Climate BufferNet

REFERENCES

1. ↵
   1. Almond, R. E. A.,
   2. Grooten M., and
   3. Petersen, T.

   (2020). Living planet report 2020—Bending the curve of biodiversity loss. World Wildlife Fund.
2. ↵
   1. Arbuckle, J. G. , Jr.,
   2. Hobbs, J.,
   3. Loy, A.,
   4. Morton, L. W.,
   5. Prokopy, L., &
   6. Tyndall, J.

   (2014). Understanding farmer perspectives on climate change: Toward effective communication strategies for adaptation and mitigation in the Corn Belt. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 69(6), 505–516.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
3. ↵
   1. Arbuckle, J. G. , Jr.,
   2. Morton, L. W., &
   3. Hobbs, J.

   (2015). Trust, beliefs, and perceived risk as determinants of farmer support for adaptive and mitigative responses to climate change. Environment and Behavior, 47(2), 205–234.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
4. ↵
   1. Blumberg, F. C.,
   2. Almonte, D. E.,
   3. Anthony, J. S., &
   4. Hashimoto, N.

   (2013). Serious Games: What are they? What do they do? Why should we play them? In K. Dill (Ed.), Oxford handbook of media psychology (pp. 334–351). Oxford University Press.
5. ↵
   1. Bowling, L. C.,
   2. Widhalm, M.,
   3. Cherkauer, K. A.,
   4. Beckerman, J.,
   5. Brouder, S.,
   6. Buzan, J.,
   7. Doering, O.,
   8. Dukes, J.,
   9. Ebner, P.,
   10. Frankenburger, J.,
   11. Gramig, B.,
   12. Kladivko, E. J.,
   13. Lee, C.,
   14. Volenec, J., &
   15. Weil, C.

   (2018). Indiana’s agriculture in a changing climate: A report from the Indiana climate change impacts assessment. Agriculture Reports Paper 1. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284316778
6. ↵
   1. Brondizio, E. S.,
   2. Settele, J.,
   3. Díaz, S., &
   4. Ngo, H. T.

   (2019). Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2616458
7. ↵
   1. Burkhard, B., de Groot, R. Costanza, R., Seppelt, R.,
   2. Jørgensen, S. E., &
   3. Potschin, M.

   (2012). Solutions for sustaining natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators, 21, 1–6.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Chan, K. M. A., &
   2. Satterfield, T.

   (2016). Managing cultural ecosystem services for sustainability. In M. Potschin, R. Haines-Young, R. Fish, & R. K. Turner (Eds.), Routledge handbook of ecosystem services (pp. 343–358). Routledge.
9. ↵
   1. Chandler, K. R.,
   2. Stevens, C. J.,
   3. Binley, A., &
   4. Keith, A. M.

   (2018). Influence of tree species and forest land use on soil hydraulic conductivity and implications for surface runoff generation. Geoderma, 310, 120–127.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    CSP [Conservation Science Partners]. (2019). Methods and approach used to estimate the loss and fragmentation of natural lands in the conterminous U.S. from 2001 to 2017. Technical Report. Truckee, CA.
11. ↵
    1. Dahl, T. E.

    (1990). Wetlands losses in the United States from the 1780s to 1980s. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service.
12. ↵
    1. Eastburn, D. J.,
    2. O’Geen, A. T.,
    3. Tate, K. W., &
    4. Roche, L. M.

    (2017). Multiple ecosystem services in a working landscape. PloS ONE 12, e0166595.

    OpenUrlPubMed
13. EPA [Environmental Protection Agency]. (2019). Environmental modeling community of practice. www.epa.gov/ceam
14. ↵
    1. Fagerholm, N., &
    2. Palomo, I.

