Zoning: A Prospective Instrument of Climate Adaptation

References

1. ↵
   1. Adger, W.

   , Lorenzoni, I., & O’Brien, K. (2009). Adapting to climate change: Thresholds, values, governance. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4959.2010.00360_5.x
2. ↵
   1. Ahern, J.

   (2010). Planning and design for sustainable and resilient cities: Theories, strategies and best practices for green infrastructure. In V. Novotny, J. Ahern, & P. Brown (Eds.), Water‐centric sustainable communities (pp. 135–176). Wiley.
3. ↵
   1. Ahern, J.

   (2011). From fail‐safe to safe‐to‐fail: Sustainability and resilience in the new urban world. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100(4), 341–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. ↵
   1. Ahern, J.

   (2013). Urban landscape sustainability and resilience: The promise and challenges of integrating ecology with urban planning and design. Landscape Ecology, 28(6), 1203–1212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-012-9799-z

   OpenUrlCrossRef
5. ↵
   1. Babcock, R. F.

   (1966). Zoning game: Municipal practices and policies. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
6. ↵
   1. Beauregard, R. A.

   (1989). Between modernity and postmodernity: The ambiguous position of US planning. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 7(4), 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1068/d070381

   OpenUrlCrossRef
7. ↵
   1. Ben‐Joseph, E.

   (2005). The code of the city: Standards and the hidden language of place making. The MIT Press.
8. ↵
   1. Bosselman, F.

   , & Tarlock, A. (1994). The influence of ecological science on American law: An introduction. Chicago‐Kent Law Review, 69(4), 847–873.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Botkin, D. B.

   (1990). Discordant harmonies: A new ecology for the twenty‐first century. Oxford University Press, 1990.
10. ↵
    1. Botkin, D. B.

    (2012). The Moon in the nautilus shell: Discordant harmonies reconsidered (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.
11. ↵
    1. Bronin, S.

    (2020). Comprehensive rezonings. BYU Law Review, 2019(3), 725–768.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Bronin, S.

    (2023). Zoning by a thousand cuts. Pepperdine Law Review, 50(4), 719–784.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    Broward County. (2019). BrowardNEXT—Broward County land use plan. https://www.broward.org:443/BrowardNext/Pages/default.aspx
14. ↵
    1. Burby, R. J.

    , Deyle, R. E., Godschalk, D. R., & Olshansky, R. B. (2000). Creating hazard resilient communities through land‐use planning. Natural Hazards Review. 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2000)1:2(99)
15. ↵
    1. Burgess, E.

    (2008). The growth of the city: An introduction to a research project. Publications of the American Sociological Society, 18, 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73412-5_5. (Original work published in 1925).

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Checker, M.

    (2011). Wiped out by the “Greenwave”: Environmental gentrification and the paradoxical politics of urban sustainability. City & Society, 23(2), 210–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-744X.2011.01063.x

    OpenUrlCrossRef
17. ↵
    City of Boston. (2016). Climate Ready Boston Report. https://www.boston.gov/sites/default/files/file/2023/03/2016_climate_ready_boston_executive_summary_1.pdf
18. ↵
    1. Colding, J.

    (2007). “Ecological land‐use complementation” for building resilience in urban ecosystems. Landscape and Urban Planning, 81(1–2), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.10.016

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. ↵
    1. Cronon, W.

    (1996a). The trouble with wilderness; Or, getting back to the wrong nature. Environmental History, 1(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/3985059

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. ↵
    1. Cronon, W.

    (1996b). Uncommon ground: Rethinking the human place in nature. Norton.
21. ↵
    1. Cumming, G. S.

    (2011). Spatial resilience: Integrating landscape ecology, resilience, and sustainability. Landscape Ecology, 26(7), 899–909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-011-9623-1

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. ↵
    1. Cumming, G. S.

