Research ArticlePeer-Reviewed Articles
Open Access

Transdisciplinarity and Boundary Work for Landscape Architecture Scholars

Joan Iverson Nassauer
Landscape Journal, May 2023, 42 (1) 1-11; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.42.1.1

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA)
    . (2022). ASLA At a Glance. https://www.asla.org/aboutasla.aspx
  2. ↵
    1. Arts, B.,
    2. Buizer, M.,
    3. Horlings, L.,
    4. Ingram, V.,
    5. van Oosten, C., &
    6. Opdam, P.
    (2017). Landscape approaches: State of the art review. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 42(1).
  3. ↵
    1. Brown, R. D., &
    2. Corry, R. C.
    (2011). Evidence-based landscape architecture: The maturing of a profession. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100(4), 327–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.01.017
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Cantrell, B., &
    2. Holzman, J.
    (2016). Responsive landscapes: Strategies for responsive technologies in landscape architecture. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
  5. ↵
    1. Cash, D. W.,
    2. Clark, W. C.,
    3. Alcock, F.,
    4. Dickson, N. M.,
    5. Eckley, N.,
    6. Guston, D. H., … &
    7. Mitchell, R. B.
    (2003). Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 100(14), 8086–8091.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Corry, R. C.
    (2021). Visions and expectations for publishing landscape scholarship. Landscape Journal, 40(2), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.40.2.101
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Crewe, K., &
    2. Forsyth, A.
    (2003). LandSCAPES: A typology of approaches to landscape architecture. Landscape Journal, 22(1), 37–53.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Deming, M. E., &
    2. Swaffield, S. R.
    (2011). Landscape architecture research: Inquiry, strategy, design. Wiley.
  9. ↵
    1. Felson, A. J., &
    2. Pickett, S. T.
    (2005). Designed experiments: New approaches to studying urban ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 3(10), 549–556.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Frumkin, H.,
    2. F.,
    3. L., &
    4. Jackson, R.
    (2004). Urban Sprawl and Public Health. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  11. ↵
    1. Gobster, P. H., &
    2. Xiang, W. N.
    (2012). What do we mean by “landscape”?. Landscape and Urban Planning, 106, 219–220.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Grose, M. J.
    (2014). Gaps and futures in working between ecology and design for constructed ecologies. Landscape and Urban Planning, 132, 69–78.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    1. Helfenstein, J.,
    2. Bauer, L.,
    3. Clalüna, A.,
    4. Bolliger, J., &
    5. Kienast, F.
    (2014). Landscape ecology meets landscape science. Landscape Ecology, 29(7), 1109–1113.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Hester, R. T.
    (2006). Design for ecological democracy. MIT Press.
  15. ↵
    1. Hester, R. T.
    (2011). Afterword. Landscape Journal, 30(1), 148–150.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Hough, M.
    (1984). City form and natural processes. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
  17. ↵
    1. Jantsch, E.
    (1972). Education for design. Futures, 4(3), 232–255.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Johnson, B. R., &
    2. Hill, K.
    (2002). Ecology and design: Frameworks for learning. Island Press.
  19. ↵
    1. Kullmann, K.
    (2016). Disciplinary convergence: Landscape architecture and the spatial design disciplines. Journal of Landscape Architecture, 11(1), 30–41.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Landscape Architecture Foundation
    . (2016). New Landscape Declaration. https://www.lafoundation.org/take-action/new-landscape-declaration#nlddocument
  21. ↵
    1. Langley, W. N.,
    2. Corry, R. C., &
    3. Brown, R. D.
    (2018). Core knowledge domains of landscape architecture. Landscape Journal, 37(1), 9–21.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Lock, S. J.
    (2016). Cultures of incomprehension?: The legacy of the two cultures debate at the end of the twentieth century. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 41(2–3), 148–166.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Lotz, L.,
    2. Pickering, J.,
    3. Weber, E.,
    4. Contestabile, M.,
    5. Pearson, A.,
    6. Voinov, A., … &
    7. Fischhoff, B.
    (2019). Twenty questions about design behavior for sustainability, report of the International Expert Panel on behavioral science for design. Nature Sustainability.
  24. ↵
    1. Mastrángelo, M. E.,
    2. Pérez-Harguindeguy, N.,
    3. Enrico, L.,
    4. Bennett, E.,
    5. Lavorel, S.,
    6. Cumming, G. S., … &
    7. Zoeller, K.
    (2019). Key knowledge gaps to achieve global sustainability goals. Nature Sustainability, 2(12), 1115–1121.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Meyer, E. K.
    (2000). The post–Earth Day conundrum: Translating environmental values into landscape design. In M. Conan (Ed.), Environmentalism in landscape architecture (pp. 187–244). Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection.
  26. ↵
    1. Milburn, L.-A. S., &
    2. Brown, R. D.
