Decolonizing the Language of Landscape Architecture

WORKS CITED

1. ↵
   1. American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA)

   . (2018). Mirroring the nation: Landscape architecture and the future of the profession. ASLA Diversity Summit. https://www.asla.org/uploadedFiles/CMS/AboutJoin/MirroringTheNationOfficial.pdf
2. ↵
   1. American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA)

   . (2020a). Racial equity plan of action. https://www.asla.org/racialequityplan.aspx
3. ↵
   1. American Society of Landscape Architects (ALSA)

   . (2020b). Catalog of demands made at each school. PDF document provided by Kristopher Pritchard, ASLA Accreditation and Education Director, via email correspondence on 24 September 2021.
4. ↵
   1. Anzaldúa, G.

   (2012). Borderlands: The new mestiza = la frontera (4th edition, 25th anniversary.). Aunt Lute Books.
5. ↵
   1. Anzaldúa, G., &
   2. Keating, A.

   (2009). The Gloria Anzaldúa reader. Duke University Press.
6. ↵
   1. Artiles, A. J., &
   2. Kozleski, E. B.

   (2007). Beyond convictions: Interrogating culture, history, and power in inclusive education.
7. ↵
   1. Bélanger, P.,
   2. Bianchi-Beguria, H.,
   3. Jafari, G.,
   4. Escudero, P.,
   5. Kaewen Dang, T., &
   6. Arroyo, A. S.

   (2020). No design on stolen land: Dismantling design’s dehumanising white supremacy. Architectural Design. The landscapists: Redefining landscape relations, 90(1), Article 1 https://doi.org/doi:10.1002/ad.2535

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Boyer, E. L.

   (1996). The scholarship of engagement. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 49(7), 18–33.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
9. ↵
   1. Caputo, J. D., &
   2. Derrida, J.

   (2020). Deconstruction in a nutshell: A conversation with Jacques Derrida. Fordham University Press.
10. ↵
    1. Carlson, D., &
    2. Collard-Arias, M.

    (2021). Trajectories of practice across time: Moving beyond the histories of landscape architecture. Landscape Research, 4(1): 25–34.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Castro-Gómez, S.

    (2021). Zero-point hubris: Science, race, and enlightenment in eighteenth-century Latin America. Rowman & Littlefield.
12. ↵
    1. Central Park Conservancy

    . (2018). Before Central Park: The story of Seneca Village. https://www.centralparknyc.org/articles/seneca-village
13. 1. Chamorro, L.

    (2022). Introducing Tierra Media Project: Making space for Latine/x/a/o voices in search of new definitions of engagement with the land. 2022 LAF Innovation & Leadership Symposium. https://www.lafoundation.org/resources/2022/06/2022-symposium-videos
14. ↵
    1. Crysler, C. G.

    (1995). Critical pedagogy and architectural education. Journal of Architectural Education, 48(4), 208–217.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. ↵
    1. Dang, T. K.

    (2021). Decolonizing landscape, Landscape Research, 46(7), 1004–1016.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. David-Chavez, D. M., &
    2. Gavin, M. C.

    (2018). A global assessment of Indigenous community engagement in climate research. Environmental Research Letters, 13(12), 123005.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Denevan, W.

    (1992). The pristine myth: The landscape of the Americas in 1492. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 82(3), 369–385.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. ↵
    1. Diver, S.,
    2. Vaughan, M.,
    3. Baker-Médard, M., &
    4. Lukacs, H.

    (2019). Recognizing “reciprocal relations” to restore community access to land and water. International Journal of the Commons, 13(1), 400–429. http://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.881

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Doherty, G., &
    2. Waldheim, C.

    (2015). Is Landscape … ? Essays on the Identity of Landscape. Routledge.
20. ↵
    1. Durmus, S., &
    2. Gur, S. O.

    (2011). Methodology of deconstruction in architectural education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1586–1594.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Escobar, P.

    (2018). Designs for the pluriverse: Radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Duke University Press.
22. ↵
    1. Fothergill, A.,
    2. Maestas, E. G., &
    3. Darlington, J. D.

    (2002). Race, ethnicity and disasters in the United States: A review of the literature. Disasters, 23(2), 156–173.

    OpenUrl
23. 1. Freire, P.,
    2. Ramos, M. B., &
    3. Macedo, D.

    (2014). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.; 30th anniversary ed.). Bloomsbury.
24. ↵
    1. Friess, D. A., &
    2. Jazeel, T.

    (2017). Unlearning “landscape.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 107(1), 14–21.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Gilmore, R. W.

    (2022). Abolition geography: Essays towards liberation.
26. 1. Green, J.

    (2020, June 24). Interview with Walter Hood: Black landscapes matter. The Dirt, American Society of Landscape Architecture. https://dirt.asla.org/2020/06/24/interview-with-walter-hood-black-landscapes-matter/
27. 1. Guenther, D.