    (2017). Participatory GIS approaches for mapping ecosystem services. In B. Burkhard, & J. Maes (Eds.), Mapping ecosystem services (pp. 218–222). Pensoft Publishers.
15. ↵
    FAO [Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations] (2019). The state of food and agriculture 2019. Moving forward on food loss and waste reduction. https://doi.org/10.4060/CA6030EN
16. ↵
    1. Fry, L. E.,
    2. Savage, J.,
    3. Hall, A. L.,
    4. Oakley, S.,
    5. Pritchard, W. J.,
    6. Ostle, N. J.,
    7. Pywell, R. F.,
    8. Bullock J. M., &
    9. R. D. Bardgett

    , R. D. (2018). Soil multifunctionality and drought resistance are determined by plant structural traits in restoring grassland. Ecology, 99(10), 2260–2271.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
17. ↵
    Google (2019). Google sustainability. https://sustainability.google/tools/
18. ↵
    1. Grese, R. E.

    (1992). Jens Jensen: Maker of natural parks and gardens. Johns Hopkins University Press.
19. ↵
    1. Gu, Y.,
    2. Deal, B., &
    3. Larsen, L.

    (2018). Geodesign processes and ecological systems thinking in a coupled humanenvironment context: An integrated framework for landscape architecture. Sustainability, 10(9), 3306. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093306

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Haigh, T.,
    2. Takle, E.,
    3. Andresen, J.,
    4. Widhalm, M.,
    5. Carlton, J. S., &
    6. Angel, J.

    (2015). Mapping the decision points and climate information use of agricultural producers across the U.S. Corn Belt. Climate Risk Management, 7, 2030.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Hannah, L.,
    2. Carr, J. L., &
    3. Lankerani, A.

    (1995). Human disturbance and natural habitat: A biome level analysis of a global set. Biodiversity and Conservation, 4, 128–155.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Haris, A. A.,
    2. Chhabra, V., &
    3. Biswas, S.

    (2013). Carbon sequestration for mitigation of climate change—A review. Agricultural reviews, 34(2): 129–136.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Harwood, A. R.,
    2. Lovett, A. A., &
    3. Turner, J. A.

    (2015). Customizing virtual globe tours to enhance community awareness of local landscape benefits. Landscape and Urban Planning, 142, 106–119.

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Holland, J. M.,
    2. Douma, J. C.,
    3. Crowley, L.,
    4. James, L.,
    5. Kor, L.,
    6. Stevenson, D. R. W., &
    7. Smith, B. M.

    (2017). Semi-natural habitats support biological control, pollination and soil conservation in Europe: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 37, 31 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0434-x

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    IPES-Food. (2016). From uniformity to diversity: A paradigm shift from industrial agriculture to diversified agroecological systems. http://www.ipes-food.org/images/Reports/UniformityToDiversity_FullReport.pdf
26. IUCN [International Union for Conservation of Nature]. (2021). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2021-1. https://www.iucnredlist.org
27. ↵
    1. Iverson, L. R.

    (1988). Land-use changes in Illinois, USA: the influence of landscape attributes on current and historic land use. Landscape Ecology, 2, 45–61.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
28. ↵
    1. Jackson, M. T.

    (1997). The natural heritage of Indiana. Indiana University Press.
29. ↵
    1. Klopatek, J. J.,
    2. Olson, R. J.,
    3. Emerson, C. J., &
    4. Jones, J. L.

    (1979). Land-use conflicts with natural vegetation in the United States. Environmental Conservation 6, 191–199.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
30. ↵
    1. Kremen, C., &
    2. Merenlender, A. M.

    (2018). Landscapes that work for biodiversity and people. Science 362: 6412. eaau6020. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau6020

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
31. ↵
    1. Kremen, C., &
    2. Miles, A.

    (2012). Ecosystem services in biologically diversified versus conventional farming systems: Benefits, externalities, and trade-offs. Ecology and Society, 17(4), 40.

    OpenUrl
32. LAF [Landscape Architecture Foundation]. (2016). New landscape declaration. https://www.lafoundation.org/take-action/new-landscape-declaration
33. ↵
    1. Lark, T. J.,
    2. Spawn, S. A.,
    3. Bougie, M., &
    4. Gibbs, H. K.

