Human disturbance and natural habitat: A biome level analysis of a global set. Biodiversity and Conservation, 4, 128–155.
    OpenUrl
    1. Haris, A. A.,
    2. Chhabra, V., &
    3. Biswas, S.
    (2013). Carbon sequestration for mitigation of climate change—A review. Agricultural reviews, 34(2): 129–136.
    OpenUrl
    1. Harwood, A. R.,
    2. Lovett, A. A., &
    3. Turner, J. A.
    (2015). Customizing virtual globe tours to enhance community awareness of local landscape benefits. Landscape and Urban Planning, 142, 106–119.
    OpenUrl
    1. Holland, J. M.,
    2. Douma, J. C.,
    3. Crowley, L.,
    4. James, L.,
    5. Kor, L.,
    6. Stevenson, D. R. W., &
    7. Smith, B. M.
    (2017). Semi-natural habitats support biological control, pollination and soil conservation in Europe: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 37, 31 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0434-x
    OpenUrl
  5. IPES-Food. (2016). From uniformity to diversity: A paradigm shift from industrial agriculture to diversified agroecological systems. http://www.ipes-food.org/images/Reports/UniformityToDiversity_FullReport.pdf
  6. IUCN [International Union for Conservation of Nature]. (2021). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2021-1. https://www.iucnredlist.org
    1. Iverson, L. R.
    (1988). Land-use changes in Illinois, USA: the influence of landscape attributes on current and historic land use. Landscape Ecology, 2, 45–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Jackson, M. T.
    (1997). The natural heritage of Indiana. Indiana University Press.
    1. Klopatek, J. J.,
    2. Olson, R. J.,
    3. Emerson, C. J., &
    4. Jones, J. L.
    (1979). Land-use conflicts with natural vegetation in the United States. Environmental Conservation 6, 191–199.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Kremen, C., &
    2. Merenlender, A. M.
    (2018). Landscapes that work for biodiversity and people. Science 362: 6412. eaau6020. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau6020
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Kremen, C., &
    2. Miles, A.
    (2012). Ecosystem services in biologically diversified versus conventional farming systems: Benefits, externalities, and trade-offs. Ecology and Society, 17(4), 40.
    OpenUrl
  7. LAF [Landscape Architecture Foundation]. (2016). New landscape declaration. https://www.lafoundation.org/take-action/new-landscape-declaration
    1. Lark, T. J.,
    2. Spawn, S. A.,
    3. Bougie, M., &
    4. Gibbs, H. K.
    (2020). Cropland expansion in the United States produces marginal yields at high costs to wildlife. Nature Communications 11, 4295. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18045-z.
    OpenUrl
    1. Lavorel, S.,
    2. Locatelli, B.,
    3. Colloff, M. J., &
    4. Bruley, E.
    (2020). Coproducing ecosystem services for adapting to climate change. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 375 (1794), 20190119.
    OpenUrl
    1. Legagneux, P.,
    2. Casujus, N.,
    3. Cazelles, K.,
    4. Chevallier, C.,
    5. Chevrinais, M.,
    6. Guéry, L.,
    7. Jacquet, C.,
    8. Jaffré, M.,
    9. Naud, M.-J.,
    10. Noisette, F.,
    11. Ropars, P.,
    12. Vissault, S.,
    13. Archambault, P.,
    14. Bêty, J.,
    15. Berteaux, D., &
    16. Gravel, D.
    (2018). Our house is burning: Discrepancy in climate change vs. biodiversity coverage in the media as compared to scientific literature. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 175. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2017.00175
    OpenUrl
    1. Lovett, A.,
    2. Appleton, K.,
    3. Warren-Kretzschmar, B., &
    4. Von Haaren, C.
    (2015). Using 3D visualization methods in landscape planning: An evaluation of options and practical issues. Landscape and Urban Planning, 142, 85–94.
    OpenUrl
    1. Martin, L.,
    2. Alvarez, J. and
    3. Taly, A.
    (2021). Serious games for vocational training: From emotional labor to knowledge transfer. In M.-E. B. Chaumon (Ed.), Digital transformations in the challenge of activity and work: Understanding and supporting technological changes. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119808343.ch5
    1. Mauz, I.,
    2. Fischer, A.,
    3. Langers, F.,
    4. Young, J.,
    5. Bednar-Friedl, B.,
    6. Grunberger, S., &
    7. Musceleanu, O.
    (2009). Perceiving biodiversity changes in daily life: Insights from an exploratory survey across Europe. Journal on Protected Mountain Areas Research and Management, 1(2), 39–45.
    OpenUrl
    1. Morton, L. W.,
    2. Roesch-McNally, G., &
    3. Wilke, A. K.
    (2017). Upper Midwest farmer perceptions: Too much uncertainty about impacts of climate change to justify changing current agricultural practices. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 72 (3), 215–225.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. NASA. (2019a). Visible earth. https://visibleearth.nasa.gov
  9. NASA. (2019b). Climate time machine. Global climate change: vital signs of the planet. https://climate.nasa.gov/interactives/climate-time-machine
    1. Nassauer, J. I.,
    2. Corry, R. C., &
    3. Curse, R. M
    (2002). The landscape in 2025: Alternative future landscape scenarios: A means to consider agricultural policy. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 57(2): 45–53.