    , Barnes, G., Perz, S., Schmink, M., Sieving, K. E., Southworth, J., Binford, M., Holt, R. D., Stickler, C., & Van Holt, T. (2005). An exploratory framework for the empirical measurement of resilience. Ecosystems (New York), 8(8), 975–987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-005-0129-z

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Deckker, T.

    (2005). Modern city revisited. Taylor & Francis.
24. ↵
    1. Duerksen, C.

    (2008). Saving the world through zoning. Planning, 74(1), 28–33.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Eisenman, T. S.

    (2013). Frederick Law Olmsted, green infrastructure, and the evolving city. Journal of Planning History, 12(4), 287–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538513212474227

    OpenUrlCrossRef
26. ↵
    Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2024, July 10). Biden‐Harris Administration finalizes rule to increase resilience against flooding nationwide. FEMA.gov. https://www.fema.gov/press-release/20240710/biden-harris-administration-finalizes-rule-increase-resilience-against
27. ↵
    1. Freemark, Y.

    , & Lo, L. (2022, May 24). Effective zoning reform isn’t as simple as it seems. Bloomberg.com. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-05-24/the-limits-of-ending-single-family-zoning
28. ↵
    1. Folke, C.

    , Carpenter, S., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., Holling, C. S., & Walker, B. (2002). Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 31(5), 437–440.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
29. ↵
    1. Folke, C.

    , Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., & Holling, C. S. (2004). Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 35(1), 557–581. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105711

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. ↵
    1. Garnett, N. S.

    (2013). Redeeming transect zoning? Brooklyn Law Review, 78(2), 571–588.

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. Golley, F. B.

    (1993). A history of the ecosystem concept in ecology: More than the sum of the parts. Yale University Press. http://libproxy.mit.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat00916a&AN=mit.000674054&site=eds-live
32. ↵
    1. Golley, F. B.

    , & Bellot, J. (1991). Interactions of landscape ecology, planning and design. Landscape and Urban Planning, 21(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(91)90028-K

    OpenUrlCrossRef
33. ↵
    1. Goodman, W. I.

    , & Freund, E. C. (1968). Principles and practice of urban planning. Washington, D.C. Institute for Training in Municipal Administration by the International City Managers’ Association. http://libproxy.mit.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat00916a&AN=mit.000857747&site=eds-live
34. ↵
    1. Green, J.

    (2024, July 29). To reduce flood risk, FEMA looks to nature‐based solutions. THE DIRT. https://dirt.asla.org/2024/07/29/fema-will-now-use-latest-science-and-nature-to-reduce-future-flood-risks/
35. ↵
    1. Hadley, D.

    (2009). Land use and the coastal zone. Land Use Policy, 26, S198–S203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.09.014

    OpenUrlCrossRef
36. ↵
    1. Harmon, E.

    (2021, July 1). Climate resilient land use background. MAPC—Metropolitan Area Planning Council. https://www.mapc.org/resource-library/climate-resilient-land-use-background/
37. ↵
    1. Hirt, S. A.

    (2014). Zoned in the USA: The origins and implications of American land‐use regulation. Cornell University Press.
38. ↵
    1. Jaffe, E.

    (2020, February 6). Is it time to end single‐family zoning? Medium Magazine. https://medium.com/sidewalk-talk/is-it-time-to-end-single-family-zoning-56233d69a25a
39. ↵
    1. Jepson, E. J.

    , & Haines, A. L. (2014). Zoning for sustainability: A review and analysis of the zoning ordinances of 32 cities in the United States. Journal of the American Planning Association, 80(3), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2014.981200

    OpenUrlCrossRef
40. ↵
    1. Kaiser, E. J.

    , & Godschalk, D. R. (1995). Twentieth century land use planning: A Stalwart family tree. Journal of the American Planning Association, 61(3), 365–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369508975648

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
41. ↵
    1. Kay, J. J.