    (2020). Cropland expansion in the United States produces marginal yields at high costs to wildlife. Nature Communications 11, 4295. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18045-z.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Lavorel, S.,
    2. Locatelli, B.,
    3. Colloff, M. J., &
    4. Bruley, E.

    (2020). Coproducing ecosystem services for adapting to climate change. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 375 (1794), 20190119.

    OpenUrl
35. ↵
    1. Legagneux, P.,
    2. Casujus, N.,
    3. Cazelles, K.,
    4. Chevallier, C.,
    5. Chevrinais, M.,
    6. Guéry, L.,
    7. Jacquet, C.,
    8. Jaffré, M.,
    9. Naud, M.-J.,
    10. Noisette, F.,
    11. Ropars, P.,
    12. Vissault, S.,
    13. Archambault, P.,
    14. Bêty, J.,
    15. Berteaux, D., &
    16. Gravel, D.

    (2018). Our house is burning: Discrepancy in climate change vs. biodiversity coverage in the media as compared to scientific literature. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 175. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2017.00175

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Lovett, A.,
    2. Appleton, K.,
    3. Warren-Kretzschmar, B., &
    4. Von Haaren, C.

    (2015). Using 3D visualization methods in landscape planning: An evaluation of options and practical issues. Landscape and Urban Planning, 142, 85–94.

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Martin, L.,
    2. Alvarez, J. and
    3. Taly, A.

    (2021). Serious games for vocational training: From emotional labor to knowledge transfer. In M.-E. B. Chaumon (Ed.), Digital transformations in the challenge of activity and work: Understanding and supporting technological changes. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119808343.ch5
38. ↵
    1. Mauz, I.,
    2. Fischer, A.,
    3. Langers, F.,
    4. Young, J.,
    5. Bednar-Friedl, B.,
    6. Grunberger, S., &
    7. Musceleanu, O.

    (2009). Perceiving biodiversity changes in daily life: Insights from an exploratory survey across Europe. Journal on Protected Mountain Areas Research and Management, 1(2), 39–45.

    OpenUrl
39. ↵
    1. Morton, L. W.,
    2. Roesch-McNally, G., &
    3. Wilke, A. K.

    (2017). Upper Midwest farmer perceptions: Too much uncertainty about impacts of climate change to justify changing current agricultural practices. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 72 (3), 215–225.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
40. ↵
    NASA. (2019a). Visible earth. https://visibleearth.nasa.gov
41. ↵
    NASA. (2019b). Climate time machine. Global climate change: vital signs of the planet. https://climate.nasa.gov/interactives/climate-time-machine
42. 1. Nassauer, J. I.,
    2. Corry, R. C., &
    3. Curse, R. M

    (2002). The landscape in 2025: Alternative future landscape scenarios: A means to consider agricultural policy. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 57(2): 45–53.

    OpenUrl
43. ↵
    1. Nassauer, J. I., &
    2. Opdam, P.

    (2008). Design in science: extending the landscape ecology paradigm. Landscape Ecology, 23, 633–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-008-9226-7

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
44. ↵
    OneZoom. (2019). Tree of life explorer. https://www.onezoom.org/life/
45. ↵
    1. O’Neill, R. V.,
    2. Krummel, J. R.,
    3. Gardner, R. H.,
    4. Sugihara, G.,
    5. Jackson, B.,
    6. DeAngelis, D. L.,
    7. Milne, B. T.,
    8. Turner, M. G.,
    9. Zygmunt, B.,
    10. Christensen, S. W.,
    11. Dale, V. H, &
    12. Graham, R. L.

    (1988). Indices of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology, 1, 153–162.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
46. ↵
    1. Osorio, R. J.,
    2. Barden, C. J., &
    3. Ciampitti, I. A.

    (2019). A GIS approach to estimate windbreak crop yield effects in Kansas-Nebraska. Agroforestry Systems, 93, 1567–1576.

    OpenUrl
47. ↵
    1. Otto, S.,
    2. Lazzaro, L.,
    3. Finizio, A., &
    4. Zain, G.

