Policy Brief

REFERENCES

1. AAG (American Association of Geographers). (n.d.). AAG NYC 2022 Annual Meeting. https://www2.aag.org/aag2022nyc/
2. AGU (American Geophysical Union). (2021). About AGU Fall Meeting 2021. https://www.agu.org/Fall-Meeting/Pages/About
3. ↵
   1. Anderson, K.

   (2012). The inconvenient truth of carbon offsets. Nature, 484(7392), 7. https://www.nature.com/news/the-inconvenient-truth-of-carbon-offsets-1.10373

   OpenUrlPubMed
4. ↵
   ASLA. (2011). ASLA Annual Meeting and EXPO Registration Brochure. https://www.asla.org/2011meeting/RegBroch.pdf
5. ASLA. (2017a). Annual Operating Plan. https://www.asla.org/uploadedFiles/CMS/About__Us/Leadership/Leadership_Handbook/Meeting_Agenda_Books/2016_BOT_Annual_Meeting/Tab_C_2017AOP.pdf
6. ↵
   ASLA. (2018). PHL2018 annual meeting and EXPO registration program.
7. ↵
   ASLA. (2019a). ASLA SAN2019 Conference on Landscape Architecture registration program.
8. ↵
   ASLA. (2019b). ASLA Conference floor plan and exhibitor list. https://s36.a2zinc.net/clients/ASLA/ASLA2019/Public/EventMap.aspx?shMode=E
9. ↵
   ASLA. (2020). ASLA MIA2020. EXPO. https://www.aslaconference.com/expo/
10. ↵
    ASLA (2021a). About: Toward net-zero-emission operations. https://www.asla.org/sustainableasla.aspx
11. ↵
    ASLA. (2021b). Landscape architects design vibrant, resilient, and just communities for all—recommendations for the Biden-Harris Administration. https://www.asla.org/uploadedFiles/CMS/Government_Affairs/ASLATransitionDocument2020.pdf
12. ↵
    ASLA Board of Trustees. (2016). Tab E. agenda item #7: 2017– 2018 operating budget. https://www.asla.org/uploadedFiles/CMS/About__Us/Leadership/Leadership_Handbook/Meeting_Agenda_Books/2016_BOT_Annual_Meeting/Tab_E_2017-18%20Operating%20Budget.docx
13. ↵
    1. Attari, S. Z.,
    2. Krantz, D. H., &
    3. Weber, E. U.

    (2016). Statements about climate researchers’ carbon footprints affect their credibility and the impact of their advice. Climatic Change, 138, 325–338. https://doi.org10.1007/s10584-016-1713-2

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Attari, S. Z.,
    2. Krantz, D. H., &
    3. Weber, E. U.

    (2019). Climate change communicators’ carbon footprints affect their audience’s policy support. Climatic Change, 154, 529–545. https://doi.org10.1007/s10584-019-02463-0

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Baumeister, S.

    (2017). “Each flight is different”: Carbon emissions of selected flights in three geographical markets. Transportation Research Part D, 57, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.08.020

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Bousema, T.,
    2. Selvaraj, P.,
    3. Djimde, A. A.,
    4. Yakar, D.,
    5. Hagedorn, B.,
    6. Pratt, A.,
    7. Barret, D.,
    8. Whitfield, K., &
    9. Cohen, J. M.

    (2020). Reducing the carbon footprint of academic conferences: The example of the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 103(5), 1758–1761. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.20-1013

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
17. Carbon Footprint. Carbon calculator. https://www.carbonfootprint.com/calculator.aspx
18. ↵
    1. Chakravarty, S.,
    2. Chikkatur, A.,
    3. de Coninck, H.,
    4. Pascala, S.,
    5. Socolow, R., &
    6. Tavoni, M.

    (2009). Sharing global CO2 emission reductions among one billion high emitters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(29), 11884–11888. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905232106

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
19. ↵
    1. Chavaillaz, Y.,
    2. Roy, P.,
    3. Partanen, A-I,
    4. Da Silva, L.,
    5. Bresson, É.,
    6. Mengis, N.,
    7. Chaumont, D., &
    8. Matthews, H. D.

