A Qualitative Study of Practitioner Perspectives on Landscape Architecture and Equity

REFERENCES

1. American Society of Landscape Architects [ASLA]. (n.d.-a) Diversity, equity, and inclusion. Retrieved June 14, 2021, from https://www.asla.org/DEI.aspx
2. American Society of Landscape Architects [ASLA]. (n.d.-b) Environmental Justice Retrieved July 17, 2021, from https://www.asla.org/justice.aspx
3. 1. Anguelovski, I.

   (2016). From toxic sites to parks as (green) LULUs? New challenges of inequity, privilege, gentrification, and exclusion for urban environmental justice. Journal of Planning Literature, 31(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412215610491

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. BlackLAN. (n.d.). Black Landscape Architects Network. Retrieved July 18, 2021, from https://blacklanetwork.org
5. 1. Bohannon, C. L.

   (2014). Design education reconsidered: Faculty perceptions of community engagement in landscape architecture. [Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University]. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1986778574/abstract/74BF2EE84579420APQ/1
6. 1. Boone, C. G.,
   2. Buckley, G. L.,
   3. Grove, J. M., &
   4. Sister, C.

   (2009). Parks and people: An environmental justice inquiry in Baltimore, Maryland. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 99(4), 767–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045600903102949

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. 1. Boone, K.

   (2020). Notes toward a history of black landscape architecture. Places Journal, October. https://doi.org/10.22269/201028
8. 1. Bruton, C. M., &
   2. Floyd, M. F.

   (2014). Disparities in built and natural features of urban parks: Comparisons by neighborhood level race/ethnicity and income. Journal of Urban Health, 91 (5), 894–907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-014-9893-4

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
9. 1. Caelli K,
   2. Ray L,
   3. Mill J.

   ‘Clear as Mud’: Toward Greater Clarity in Generic Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, June 2003:1–13. doi:10.1177/160940690300200201

   OpenUrlCrossRef
10. 1. Cheng, C.,
    2. Martin, T.

    (2019, August 13). Environmental justice survey findings. The field. ASLA Professional practice network’s blog. https://thefield.asla.org/2019/08/13/environmental-justice-survey-findings/
11. Council of Educators in Landscape Architecture [CELA]. (n.d.). Joint diversity statement. Retrieved August 24, 2021, from https://thecela.org/joint-diversity-statement/
12. 1. Curran, W., &
    2. Hamilton, T.

    (2012). Just green enough: Contesting environmental gentrification in Greenpoint, Brooklyn. Local Environment, 17(9), 1027–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2012.729569

    OpenUrlCrossRef
13. 1. Deming, M. E.

    (2011). Landscape architecture research: Inquiry, strategy, design. Wiley.
14. 1. Eteläpelto, A.,
    2. Vähäsantanen, K.,
    3. Hökkä, P., &
    4. Paloniemi, S.

    (2013). What is agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work. Educational Research Review, 10, 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.001

    OpenUrl
15. 1. Harris, D.

    (2007). Race, space, and the destabilization of practice. Landscape Journal, 26(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.26.1.1

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
16. 1. Hester, R. T., Jr..

    (1999). A Refrain with a view [Participation with a view]. Places, 12(2). http://escholarship.org/uc/item/87c2d02w
17. 1. Hester, R.

    (2006). Design for ecological democracy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
18. 1. Hirsch, A. B.

    (2012). Facilitation and/or manipulation?: Lawrence Halprin and “Taking Part.” Landscape Journal: Design, Planning, and Management of the Land, 31(1), 117–34.

    OpenUrl
19. 1. Hirsch, A. B.

    (2014). From “open space” to “public space”: Activist landscape architects of the 1960s. Landscape Journal, 33(2), 173–94. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.33.2.173

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
20. 1. Hood, W., &
    2. Tada, G. M.

    (2020). Black landscapes matter. University of Virginia Press.
21. 1. Hughey, S. M.,
    2. Walsemann, K. M.,
    3. Child, S.,
    4. Powers, A.,
    5. Reed, J. A., &
    6. Kaczynski, A. T.

    (2016). Using an environmental justice approach to examine the relationships between park availability and quality indicators, neighborhood disadvantage, and racial/ethnic composition. Landscape and Urban Planning, 148, 159–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.12.016

    OpenUrl
22. LAND. (2021). LAAB publishes revised accreditation standards and procedures. https://www.asla.org/land/LandArticle.aspx?id=58944
23. 1. Low, S.,
    2. Taplin, D., &
    3. Scheld, S.