    (2009). Estimating ecotoxicological effects of pesticide drift on non-target arthropods in field hedgerows. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 28(4), 853–63.

    OpenUrlPubMed
48. ↵
    1. Paustian, K.
    2. Andren, O.,
    3. Janzen, H. H.,
    4. Lal, R.,
    5. Smith, P.,
    6. Tian, G.,
    7. Tiessen, H.,
    8. Van Noordwijk, M., &
    9. Woomer, P. L.

    (1997). Agricultural soils as a sink to mitigate carbon dioxide emissions. Soil Use Management, 13(4), 230–244.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
49. ↵
    1. Pett, T. J.,
    2. Shwartz, A.,
    3. Irvine, K. N.,
    4. Dallime, M., &
    5. Davies, Z. G.

    (2016). Unpacking the people–biodiversity paradox: A conceptual framework. BioScience, 66, 576–583.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
50. ↵
    1. Pywell, R. F.,
    2. Heard, M. S.,
    3. Woodcock, B. A.,
    4. Hinsley, S.,
    5. Ridding, L.,
    6. Nowakowski, M., &
    7. Bullock, J. M.

    (2015). Wildlifefriendly farming increases crop yield: evidence for ecological intensification. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 282, 20151740.

    OpenUrl
51. ↵
    1. Ramankutty, N. S.,
    2. Mehrabi, Z.,
    3. Waha, K.,
    4. Jarvis, L.,
    5. Kremen, C.,
    6. Herrero, M., &
    7. Rieseberg, L. H.

    (2018). Trends in global agricultural land use: Implications for environmental health and food security. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 69, 789–815.

    OpenUrlPubMed
52. ↵
    1. Rossano, V.,
    2. Roselli, T., &
    3. Calvano, G.

    (2018). A serious game to promote environmental attitude. In V. L. Uskov, R. J. Howlett, L. C. Jain (Eds.), Smart education and e-learning 2017. Springer.
53. ↵
    1. Schulte, L. A.,
    2. Niemi, J.,
    3. Helmers, M. J.,
    4. Liebman, M.,
    5. Arbuckle, J. G.,
    6. James, D. E.,
    7. Kolka, R. E.
    8. O’Neal, M. E.,
    9. Tomer, T.,
    10. Tyndall, J. C.,
    11. Asbjornsen, H.,
    12. Drobney, P.,
    13. Neal, J.,
    14. Van Ryswyk, G., &
    15. Witte, C.

    (2017). Prairie strips improve biodiversity and the delivery of multiple ecosystem services from cornsoybean croplands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(42), 11247–11252. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1620229114

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
54. ↵
    1. Sheppard, S. R. J.

    (2015). Making climate change visible: A critical role for landscape professionals. Landscape and Urban Planning, 142, 95–105.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
55. ↵
    1. Slotterback, C. S.,
    2. Runck, B.,
    3. Pitt, D. G.,
    4. Kne, L.,
    5. Jordan, N. R.,
    6. Mulla, D. J.,
    7. Zerger, C., &
    8. Reichenbach, M.

    (2016). Collaborative geodesign to advance multifunctional landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 156, 71–80.

    OpenUrl
56. ↵
    1. Slovic, P.

    (2009). The perception of risk. Earthscan.
57. ↵
    1. Smith, D. P.

    (1981). Iowa prairie—an endangered ecosystem. Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Sciences, 88, 7–10.

    OpenUrl
58. ↵
    1. Staley, J. T.,
    2. Botham, M. S., &
    3. Pywell, R. F.

    (2019). Hedges for invertebrates and plants: How current and historic hedgerow management alters their structural condition and value as a semi-natural habitat. In J. W. Dover (Ed.), The ecology of hedgerows and field margins (pp. 55–71). Routledge.
59. ↵
    1. Stanitsas, M.,
    2. Kirytopoulos, K., &
    3. Vareilles, E.

    (2019). Facilitating sustainability transition through serious games: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 924–936.