    (2019). Exposure to excessive heat and impacts on labour productivity linked to cumulative CO₂ emissions. Scientific Reports, 9, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50047-w

    OpenUrl
20. City of Philadelphia. (2020). Office of sustainability building benchmarking index. https://www.phillybuildingbenchmarking.com/
21. Climate Watch. (n.d.). Historical GHG emissions. https://www.climatewatchdata.org/ghg-emissions?calculation=PER_CAPITA&end_year=2018&gases=co2&regions=SSA&start_year=1990
22. CELA. (Council of Educators in Landscape Architecture). (n.d.). CELA 2022 Annual Conference Overview. https://www.openconf.org/cela2022/track1/openconf.php
23. ↵
    1. Coroama, V. C.,
    2. Hilty, L. M., &
    3. Birtel, M.

    (2012). Effects of internet-based multiple-site conferences on greenhouse gas emissions. Telematics and Informatics, 29, 362–374. https://doi.org10.1016/j.tele.2011.11.006

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Derudder, B., &
    2. Liu, X.

    (2016). How international is the Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers? A social network analysis perspective. Environment and Planning A, 48(2), 309–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X15611892

    OpenUrlCrossRef
25. EIA (U.S. Energy Information Administration). (2020). Frequently asked questions. How much carbon dioxide is produced per kilowatthour of U.S. Electricity generation? https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=74&t=11
26. Eurocontrol. (2021). Data Snapshot on CO₂ emissions by flight distance. eurocontrol-data-snapshot-co2-by-distance.pdf
27. ↵
    1. Forret, M. L., &
    2. Dougherty, T. W.

    (2004). Networking behaviors and career outcomes: differences for men and women? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 419–437. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.253

    OpenUrlCrossRef
28. ↵
    1. Gegenfurtner, A., &
    2. Ebner, C.

    (2019). Webinars in higher education and professional training: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 28, 100293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100293

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Gössling, S., &
    2. Peeters, P.

    (2015). Assessing tourism’s global environmental impact 1900-2050. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23(5), 639–659. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2015.1008500

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. Hagmann, D.,
    2. Ho, E. H., &
    3. Loewenstein, G.

    (2019). Nudging out support for a carbon tax. Nature Climate Change, 9, 484–489. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0474-0

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. Hausfather, Z.

    (2017.) Analysis: Why U.S. carbon emissions have fallen 14% since 2005. Carbon Brief. https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-why-us-carbon-emissions-have-fallen-14-since-2005
32. ↵
    1. Hischier, R., &
    2. Hilty, L.

    (2002). Environmental impacts of an international conference. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 22, 543–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00027-6

    OpenUrlCrossRef
33. ICAO. (2020). Carbon emissions calculator. https://www.icao.int/environmental-protection/CarbonOffset/Pages/default.aspx
34. ↵
    IPCC. (1999). Summary for policymakers. Aviation and the global atmosphere. Cambridge University Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/av-en-1.pdf
35. ↵
    IPCC. (2018). Summary for policymakers. Global Warming of 1.5° C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. World Meteorological Organization. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/
36. ↵
    1. Jäckle, S.

    (2019). WE have to change! The carbon footprint of ECPR general conferences and ways to reduce it. European Political Science, 18, 630–650. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-019-00220-6

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Jäckle, S.

    (2021). Reducing the carbon footprint of academic conferences by online participation: The case of the 2020 virtual European Consortium for Political Research General Conference. Political Science & Politics, 54(3), 456–461. https:doi.org/10.1017/S1049096521000020

    OpenUrl
38. ↵
    1. Jungbluth, N., &
    2. Meili, C.

    (2019). Recommendation for calculation of the global warming potential of aviation including the radiative forcing index. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 24, 404–411. https://doi.org10.1007/s11367-018-1556-3

    OpenUrl
39. 1. Kalmus, P.

    (2017). Being the change: Live well and spark a climate revolution. New Society.
40. 1. Klöwer, M.

    (2019). The travel carbon footprint of the AGU fall meeting 2019. https://github.com/milankl/CarbonFootprintAGU https://doi.org10.5281/zenodo.3555424
41. ↵
    1. Klöwer, M.,
    2. Hopkins, D.,
    3. Allen, M., &
    4. Higham, J.

    (2019). An analysis of ways to decarbonize conference travel after COVID-19. Nature, 583, 356–359. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3553784

    OpenUrl
42. ↵
    1. Kuper, R.

    (2019). Travel-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions from American Society of Landscape Architects’ Annual Meetings. Landscape Journal 38(1-2):105–125. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.38.1-2.105

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
43. ↵
    1. Liu, H.,
    2. Xu, Y. A.,
    3. Stockwell, N.,
    4. Rodgers, M. O., &
    5. Guensler, R.