    (2003). The relationship between research and design in landscape architecture. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64(1–2), 47–66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    1. Mohai, P.
    (1995). The demographics of dumping revisited: Examining the impact of alternate methodologies in environmental justice research. Virginia Environmental Law Journal, 14(4), 615–653.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Mozingo, L. A.
    (1997). The aesthetics of ecological design: Seeing science as culture. Landscape Journal, 16(1), 46–59.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Nassauer, J. I.
    (1985). Bringing science to landscape architecture. CELA Forum, 5, 5.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Nassauer, J. I.
    (2012). Landscape as medium and method for synthesis in urban ecological design. Landscape and Urban Planning, 106(3), 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.03.014
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    1. Nassauer, J. I.
    (2020). Landscape science in studio. In K. Jorgenson, N. Karadeniz, E. Mertens, & R. Stiles (Eds.), Teaching science in studio (pp. 150–161). Routledge.
  32. ↵
    1. Naveh, Z.
    (2001). Ten major premises for a holistic conception of multifunctional landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 57(3–4), 269–284.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    1. Naveh, Z.
    (2007). The transformation of landscape ecology and restoration ecology into transdisciplinary sciences of holistic landscape study, management and planning, conservation and restoration. In Z. Naveh (Ed.), Transdisciplinary challenges in landscape ecology and restoration ecology (pp. 355–401), Springer.
  34. ↵
    1. Norström, A. V.,
    2. Cvitanovic, C.,
    3. Löf, M. F.,
    4. West, S.,
    5. Wyborn, C.,
    6. Balvanera, P., … &
    7. Österblom, H.
    (2020). Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research. Nature sustainability, 3(3), 182–190.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Snow, C. P.
    (1959). Two cultures. Science, 130(3373).
  36. ↵
    1. Spirn, A. W.
    (1984). The granite garden. Basic Books.
    1. Star, S. L.
    (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology & Human Values, 35, 601–617.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  38. ↵
    1. Stokols, D.
    (2011). Transdisciplinary action research in landscape architecture and planning: Prospects and challenges. Landscape Journal, 30(1), 1–5.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    1. Thering, S., &
    2. Chanse, V.
    (2011). The scholarship of transdisciplinary action research toward a new paradigm for the planning and design professions. Landscape Journal, 30(1), 6–18.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Tress, B., &
    2. Tress, G.
    (2001). Capitalising on multiplicity: A transdisciplinary systems approach to landscape research. Landscape and Urban Planning, 57(3), 143–157.
    OpenUrl
  41. ↵
    1. Tress, G.,
    2. Tress, B., &
    3. Fry, G.
    (2005). Clarifying integrative research concepts in landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology, 20(4), 479–493.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  42. ↵
    1. Van den Brink, M.,
    2. Edelenbos, J.,
    3. van den Brink, A.,
    4. Verweij, S.,
    5. van Etteger, R., &
    6. Busscher, T.
    (2019). To draw or to cross the line? The landscape architect as boundary spanner in Dutch river management. Landscape and Urban Planning, 186, 13–23.
    OpenUrl
  43. ↵
    1. Vicenzotti, V.
    (2017). The landscape of landscape urbanism. Landscape Journal, 36(1), 75–86.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Weddle, A.
    (1974). Landscape planning—Aims and scope of a new journal. Landscape and Planning, 1, 1–5.
    OpenUrl
  45. ↵
    1. Weller, R.
    (2006). An art of instrumentality: Thinking through landscape urbanism. In C. Waldheim (Ed.), The landscape urbanism reader (pp. 69–85). Princeton Architectural Press.
  46. ↵
    1. Weller, R.
    (2018). The critical landscape architectural project. Journal of Landscape Architecture, 13(3), 20–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2018.1589129
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    1. Wu, J.
    (2006). Landscape ecology, cross-disciplinarity, and sustainability science. Landscape Ecology, 21(1), 1–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  48. ↵
    1. Wu, J.
    (2008). Making the case for landscape ecology: An effective approach to urban sustainability. Landscape Journal, 27(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.27.1.41
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Wu, J.
    (2013). Landscape sustainability science: Ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 28(6), 999–1023.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  50. ↵
    1. Wu, J.
    (2021). Landscape sustainability science (II): Core questions and key approaches. Landscape Ecology, 36(8), 2453–2485.
    OpenUrl
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Transdisciplinarity and Boundary Work for Landscape Architecture Scholars
Joan Iverson Nassauer
Landscape Journal May 2023, 42 (1) 1-11; DOI: 10.3368/lj.42.1.1
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

Keywords