    OpenUrl
    1. Nassauer, J. I., &
    2. Opdam, P.
    (2008). Design in science: extending the landscape ecology paradigm. Landscape Ecology, 23, 633–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-008-9226-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  10. OneZoom. (2019). Tree of life explorer. https://www.onezoom.org/life/
    1. O’Neill, R. V.,
    2. Krummel, J. R.,
    3. Gardner, R. H.,
    4. Sugihara, G.,
    5. Jackson, B.,
    6. DeAngelis, D. L.,
    7. Milne, B. T.,
    8. Turner, M. G.,
    9. Zygmunt, B.,
    10. Christensen, S. W.,
    11. Dale, V. H, &
    12. Graham, R. L.
    (1988). Indices of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology, 1, 153–162.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Osorio, R. J.,
    2. Barden, C. J., &
    3. Ciampitti, I. A.
    (2019). A GIS approach to estimate windbreak crop yield effects in Kansas- Nebraska. Agroforestry Systems, 93, 1567–1576.
    OpenUrl
    1. Otto, S.,
    2. Lazzaro, L.,
    3. Finizio, A., &
    4. Zain, G.
    (2009). Estimating ecotoxicological effects of pesticide drift on non-target arthropods in field hedgerows. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 28(4), 853–63.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Paustian, K.
    2. Andren, O.,
    3. Janzen, H. H.,
    4. Lal, R.,
    5. Smith, P.,
    6. Tian, G.,
    7. Tiessen, H.,
    8. Van Noordwijk, M., &
    9. Woomer, P. L.
    (1997). Agricultural soils as a sink to mitigate carbon dioxide emissions. Soil Use Management, 13(4), 230–244.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Pett, T. J.,
    2. Shwartz, A.,
    3. Irvine, K. N.,
    4. Dallime, M., &
    5. Davies, Z. G.
    (2016). Unpacking the people–biodiversity paradox: A conceptual framework. BioScience, 66, 576–583.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Pywell, R. F.,
    2. Heard, M. S.,
    3. Woodcock, B. A.,
    4. Hinsley, S.,
    5. Ridding, L.,
    6. Nowakowski, M., &
    7. Bullock, J. M.
    (2015). Wildlifefriendly farming increases crop yield: evidence for ecological intensification. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 282, 20151740.
    OpenUrl
    1. Ramankutty, N. S.,
    2. Mehrabi, Z.,
    3. Waha, K.,
    4. Jarvis, L.,
    5. Kremen, C.,
    6. Herrero, M., &
    7. Rieseberg, L. H.
    (2018). Trends in global agricultural land use: Implications for environmental health and food security. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 69, 789–815.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Rossano, V.,
    2. Roselli, T., &
    3. Calvano, G.
    (2018). A serious game to promote environmental attitude. In V. L. Uskov, R. J. Howlett, L. C. Jain (Eds.), Smart education and e-learning 2017. Springer.
    1. Schulte, L. A.,
    2. Niemi, J.,
    3. Helmers, M. J.,
    4. Liebman, M.,
    5. Arbuckle, J. G.,
    6. James, D. E.,
    7. Kolka, R. E.
    8. O’Neal, M. E.,
    9. Tomer, T.,
    10. Tyndall, J. C.,
    11. Asbjornsen, H.,
    12. Drobney, P.,
    13. Neal, J.,
    14. Van Ryswyk, G., &
    15. Witte, C.
    (2017). Prairie strips improve biodiversity and the delivery of multiple ecosystem services from cornsoybean croplands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(42), 11247–11252. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1620229114
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Sheppard, S. R. J.
    (2015). Making climate change visible: A critical role for landscape professionals. Landscape and Urban Planning, 142, 95–105.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Slotterback, C. S.,
    2. Runck, B.,
    3. Pitt, D. G.,
    4. Kne, L.,
    5. Jordan, N. R.,
    6. Mulla, D. J.,
    7. Zerger, C., &
    8. Reichenbach, M.
    (2016). Collaborative geodesign to advance multifunctional landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 156, 71–80.
    OpenUrl
    1. Slovic, P.
    (2009). The perception of risk. Earthscan.
    1. Smith, D. P.
    (1981). Iowa prairie—an endangered ecosystem. Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Sciences, 88, 7–10.
    OpenUrl
    1. Staley, J. T.,
    2. Botham, M. S., &
    3. Pywell, R. F.
    (2019). Hedges for invertebrates and plants: How current and historic hedgerow management alters their structural condition and value as a semi-natural habitat. In J. W. Dover (Ed.), The ecology of hedgerows and field margins (pp. 55–71). Routledge.
    1. Stanitsas, M.,
    2. Kirytopoulos, K., &
    3. Vareilles, E.
    (2019). Facilitating sustainability transition through serious games: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 924–936.