    (2016). A comparative life-cycle energy and emissions analysis for intercity passenger transportation in the U.S. by aviation, intercity bus, and automobile. Transportation Research Part D, 48, 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.08.027

    OpenUrl
44. ↵
    1. Lortie, C. J.

    (2020). Online conferences for better learning. Ecology and Evolution, 10, 12442–12449. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6923

    OpenUrl
45. ↵
    1. Moen, B. N.

    (2014). Professional development in landscape architecture: Professionalization, geographic trends, and research consumption [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Graduate College at The University of Illinois and Urbana-Champaign. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/49764
46. ↵
    1. Neugebauer, S.,
    2. Bolz, M.,
    3. Mankaa, R., &
    4. Traverso, M.

    (2020). How sustainable are sustainability conferences?— Comprehensive life cycle assessment of an international conference series in Europe. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clepro.2019.118516

    OpenUrl
47. ↵
    1. Nolt, J.

    (2011). How harmful are the average American’s greenhouse gas emissions? Ethics, Policy, and Environment, 14(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2011.5611584

    OpenUrl
48. ↵
    1. Nolt, J.

    (2013). Replies to critics of “How harmful are the average American’s greenhouse gas emissions?” Ethics, Policy, and Environment, 16(1), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2013.768399

    OpenUrl
49. ↵
    1. Nolt, J.

    (2015). Casualties as a moral measure of climate change. Climatic Change, 130, 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1131-2

    OpenUrl
50. ↵
    1. Oester, S.,
    2. Cigliano, J. A.,
    3. Hind-Ozan, E. J., &
    4. Parsons, E. C. M.

    (2017). Why conferences matter—an illustration from the International Marine Conservation Congress. Frontiers in Marine Science, 4, Article 257. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00257

    OpenUrl
51. ↵
    1. Orsi, F.

    (2012). Cutting the carbon emission of international conferences: Is decentralization an option? Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 462–466. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.04.010

    OpenUrl
52. ↵
    1. Owen, B.,
    2. Lee, D. S.,
    3. Lim, L.

    (2010). Flying into the future: Aviation emissions scenarios to 2050. Environmental Science & Technology, 44(7), 2255–2260. https://doi.org/10.1021/es902530z

    OpenUrl
53. ↵
    1. Pandian, A.

    (2018). Reflections on #displace18. Society of Cultural Anthropology. https://culanth.org/about/about-the-society/announcements/reflections-on-displace18
54. ↵
    1. Parncutt. R.

    (2019). The human cost of anthropogenic global warming: Semi-quantitative prediction and the 1,000-tonne rule. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02323

    OpenUrl
55. ↵
    1. Pearlman, D. M., &
    2. Gates, N. A.

    (2010). Hosting business meetings and special events in virtual worlds: A fad or the future? Journal of Convention & Event Tourism, 11(4), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/15470148.2010.530535

    OpenUrlCrossRef
56. ↵
    1. Peeters, P.,
    2. Higham, J.,
    3. Kutzner, D.,
    4. Cohen. S., &
    5. Gössling, S.

    (2016). Are technology myths stalling aviation climate policy? Transportation Research Part D, 44, 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1016.j.trd.2016.02.004

    OpenUrl
57. Pennsylvania Convention Center (Managed by SMG). (2018). Annual sustainability report. https://www.paconvention.com/assets/doc/SMG-PCCA-Sustainability-2018-Annual-Report-b808f1960b.pdf
58. ↵
    Pennsylvania Department of State. (2020). State Board of Landscape Architects. 10/18/21 Continuing Education Update. https://www.dos.pa.gov/ProfessionalLicensing/BoardsCommissions/LandscapeArchitects/Pages/default.aspx
59. ↵
    1. Ponette-González, A. G., &
    2. Byrnes, J. E.

    (2011). Sustainable science? Reducing the carbon impact of scientific megameetings. Ethnobiology Letters, 2, 65–71. https://doi.org/10.14237/ebl.2.2011.29

    OpenUrl
60. ↵
    1. Raby, C. L., &
    2. Madden, J. R.

    (2021a). Moving academic conferences online: Aids and barriers to delegate participation. Ecology and Evolution, 11, 3646–3655. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7376

    OpenUrlCrossRef
61. ↵
    1. Raby, C. L., &
    2. Madden, J. R.