    (2022). Design in kinship: Toward relational work between designers and community organizations. 2022 LAF Innovation & Leadership Symposium. https://www.lafoundation.org/resources/2022/06/2022-symposium-videos
28. 1. Haraway, D.

    (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
29. ↵
    1. Hammersley, L.

    (2017). Language matters: Reciprocity and its multiple meanings. In Learning through community engagement (pp. 115–131). Springer.
30. ↵
    1. Hood, W. J.

    (2003). “Beyond Nomenclature: Urban Parks for Cultural Diversity,” in Places, 15(3), 34–37.

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. Hou, J.

    (2020). Design as activism. Landscape architecture education for social change: A framework for actions and other propositions. Project Report of the 2019 LAF Fellowship for Innovation & Leadership. https://designactivism.be.uw.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/25/2021/03/DesignAsActivism2020-1.pdf
32. 1. Hou, J.

    (2021, February 19). Landscape architects can become changemakers, but first we need to change how they are taught. Dirt ASLA. https://dirt.asla.org/2021/04/19/landscape-architects-can-become-changemakers-but-first-we-need-to-change-how-they-are-taught/
33. ↵
    1. Huang, Y., &
    2. Napawan, N. C.

    (2021). “Separate but equal?” Understanding gender differences in urban park usage and its implications for gender-inclusive design. Landscape Journal, 40(1), 1–16.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
34. ↵
    1. Hubbard, P.

    (2001). Sex zones: Intimacy, citizenship and public space. Sexualities, 4(1), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/136346001004001003

    OpenUrlCrossRef
35. ↵
    1. Hughey, S. M.,
    2. Walsemann, K. M.,
    3. Child, S.,
    4. Powers, A.,
    5. Reed, J. A., &
    6. Kaczynski, A. T.

    (2016). Using an environmental justice approach to examine the relationships between park availability and quality indicators, neighborhood disadvantage, and racial/ethnic composition. Landscape and Urban Planning, 148, 159–169.

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Hunt, J. D.

    (2004). The afterlife of gardens. University of Pennsylvania Press.
37. ↵
    1. Jazeel, T.

    (2012). Dissimulated landscapes: Postcolonial method and the politics of space in southern Sri Lanka. Environment and Planning D, 31, 61–79.

    OpenUrl
38. ↵
    1. Jenerette, G. D.,
    2. Harlan, S. L.,
    3. Stefanov, W. L., &
    4. Martin, C. A.

    (2011). Ecosystem services and urban heat riskscape moderation: Water, green spaces, and social inequality in Phoenix, USA. Ecological applications, 21(7), 2637–2651.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
39. ↵
    1. Johnson, B.

    (2005). Overcoming “doom and gloom”: Empowering students in courses on social problems, injustice, and inequality. Teaching Sociology, 33(1), 44–58.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
40. ↵
    1. Johnson, N. L.,
    2. Lilja, N., &
    3. Ashby, J. A.

    (2003). Measuring the impact of user participation in agricultural and natural resource management research. Agricultural systems, 78(2), 287–306.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
41. ↵
    1. Kimmerer, R. W.

    (2013). The fortress, the river and the garden. In Contemporary Studies in Environmental and Indigenous Pedagogies. Brill. https://brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9789462092938/BP000005.xml
42. ↵
    1. Kimmerer, R. W.

    (2017). Learning the grammar of animacy 1. Anthropology of Consciousness, 28(2), 128–134.

    OpenUrl
43. ↵
    1. Kozleski, E. B., &
    2. Waitoller, F. R.

    (2010). Teacher learning for inclusive education: understanding teaching as a cultural and political practice. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(7), 655–666. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603111003778379

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
44. ↵
    1. Landscape Architecture Accreditation Board (LAAB)

    . (2021). Accreditation standards for professional programs in landscape architecture. Accessible at https://www.asla.org/uploadedFiles/LAAB_ACCREDITATION_STANDARDS_SEPTEMBER2021.pdf
45. ↵
    1. Law, J.

    (2015). What’s wrong with a one-world world? Distinktion (Aarhus), 16(1), 126–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2015.1020066

    OpenUrl
46. 1. Mann

    . (2006). 1491: New revelations of the Americas before Columbus (1st Vintage books ed.). Vintage.
47. ↵
    1. Márquez-Mina, F.

    [@FranciaMarquezM]. (2018, September 21). El territorio es la vida y la vida no se vende, se ama y se defiende. [Tweet]. Twitter. https://twitter.com/franciamarquezm/status/1043083187214327808?lang=gl
48. ↵
    1. Meinig, D. W.

    (1979). The beholding eye: Ten versions of the same scene.
49. ↵
    1. Meyer, E.

