A Qualitative Study of Practitioner Perspectives on Landscape Architecture and Equity

REFERENCES

1. American Society of Landscape Architects [ASLA]. (n.d.-a) Diversity, equity, and inclusion. Retrieved June 14, 2021, from https://www.asla.org/DEI.aspx
2. American Society of Landscape Architects [ASLA]. (n.d.-b) Environmental Justice Retrieved July 17, 2021, from https://www.asla.org/justice.aspx
3. ↵
   1. Anguelovski, I.

   (2016). From toxic sites to parks as (green) LULUs? New challenges of inequity, privilege, gentrification, and exclusion for urban environmental justice. Journal of Planning Literature, 31(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412215610491

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. BlackLAN. (n.d.). Black Landscape Architects Network. Retrieved July 18, 2021, from https://blacklanetwork.org
5. ↵
   1. Bohannon, C. L.

   (2014). Design education reconsidered: Faculty perceptions of community engagement in landscape architecture. [Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University]. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1986778574/abstract/74BF2EE84579420APQ/1
6. ↵
   1. Boone, C. G.,
   2. Buckley, G. L.,
   3. Grove, J. M., &
   4. Sister, C.

   (2009). Parks and people: An environmental justice inquiry in Baltimore, Maryland. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 99(4), 767–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045600903102949

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. ↵
   1. Boone, K.

   (2020). Notes toward a history of black landscape architecture. Places Journal, October. https://doi.org/10.22269/201028
8. ↵
   1. Bruton, C. M., &
   2. Floyd, M. F.

   (2014). Disparities in built and natural features of urban parks: Comparisons by neighborhood level race/ethnicity and income. Journal of Urban Health, 91 (5), 894–907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-014-9893-4

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
9. ↵
   1. Caelli K,
   2. Ray L,
   3. Mill J.

   ‘Clear as Mud’: Toward Greater Clarity in Generic Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, June 2003:1–13. doi:10.1177/160940690300200201

   OpenUrlCrossRef
10. ↵
    1. Cheng, C.,
    2. Martin, T.

    (2019, August 13). Environmental justice survey findings. The field. ASLA Professional practice network’s blog. https://thefield.asla.org/2019/08/13/environmental-justice-survey-findings/
11. Council of Educators in Landscape Architecture [CELA]. (n.d.). Joint diversity statement. Retrieved August 24, 2021, from https://thecela.org/joint-diversity-statement/
12. ↵
    1. Curran, W., &
    2. Hamilton, T.

    (2012). Just green enough: Contesting environmental gentrification in Greenpoint, Brooklyn. Local Environment, 17(9), 1027–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2012.729569

    OpenUrlCrossRef
13. ↵
    1. Deming, M. E.

    (2011). Landscape architecture research: Inquiry, strategy, design. Wiley.
14. ↵
    1. Eteläpelto, A.,
    2. Vähäsantanen, K.,
    3. Hökkä, P., &
    4. Paloniemi, S.

    (2013). What is agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work. Educational Research Review, 10, 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.001

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Harris, D.

    (2007). Race, space, and the destabilization of practice. Landscape Journal, 26(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.26.1.1

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
16. ↵
    1. Hester, R. T., Jr.

    (1999). A Refrain with a view [Participation with a view]. Places, 12(2). http://escholarship.org/uc/item/87c2d02w
17. 1. Hester, R.

    (2006). Design for ecological democracy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
18. ↵
    1. Hirsch, A. B.

    (2012). Facilitation and/or manipulation?: Lawrence Halprin and “Taking Part.” Landscape Journal: Design, Planning, and Management of the Land, 31(1), 117–34.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Hirsch, A. B.

    (2014). From “open space” to “public space”: Activist landscape architects of the 1960s. Landscape Journal, 33(2), 173–94. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.33.2.173

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
20. ↵
    1. Hood, W., &
    2. Tada, G. M.

    (2020). Black landscapes matter. University of Virginia Press.
21. ↵
    1. Hughey, S. M.,
    2. Walsemann, K. M.,
    3. Child, S.,
    4. Powers, A.,
    5. Reed, J. A., &
    6. Kaczynski, A. T.

    (2016). Using an environmental justice approach to examine the relationships between park availability and quality indicators, neighborhood disadvantage, and racial/ethnic composition. Landscape and Urban Planning, 148, 159–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.12.016

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    LAND. (2021). LAAB publishes revised accreditation standards and procedures. https://www.asla.org/land/LandArticle.aspx?id=58944
23. ↵
    1. Low, S.,
    2. Taplin, D., &
    3. Scheld, S.