    OpenUrl
60. ↵
    1. Stanton, R. L.,
    2. Morrissey, C. A., &
    3. Clark, R. G.

    (2018). Analysis of trends and agricultural drivers of farmland bird declines in North America: A review. Agriculture, Ecosystems, & Environment, 254, 244–254.

    OpenUrl
61. ↵
    1. Strauss, A., &
    2. Corbin, J.

    (2007). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage.
62. ↵
    TEDx Talks. (2015, January 2). From landscape architecture to conservation agriculture | Thomas Woltz | TEDxCharlottesville [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9VlY-3V63yI&feature=youtu.be
63. ↵
    1. Thompson, A.,
    2. Reimer, A., &
    3. Prokopy, L.

    (2015). Farmers’ views of the environment: The influence of competing attitude frames on landscape conservation efforts. Agriculture and Human Values, 32: 385–399.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
64. ↵
    1. Tooker, J. F.,
    2. O’Neal, M. E., &
    3. Rodriguez-Saona, C.

    (2020). Balancing disturbance and conservation in agroecosystems to improve biological control. Annual Review of Entomology 2020, 65(1), 81–100.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
65. UN Environment. (2019). New UN decade on ecosystem restoration to inspire bold UN environment assembly decisions. www.unenvironment.org/news-and-stories/story/new-un-decade-ecosystem-restoration-inspire-bold-un-environment-assembly
66. ↵
    1. Uri, N. D.

    (2001). A note on soil erosion and its environmental consequences in the United States, air, and soil pollution. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 129, 181–197.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
67. ↵
    USDA [US Department of Agriculture]. (2017). 2017 Census of agriculture: Summary and State Data.
68. ↵
    USDA. (2019). Reversing pollinator decline is key to feeding the future.
69. ↵
    USDOI [US Department of the Interior]. (2011). National landcover database.
70. UWSP [University of Wisconsin Stevens Point]. (2019). ZONE! The land use game. https://www.uwsp.edu/cnr-ap/clue/Pages/Land-Use-Game.aspx (Verified February 9, 2022).
71. ↵
    1. Verissimo, D.,
    2. Macmillan, D. C.,
    3. Smith, R. J., &
    4. Davies, Z. G.

    (2014). Has climate change taken prominence over biodiversity conservation? Bioscience, 64, 625–629.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
72. ↵
    1. Walker, M. P.,
    2. Dover, J. W.,
    3. Sparks, T. H., &
    4. Hinsley, S. A.

    (2006). Hedges and green lanes: vegetation composition and structure. Biodiversity and conservation, 15, 2595–2610.

    OpenUrl
73. ↵
    1. Weber, E. U.

    (2016). What shapes perceptions of climate change? New research since 2010. WIREs climate change, 7(1), 125–134.

    OpenUrl
74. ↵
    1. Wojtkowski, P.

    (2009). Agroecological economics: Sustainability and biodiversity. Elsevier Press.
75. ↵
    1. Woodcock, B. A.,
    2. Garratt, M. P. D.,
    3. Powney, G. D.,
    4. Shaw, R. F.,
    5. Osborne, J. L.,
    6. Soroka, J.,
    7. Lindström, S. A. M.,
    8. Stanley, D.,
    9. Ouvrard, P.,
    10. Edwards, M. E.,
    11. Jauker, F.,
    12. McCracken, M. E.,
    13. Zou, Y.,
    14. Potts, S. G.,
    15. Rundlöf, M.,
    16. Noriega, J. A.,
    17. Greenop, A.,
    18. Smith, H. G.,
    19. Bommarco, R., …
    20. Pywell, R. F.

    (2019). Meta-analysis reveals that pollinator functional diversity and abundance enhance crop pollination and yield. Nature Communications, 10, 1481.

    OpenUrl
76. ↵
    1. Yin, R. K.

    (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.
77. ↵
    1. Zaccai, E., &
    2. Adams, W. M.

    (2012). How far are biodiversity loss and climate change similar as policy issues? Environment, Development and Sustainability, 14, 557–571.

    OpenUrlCrossRef