    (2021b). Moving academic conferences online: Understanding patterns of delegate engagement. Ecology and Evolution, 11, 3607–3615. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7251

    OpenUrl
62. ↵
    1. Ricaurte, R., &
    2. Jagarajan, R.

    (2020). Hotel sustainability benchmarking index 2020: Carbon, energy, and water. The Center for Hospitality Research at Cornell University. Cornell Hospitality Report, 20(10), 1–23. https://ecommons.cornell.edu/handle/1813/74089

    OpenUrl
63. ↵
    1. Spinellis, D., &
    2. Louridas, P.

    (2013). The carbon footprint of conference papers. PLOS ONE, 8(6), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066508

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
64. ↵
    1. Stohl, A.

    (2008). The travel-related carbon dioxide emissions of atmospheric researchers. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 8, 6499–6508. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6499-2008

    OpenUrl
65. ↵
    1. Stroeve, J., &
    2. Notz, D.

    (2018). Changing state of Arctic sea ice across all seasons. Environmental Research Letters, 13, Article 103001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aade56

    OpenUrl
66. ↵
    1. Stroud, J. T., &
    2. Feeley, K. J.

    (2015). Responsible academia: Optimizing conference locations to minimize greenhouse gas emissions. Ecography, 38, 402–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.01366

    OpenUrl
67. ↵
    1. Toniolo, S.,
    2. Mazzi, A.,
    3. Fedele, A.,
    4. Aguiari, F., &
    5. Scipioni, A.

    (2017). Life Cycle Assessment to support the quantification of the environmental impacts of an event. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 63, 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.07.007

    OpenUrl
68. ↵
    1. Tretyakevich, N., &
    2. Maggi, R.

    (2012). Not just for business: Some evidence on leisure motivations of conference attendees. Current Issues in Tourism, 15(4), 391–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2011.592180

    OpenUrl
69. ↵
    USA NDC. (2016.) USA First Nationally Determined Contribution. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). NDC Registry. https://www4.unfccc.int/sites/ndcstaging/PublishedDocuments/United%20States%20of%20America%20First/U.S.A.%20First%20NDC%20Submission.pdf
70. ↵
    USA NDC (2021.) Reducing greenhouse gases in the United States: A 2030 emissions target. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). NDC Registry. https://www4.unfccc.int/sites/ndcstaging/PublishedDocuments/United%20States%20of%20America%20First/United%20States%20NDC%20April%2021%202021%20Final.pdf
71. ↵
    1. van Riper, C. J.,
    2. van Riper III, C.,
    3. Kyle, G. T., &
    4. Lee, M. E.

    (2013). Understanding how social networking influences perceived satisfaction with conference experiences. Annals of Leisure Research, 16(1), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2013.772867

    OpenUrl
72. ↵
    1. Vicedo-Cabrera, A. M.,
    2. Scovronick, N.,
    3. Sera, F.,
    4. Royé, D.,
    5. Schneider, R., …
    6. Gasparrini, A.

    (2021). The burden of heat-related mortality attributable to recent human-induced climate change. Nature Climate Change, 11, 492–500. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01058-x

    OpenUrl
73. ↵
    1. Werfel, S. H.

    (2017). Household behavior crowds out support for climate policy when sufficient progress is perceived. Nature Climate Change, 7, 512–516. https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE3316

    OpenUrl
74. ↵
    1. Wiederhold, B. K.

    (2020). Connecting through technology during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: Avoiding “Zoom fatigue.” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23 (7), 437–438. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.29188.bkw

    OpenUrl
75. ↵
    1. Wilde, P.

    (2020). We don’t need aviation offsets: Institutions and individuals can own their carbon emissions. https://academicflyingblog.wordpress.com/2020/02/04/we-dont-need-aviation-offsets-institutions-and-individuals-can-own-their-carbon-emissions/comment-page-1/
76. ↵
    1. Wolff, H.-G., &
    2. Moser, K.

    (2009). Effects of networking on career success: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 196–206. https:/doi.org/10.1037/a0013350

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
77. ↵
    WWF-Climate Nexus-Ceres. (2017). We Are Still In. https://www.wearestillin.com/organization/american-society-landscape-architects-asla
78. ↵
    1. Wynes, S.,
    2. Donner, S. D.,
    3. Tannason, S., &
    4. Nabors, N.

    (2019). Academic air travel has a limited influence on professional success. Journal of Cleaner Production, 226, 959–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.109

    OpenUrl