    (2009). Rethinking urban parks: Public space and cultural diversity. University of Texas Press.
24. 1. Mitchell, D.

    (2003). Right to the city : Social justice and the fight for public space. Guilford Press. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/alltitles/docDetail.action?docID=10642347
25. 1. Newman, G.,
    2. Li, D.,
    3. Tao, Z., &
    4. Zhu, R.

    (2021). Recent trends in LAbased research: A topic analysis of CELA abstract content. Landscape Journal, 39(2), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.3368/wplj.39.2.51

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
26. 1. Noto, P.,
    2. Ruswick, T.,
    3. Spiegelhalter, K.

    (2018). Environmental justice and landscape architecture: A student’s guide. American Society of Landscape Architects.
27. 1. Rigolon, A., &
    2. Németh, J.

    (2018). What shapes uneven access to urban amenities? Thick injustice and the legacy of racial discrimination in Denver’s parks. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 1, 14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X18789251

    OpenUrl
28. 1. Rigolon, A., &
    2. Németh, J.

    (2020). Green gentrification or “just green enough”: Do park location, size and function affect whether a place gentrifies or not? Urban Studies, 57(2), 402–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019849380

    OpenUrl
29. 1. Rios, M., and
    2. Napawan, N. C.

    (2018). Diversity and inclusion by design: A challenge for us all. Landscape Journal, 37(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.37.1.1

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
30. 1. Rowe, W.

    (2014) Positionality. In The SAGE encyclopedia of action research. SAGE Publications Ltd, https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446294406.n277
31. 1. Schneekloth, L. H., &
    2. Shibley, R. G.

    (1995). Placemaking: The art and practice of building communities. Wiley.
32. 1. Schneekloth, L. H., &
    2. Shibley, R. G.

    (2008). The public realm: Weaving a regional civic life. Landscape Journal, 27(2), 205–18. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.27.2.205

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
33. 1. Secules, S.,
    2. McCall, C.,
    3. Mejia, J. A.,
    4. Beebe, C.,
    5. Masters, A. S.,
    6. Sánchez-Peña, M. L., &
    7. Svyantek, M.

    (2021). Positionality practices and dimensions of impact on equity research: A collaborative inquiry and call to the community. Journal of Engineering Education, 110(1), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20377

    OpenUrl
34. 1. Spirn, A. W.

    (2005). Restoring Mill Creek: Landscape literacy, environmental justice and city planning and design. Landscape Research, 30(3), 395–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390500171193

    OpenUrlCrossRef
35. 1. Staton, B.,
    2. Kramer, J.,
    3. Gordon, P., &
    4. Valdez, L.

    (2016). From the technical to the political: Democratizing design thinking. CONTESTED_CITIES MADRID. http://contested-cities.net/working-papers/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2016/07/WPCC-165008-StatonKramerGordonValdez-FromTechnicalToPolitical.pdf, 10
36. 1. Stevens, J. L.,
    2. Toews, B., &
    3. Wagenfeld, A.

    (2018). Designing the correctional landscape: An invitation to landscape architecture professionals. Landscape Journal, 37(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.37.1.55

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
37. A student’s guide to environmental justice. (n.d.). Retrieved July 17, 2021, from https://www.asla.org/uploadedFiles/CMS/PPNs/Landing_Pages/A%20Student’s%20Guide%20to%20Environmental%20Justice%20V%201.3.pdf
38. 1. Tajfel, H.

    (1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information, 13(2), 65–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847401300204

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
39. 1. Treuhaft, S.,
    2. Blackwell, A. G., &
    3. Pastor, M.

    (2011). America’s tomorrow: Equity is the superior growth model. Policy Link. http://www.policylink.org/sites/default/files/SUMMIT_FRAMING_SUMMARY_WEB.PDF
40. 1. Turner, J. C.,
    2. Brown, R. J., &
    3. Tajfel, H.

    (1979). Social comparison and group interest ingroup favouritism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9(2), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420090207

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
41. 1. Wolch, J.,
    2. Wilson, J. P., &
    3. Fehrenbach, J.

    (2005). Parks and park funding in Los Angeles: An equity-mapping analysis. Urban Geography, 26(1), 4–35. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.26.1.4

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science