Intentional Outcomes

References

1. ↵
   Act to amend the patent and trademark laws, H.R. 6933, 96th Cong. (1980). https://www.congress.gov/bill/96th-congress/house-bill/6933
2. ↵
   1. Altomonte, S.

   , Rutherford, P., & Wilson, R. (2012). Mapping the way forward: Education for sustainability in architecture and urban design. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1311
3. ↵
   ASLA. (2004). Landscape Architecture Body of Knowledge Study Report. T. A. S. o. L. Architects.
4. ↵
   1. Barbarash, D.

   (2016). Knowledge and skill competency values of an undergraduate university managed cooperative internship program: A case study in design education. Asia‐Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 17(1), 21–30.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Barbarash, D.

   (2018). Developing a standard for curricular evaluation in landscape architectural education [Conference presentation]. CELA 2018, Blacksburg, VA.
6. ↵
   1. Barbarash, D.

   (2021). Impacts of the COVID‐19 induced rapid shift to online teaching and learning [Conference presentation]. CELA 2021, Virtual.
7. ↵
   1. Barbarash, D.

   (2022). Balancing renaissance education and professional preparedness in design programs [Conference presentation]. CELA 2022, Santa Ana Pueblo, New Mexico.
8. ↵
   1. Bender, D. M.

   (2005). Developing a collaborative multidisciplinary online design course. The Journal of Educators Online, 2(2), 1–12. http://thejeo.com/Diane%20Bender%20Final.pdf

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   Bloom’s Taxonomy. (2023). Retrieved 10/27/2023 from https://bloomstaxonomy.net/
10. ↵
    1. Canfield, J.

    , & Yang, B. (2014). Reflections on developing landscape performance case studies. Landscape Research Record, 1, 310–317.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Cantrell, B.

    , & Mekies, A. (2018). Codify: Parametric and computational design in landscape architecture. Routledge.
12. ↵
    1. Fagan, E.

    (2017). Evidence‐based design: Structured approaches in leading landscape architecture practice [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Kansas State University. https://krex.k-state.edu/dspace/handle/2097/34626
13. ↵
    1. Fan, Y.

    , Shepherd, L. J., Slavich, E., Waters, D., Stone, M., Abel, R., & Johnston, E. L. (2019). Gender and cultural bias in student evaluations: Why representation matters. PloS one, 14(2), e0209749.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Fink, L. D.

    (2013). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. Jossey‐Bass, John Wiley & Sons.
15. ↵
    1. Geiger, R. L.

    (2000). The American college in the nineteenth century ( R. Geiger, Ed.). Vanderbilt University Press.
16. ↵
    1. Geiger, R. L.

    (2004). To advance knowledge: The growth of American research universities, 1900–1940. Routledge.
17. ↵
    1. Geiger, R. L.

    (2019). American higher education since World War II. In American Higher Education since World War II. Princeton University Press.
18. ↵
    1. Grubb, W. N.

    , & Lazerson, M. (2005). Vocationalism in higher education: The triumph of the education gospel. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(1), 1–25.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. ↵
    1. Hedin, S.

    , Jóhannesson, H., Steineke, J. M., Niinikoski, E.‐R., Smas, L., & Olsen, L. S. (2009). Interaction between higher education institutions and their surrounding business environment: Six Nordic case studies.
20. ↵
    1. Hurtado, S.

    (2001). Linking diversity and educational purpose: How diversity affects the classroom environment and student development. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED456199
21. ↵
    1. Hwang, N.

    , & Kisida, B. (2022). Spread too thin: The effect of specialization on teaching effectiveness. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 44(4), 593–607.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Ingraham, K. C.

    , Davidson, S. J., & Yonge, O. (2018). Student‐faculty relationships and its impact on academic outcomes. Nurse Education Today, 71, 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.08.021

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Kardia, D. B.

    , & Wright, M. C. (2004). Instructor identity: The impact of gender and race on faculty experiences with teaching. Occasional Paper. University of Michigan Center for Research on Learning and Teaching.
24. ↵
    1. Kickert, R.

    , Meeuwisse, M., Stegers‐Jager, K. M., Prinzie, P., & Arends, L. R. (2022). Curricular fit perspective on motivation in higher education. Higher Education, 83(4), 729–745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00699-3

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Knight, P. T.