    (1991). A nonequilibrium thermodynamic framework for discussing ecosystem integrity. Environmental Management, 15(4), 483–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02394739

    OpenUrl
42. ↵
    1. Kay, J. J.

    , & Schneider, E. (1995). Embracing complexity the challenge of the ecosystem approach. In L. Westra & J. Lemons (Eds.), Perspectives on ecological integrity (pp. 49–59). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0451-7_4
43. ↵
    1. Kayden, J.

    (2020). Is zoning the answer? What’s the question? In E. Sclar, B. Baird‐Zars, L. A. Fischer, & V. Stahl (Eds.), Zoning: A guide for 21st‐century planning (1st ed.). Routledge.
44. ↵
    1. Kayden, J.

    , Haar, C., & Walter, K. (1989). Zoning and the American dream: Promises still to keep. Planners Press.
45. ↵
    1. Kendig, L.

    (1980). Performance zoning (1st ed.). Planners Press, American Planning Association.
46. ↵
    1. Kim, J.

    , & Zhou, X. (2012). Landscape structure, zoning ordinance, and topography in hillside residential neighborhoods: A case study of Morgantown, WV. Landscape and Urban Planning, 108(1), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.07.011

    OpenUrlCrossRef
47. ↵
    1. Klaus, S. L.

    (1991). Efficiency, economy, beauty: The city planning reports of Frederick Law Olmsted, Jr., 1905–1915. Journal of the American Planning Association, 57(4), 456–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369108975520

    OpenUrlCrossRef
48. ↵
    1. Knack, R.

    , Meck, S., & Stollman, I. (1996). The real story behind the standard planning and zoning acts of the 1920s. Land Use Law & Zoning Digest, 48(2), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00947598.1996.10395877

    OpenUrl
49. ↵
    1. Kullmann, K.

    (2017). Reconceptualizing suburban terracing: Topographically responsive development scenarios for a sandy coastal site. Landscape Journal, 36(1), 15–36. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.36.1.15

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
50. ↵
    1. Kunzig, R.

    (2016, April 1). Why the new sea level alarm can’t be ignored. National Geographic News. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2016/04/160401-climate-change-sea-level-antarctica-ice-melt-physics/
51. ↵
    1. Lister, N.‐M. E.

    (1998). A systems approach to biodiversity conservation planning. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 49(2), 123–155. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005861618009

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
52. ↵
    1. Marwedel, J.

    (1998). Opting for performance: An alternative to conventional zoning for land use regulation. CPL Bibliography, 13(2), 220–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/088541229801300205

    OpenUrl
53. ↵
    1. Masoud, F.

    , & Holland, E. (2021). Landscape architecture is resilient design: Enduring strategies and frameworks adapted from the Olmsted Office. Journal of Landscape Architecture, 16(3), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2021.2046769

    OpenUrlCrossRef
54. ↵
    1. Matin, N.

    , Forrester, J., & Ensor, J. (2018). What is equitable resilience? World Development, 109, 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.04.020

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
55. ↵
    1. McGill, B.

    (2013). A macroecological approach to the equilibrial vs. nonequilibrial debate using bird populations and communities. In K. Rohde (Ed.), The balance of nature and human impact (pp. 103–118). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139095075.012
56. ↵
    1. McHarg, I. L.

    (1969). Design with nature. San Val, Incorporated.
57. ↵
    1. Mendonca, J.

    (2023, September 20). Zoning for climate change: How cities are preparing for future threats. Smart Growth America. https://smartgrowthamerica.org/zoning-for-climate/
58. ↵
    1. Merchant, C.

    (1990). The death of nature: Women, ecology, and the scientific revolution. HarperOne. (Original work published 1980).
59. ↵
    National Academy of Public Administration. (2003). For EPA. Retrieved from www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-02/documents/napa-land-use-zoning-63003.pdf
60. ↵
    National Institute of Standards and Technology NIST. (2015). Community resilience planning guide (Text No. 1190; NIST Special Publications). https://www.nist.gov/topics/community-resilience/planning-guide
61. ↵
    New York City Planning. (2019, May). Zoning for coastal flood resiliency—planning for resilient neighbourhoods. https://www1.nyc.gov/site/planning/plans/flood-resilience-zoning-text-update/flood-resilience-zoning-text-update.page
62. ↵
    1. Odum, H. T.