    (1997). The expanded field of landscape architecture. In G. F. Thompson & F. R. Steiner (Eds.), Ecological Design and Planning, Thompson (pp. 45–79). Wiley.
50. ↵
    1. Mignolo, W. D.

    (2009). Epistemic disobedience, independent thought and decolonial freedom. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(7–8), 159–181.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
51. ↵
    1. Mignolo, W. D.

    (2022). Academic profile of Walter Mignolo. https://scholars.duke.edu/person/walter1654
52. ↵
    1. Oliver, J.

    (2007) Beyond the water’s edge: Towards a social archaeology of landscape on the Pacific Northwest, in Canadian Journal of Archaeology, 31, 1–27.

    OpenUrl
53. 1. Oregon Humanities Center

    [https://www.youtube.com/c/OregonHumanitiesCenter]. (2018, March 14). Robin Wall Kimmerer: “We the People”: expanding the circle of citizenship for public lands [Video]. You Tube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtBarogsj5E
54. ↵
    1. Pompa, L.

    (2005). Service-learning as crucible: Reflections on immersion, context, power, and transformation. In Service-learning in higher education (pp. 173–192). Palgrave Macmillan.
55. ↵
    1. Powers, R.

    (2021). A little more than kin. In G. Horn, R. W. Kimmerer, & J. Hausdoerffer (Eds.), Kinship: Belonging in a World of Relations, Vol. 3—Partners. Center for Humans and Nature.
56. ↵
    1. Quante, H., &
    2. Escott, A.

    (2014). The bureau of linguistical reality: About. https://bureauoflinguisticalreality.com/about/
57. ↵
    1. Reid, A. J.,
    2. Eckert, L. E.,
    3. Lane, J.,
    4. Young, N.,
    5. Hinch, S. G.,
    6. Darimont, C.T.,
    7. Cooke, S. J.,
    8. Ban, N. C., &
    9. Marshall, A.

    (2020). “‘Two-eyed seeing’: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management.” Fish and Fisheries, 22(2), 1467–2960.

    OpenUrl
58. ↵
    1. Rothstein, R.

    (2017). The color of law: A forgotten history of how our government segregated America. Liveright.
59. ↵
    1. Said, E. W.

    (1978). Orientalism. Routledge. (Original work published 1970).
60. ↵
    1. Salazar, M.

    (2015). Reframing Freire: Situating the principles of humanizing pedagogy within an ecological model of the preparation of teachers. The Routledge handbook of educational linguistics. Routledge, 197–209.
61. ↵
    1. Salmón, E.

    (2000). Kincentric ecology: Indigenous perceptions of the human-nature relationship. Ecological Applications, 10(5), 1327–1332.

    OpenUrl
62. ↵
    1. Salmón, E.

    (2017). No word. In G. V. Horn & J. Hausdoerffer (Eds.), Wildness: Relations of people and place (pp. 24–32). University of Chicago Press.
63. ↵
    1. Samayeen, N.,
    2. Wong, A., &
    3. McCarthy, C.

    (2020). Space to breathe: George Floyd, BLM plaza and the monumentalization of divided American urban landscapes. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1–11.
64. ↵
    1. Sandilands, C.

    (n.d.). “Queer Ecology.” In J. Adamson, W. Gleason, and D. Pellow (Eds.), Keywords for environmental studies. https://keywords.nyupress.org/environmental-studies/essay/queer-ecology/
65. ↵
    1. Schenker, H. M.

    (1994). Feminist perspectives in landscape architecture. Landscape Journal, 13(2), 107–112.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
66. ↵
    1. Shiva

    . (1993). Monocultures of the mind—understanding the threats to biological and cultural diversity. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 39(3), 237–248.

    OpenUrl
67. ↵
    1. Smith, L. T.

    (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). Zed Books.
68. ↵
    1. Stilgoe, J.

    (1980). Landschaft and linearity: Two archetypes of landscapes. Environmental Review, 4(1), 2–17.

    OpenUrl
69. ↵
    1. Suganuma, K.

    (2011). Ways of speaking about queer space in Tokyo: Disorientated knowledge and counter-public space. Japanese Studies, 31(3), 345–358, https://doi.org/10.1080/10371397.2011.619168

    OpenUrl
70. ↵
    1. Tuck, E., &
    2. Yang, K. W.

    (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, education & society, 1(1), 1–40.

    OpenUrl
71. 1. Vaughn, A.

    (2021). Design with disabled people now: Including disabled people in the design process. 2021 LAF Fellowship for Innovation & Leadership. https://www.lafoundation.org/resources/2021/07/2021-symposium-videos-part-2#alexa
72. ↵
    1. Wolfe, P.

    (2006). Settler colonialism and the elimination of the native. Journal of Genocide Research, 8(4), 387–409.

    OpenUrlCrossRef