    , & Yorke, M. (2003). Employability and good learning in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 8(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356251032000052294

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Kogan, J.

    (2014). Student course evaluation: Class size, class level, discipline and gender bias. International Conference on Computer Supported Education. https://www.scitepress.org/PublishedPapers/2014/48618/pdf/index.html
27. ↵
    1. Krathwohl, D. R.

    (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(4), 212–218.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
28. ↵
    1. Lazerson, M.

    (1997). Who owns higher education?: The changing face of governance. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 29(2), 10–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00091389709603099

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Levy, A.

    (1980). Total studio. Journal of Architectural Education, 34(2), 29–32.

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. Marsh, H. W.

    , & Hattie, J. (2002). The relation between research productivity and teaching effectiveness: Complementary, antagonistic, or independent constructs? The Journal of Higher Education, 73(5), 603–641.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
31. ↵
    1. Na, S.

    (2021). Case analysis and applicability review of parametric design in landscape architectural design. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 49(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2021.49.2.001

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    1. Ozimek, A.

    & Ozimek, P. (2011), The idea of “integrated design” in digital techniques teaching. In: DLA 2011, Proc. of Digital Landscape Architecture 2011, Hochschule Anhalt, Bernberg, Germany. DLA 2011. Hochschule Anhalt (Web), 13 Jan. 2013.
33. ↵
    1. Pedersen, C.

    (2020). The parametric process: A strategic analysis on digital design technology in landscape architecture [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Guelph.
34. ↵
    1. Ray, J.

    , & Marken, S. (2014). Life in college matters for life after college. Gallup—Economy. https://news.gallup.com/poll/168848/life-college-matters-life-college.aspx
35. ↵
    1. Rice, T.

    , & Lincon, C. (2016). Teaching design in landscape architecture programs [Conference presentation]. 9th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, Seville, Spain.
36. ↵
    1. Rotar, S.

    , Barbarash, D., Dahl, B., & Hildner, A. (2014). Improving student learning through integrated project experiences. Landscape Research Record, 1, 63–71.

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Sandhu, H. S.

    , Chen, R., & Wong, A. (2022). Faculty diversity matters: A scoping review of student perspectives in North America. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2022.2048720
38. ↵
    1. Schnell, B.

    , & Rodríguez, N. (2017). Ivory tower vs. workplace reality. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 11(2–3), 160–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2017.1344920

    OpenUrl
39. ↵
    1. Steinitz, C.

    (1990). A framework for theory applicable to the education of landscape architects (and other environmental design professionals). Landscape Journal, 9(2), 136–143.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
40. ↵
    1. Teal, R.

    (2011). Foundational history: An integrated approach to basic design, history, and theory. Journal of Architectural Education, 64(2), 37–45.

    OpenUrl
41. ↵
    1. Utaberta, N.

    , & Hassanpour, B. (2012a). Aligning assessment with learning outcomes. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 60, 228–235.

    OpenUrl
42. ↵
    1. Utaberta, N.

    , & Hassanpour, B. (2012b). Reconstructing a framework for criteria‐based assessment and grading in architecture design studio. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 60, 142–149.

    OpenUrl
43. ↵
    1. Walliss, J.

    , & Rahmann, H. (2016). Landscape architecture and digital technologies: Re‐conceptualising design and making (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315713526
44. ↵
    1. Wang, Z.

    , Yang, B., Li, S., & Binder, C. (2016). Economic benefits: Metrics and methods for landscape performance assessment. Sustainability, 8(5), 424. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/5/424

    OpenUrl
45. ↵
    1. Wehlburg, C. M.

    (2010). Integrated general education: A brief look back. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2010(121), 3–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.383

    OpenUrl
46. ↵
    1. Wieman, C. E.

    (2019). Expertise in university teaching, the implications for teaching effectiveness, evaluation, training. Daedalus, 148(4), 47–78. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01760

    OpenUrl
47. ↵
    1. Yang, B.

    , Li, S., & Binder, C. (2016). A research frontier in landscape architecture: landscape performance and assessment of social benefits. Landscape Research, 41(3), 314–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2015.1077944

    OpenUrl