    OpenUrl
    1. Stanton, R. L.,
    2. Morrissey, C. A., &
    3. Clark, R. G.
    (2018). Analysis of trends and agricultural drivers of farmland bird declines in North America: A review. Agriculture, Ecosystems, & Environment, 254, 244–254.
    OpenUrl
    1. Strauss, A., &
    2. Corbin, J.
    (2007). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage.
  11. TEDx Talks. (2015, January 2). From landscape architecture to conservation agriculture | Thomas Woltz | TEDxCharlottesville [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9VlY-3V63yI&feature=youtu.be
    1. Thompson, A.,
    2. Reimer, A., &
    3. Prokopy, L.
    (2015). Farmers’ views of the environment: The influence of competing attitude frames on landscape conservation efforts. Agriculture and Human Values, 32: 385–399.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Tooker, J. F.,
    2. O’Neal, M. E., &
    3. Rodriguez-Saona, C.
    (2020). Balancing disturbance and conservation in agroecosystems to improve biological control. Annual Review of Entomology 2020, 65(1), 81–100.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. UN Environment. (2019). New UN decade on ecosystem restoration to inspire bold UN environment assembly decisions. www.unenvironment.org/news-and-stories/story/new-un-decade-ecosystem-restoration-inspire-bold-un-environment-assembly
    1. Uri, N. D.
    (2001). A note on soil erosion and its environmental consequences in the United States, air, and soil pollution. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 129, 181–197.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
  13. USDA [US Department of Agriculture]. (2017). 2017 Census of agriculture: Summary and State Data.
  14. USDA. (2019). Reversing pollinator decline is key to feeding the future.
  15. USDOI [US Department of the Interior]. (2011). National landcover database.
  16. UWSP [University of Wisconsin Stevens Point]. (2019). ZONE! The land use game. https://www.uwsp.edu/cnr-ap/clue/Pages/Land-Use-Game.aspx (Verified February 9, 2022).
    1. Verissimo, D.,
    2. Macmillan, D. C.,
    3. Smith, R. J., &
    4. Davies, Z. G.
    (2014). Has climate change taken prominence over biodiversity conservation? Bioscience, 64, 625–629.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Walker, M. P.,
    2. Dover, J. W.,
    3. Sparks, T. H., &
    4. Hinsley, S. A.
    (2006). Hedges and green lanes: vegetation composition and structure. Biodiversity and conservation, 15, 2595–2610.
    OpenUrl
    1. Weber, E. U.
    (2016). What shapes perceptions of climate change? New research since 2010. WIREs climate change, 7(1), 125–134.
    OpenUrl
    1. Wojtkowski, P.
    (2009). Agroecological economics: Sustainability and biodiversity. Elsevier Press.
    1. Woodcock, B. A.,
    2. Garratt, M. P. D.,
    3. Powney, G. D.,
    4. Shaw, R. F.,
    5. Osborne, J. L.,
    6. Soroka, J.,
    7. Lindström, S. A. M.,
    8. Stanley, D.,
    9. Ouvrard, P.,
    10. Edwards, M. E.,
    11. Jauker, F.,
    12. McCracken, M. E.,
    13. Zou, Y.,
    14. Potts, S. G.,
    15. Rundlöf, M.,
    16. Noriega, J. A.,
    17. Greenop, A.,
    18. Smith, H. G.,
    19. Bommarco, R.,. . .
    20. Pywell, R. F.
    (2019). Meta-analysis reveals that pollinator functional diversity and abundance enhance crop pollination and yield. Nature Communications, 10, 1481.
    OpenUrl
    1. Yin, R. K.
    (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.
    1. Zaccai, E., &
    2. Adams, W. M.
    (2012). How far are biodiversity loss and climate change similar as policy issues? Environment, Development and Sustainability, 14, 557–571.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Landscape Journal: 41 (1)
Landscape Journal
Vol. 41, Issue 1
1 Jan 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Landscape Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Climate BufferNet: A Gaming Simulation Linking Biodiversity Conservation and Climate Change Adaptation with Agricultural Landscape Planning
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Landscape Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Landscape Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Climate BufferNet: A Gaming Simulation Linking Biodiversity Conservation and Climate Change Adaptation with Agricultural Landscape Planning
Aaron William Thompson, Robert Marzec, Gary Burniske
Landscape Journal Jan 2022, 41 (1) 45-60; DOI: 10.3368/lj.41.1.45

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Climate BufferNet: A Gaming Simulation Linking Biodiversity Conservation and Climate Change Adaptation with Agricultural Landscape Planning
Aaron William Thompson, Robert Marzec, Gary Burniske
Landscape Journal Jan 2022, 41 (1) 45-60; DOI: 10.3368/lj.41.1.45
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The Olmsteds and the Land-Grant Universities
  • The Vanishing Landscape of the Southern West Virginia Coalfields
  • Protecting the Identity of Sheep-Farming Landscapes in the Outer Carpathians: A Typology, Delimitation, and Interpretation
Show more Peer-Reviewed Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Green infrastructure
  • agroenviornmental problems
  • serious games in landscape architecture
UWP

© 2023 Landscape Journal

Powered by HighWire