    (2009). Rethinking urban parks: Public space and cultural diversity. University of Texas Press.
24. ↵
    1. Mitchell, D.

    (2003). Right to the city : Social justice and the fight for public space. Guilford Press. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/alltitles/docDetail.action?docID=10642347
25. ↵
    1. Newman, G.,
    2. Li, D.,
    3. Tao, Z., &
    4. Zhu, R.

    (2021). Recent trends in LAbased research: A topic analysis of CELA abstract content. Landscape Journal, 39(2), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.3368/wplj.39.2.51

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
26. ↵
    1. Noto, P.,
    2. Ruswick, T.,
    3. Spiegelhalter, K.

    (2018). Environmental justice and landscape architecture: A student’s guide. American Society of Landscape Architects.
27. ↵
    1. Rigolon, A., &
    2. Németh, J.

    (2018). What shapes uneven access to urban amenities? Thick injustice and the legacy of racial discrimination in Denver’s parks. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 1, 14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X18789251

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Rigolon, A., &
    2. Németh, J.

    (2020). Green gentrification or “just green enough”: Do park location, size and function affect whether a place gentrifies or not? Urban Studies, 57(2), 402–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019849380

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Rios, M., and
    2. Napawan, N. C.

    (2018). Diversity and inclusion by design: A challenge for us all. Landscape Journal, 37(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.37.1.1

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
30. ↵
    1. Rowe, W.

    (2014) Positionality. In The SAGE encyclopedia of action research. SAGE Publications Ltd, https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446294406.n277
31. ↵
    1. Schneekloth, L. H., &
    2. Shibley, R. G.

    (1995). Placemaking: The art and practice of building communities. Wiley.
32. ↵
    1. Schneekloth, L. H., &
    2. Shibley, R. G.

    (2008). The public realm: Weaving a regional civic life. Landscape Journal, 27(2), 205–18. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.27.2.205

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
33. 1. Secules, S.,
    2. McCall, C.,
    3. Mejia, J. A.,
    4. Beebe, C.,
    5. Masters, A. S.,
    6. Sánchez-Peña, M. L., &
    7. Svyantek, M.

    (2021). Positionality practices and dimensions of impact on equity research: A collaborative inquiry and call to the community. Journal of Engineering Education, 110(1), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20377

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Spirn, A. W.

    (2005). Restoring Mill Creek: Landscape literacy, environmental justice and city planning and design. Landscape Research, 30(3), 395–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390500171193

    OpenUrlCrossRef
35. ↵
    1. Staton, B.,
    2. Kramer, J.,
    3. Gordon, P., &
    4. Valdez, L.

    (2016). From the technical to the political: Democratizing design thinking. CONTESTED_CITIES MADRID. http://contested-cities.net/working-papers/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2016/07/WPCC-165008-StatonKramerGordonValdez-FromTechnicalToPolitical.pdf, 10
36. ↵
    1. Stevens, J. L.,
    2. Toews, B., &
    3. Wagenfeld, A.

    (2018). Designing the correctional landscape: An invitation to landscape architecture professionals. Landscape Journal, 37(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.37.1.55

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
37. A student’s guide to environmental justice. (n.d.). Retrieved July 17, 2021, from https://www.asla.org/uploadedFiles/CMS/PPNs/Landing_Pages/A%20Student’s%20Guide%20to%20Environmental%20Justice%20V%201.3.pdf
38. ↵
    1. Tajfel, H.

    (1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information, 13(2), 65–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847401300204

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
39. ↵
    1. Treuhaft, S.,
    2. Blackwell, A. G., &
    3. Pastor, M.

    (2011). America’s tomorrow: Equity is the superior growth model. Policy Link. http://www.policylink.org/sites/default/files/SUMMIT_FRAMING_SUMMARY_WEB.PDF
40. 1. Turner, J. C.,
    2. Brown, R. J., &
    3. Tajfel, H.

    (1979). Social comparison and group interest ingroup favouritism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9(2), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420090207

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
41. ↵
    1. Wolch, J.,
    2. Wilson, J. P., &
    3. Fehrenbach, J.

    (2005). Parks and park funding in Los Angeles: An equity-mapping analysis. Urban Geography, 26(1), 4–35. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.26.1.4

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science