    (1983). Systems ecology: An introduction. Wiley.
63. ↵
    1. Olmsted Jr., F. L.

    (1913). A city planning program. Proceedings of the Fifth National Conference on City Planning, 1–10.
64. ↵
    1. Onsted, J. A.

    , & Chowdhury, R. R. (2014). Does zoning matter? A comparative analysis of landscape change in Redland, Florida using cellular automata. Landscape and Urban Planning, 121, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.09.007

    OpenUrlCrossRef
65. ↵
    1. Park, R. E.

    (1936). Succession, an ecological concept. American Sociological Review, 1(2), 171–171. https://doi.org/10.2307/2084475

    OpenUrlCrossRef
66. ↵
    1. Park, R. E.

    , Burgess, E. W., & Janowitz, M. (1984). The city: Suggestions for investigation of human behavior in the urban environment. University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1925).
67. ↵
    1. Peterson, J. A.

    (2009). The birth of organized city planning in the United States, 1909–1910. Journal of the American Planning Association, 75(2), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360802608484

    OpenUrlCrossRef
68. ↵
    1. Pickett, S. T. A.

    , Cadenasso, M. L., & Grove, J. M. (2004). Resilient cities: Meaning, models, and metaphor for integrating the ecological, socio‐economic, and planning realms. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69(4), 369–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
69. ↵
    1. Pimm, S. L.

    (1984). The complexity and stability of ecosystems. Nature, 307(5949), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1038/307321a0

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
70. ↵
    1. Platt, R. H.

    (1976). Land use control: Interface of law and geography. Resource Paper No. 75‐1. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED155111
71. ↵
    1. Popering‐Verkerk, J.

    , Molenveld, A., Duijn, M., van Leeuwen, C., & van Buuren, A. (2022). A framework for governance capacity: A broad perspective on steering efforts in society. Administration & Society, 54(9), 1767–1794. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211069932

    OpenUrlCrossRef
72. ↵
    1. Porse, E.

    (2014). Risk‐based zoning for urbanizing floodplains. Water Science & Technology, 70(11), 1755–1763. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2014.256

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
73. ↵
    1. Postell, J.

    (2012). The anti‐New Deal progressive: Roscoe Pound’s alternative administrative state. Review of Politics, 74(1), 53–85.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
74. ↵
    1. Reps, J. W.

    (1964). Requiem for zoning, planning 1964 (pp. 56–67). Chicago: American Society of Planning Officials.
75. ↵
    1. Schwab, J. C.

    (2010). Hazard mitigation: Integrating best practices into planning. (APA Planning Advisory Service Report No. 560).
76. ↵
    1. Schwab, J. C.

    , Berginnis, C., Turner, T., Read, A., & Walny, N. (2016). Subdivision design and flood hazard areas (APA Publications PAS Reports PAS 584). https://www.planning.org/publications/report/9112664/
77. ↵
    1. Sclar, E.

    , Baird‐Zars, B., Fischer, L. A., & Stahl, V. (Eds.). (2019). Zoning: A guide for 21st‐century planning (1st ed.). Routledge.
78. ↵
    1. Serkin, C.

    , & Macey, G. P. (2013). Post‐zoning: Alternative forms of public land use controls. Social Science Research Network. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2290256
79. ↵
    1. Steiner, F. R.

    , Thompson, G. F., & Carbonell, A. (Eds.). (2016). Nature and Cities: The Ecological Imperative in Urban Design and Planning. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
80. ↵
    1. Steiner, F.

    , Young, G., & Zube, E. (1988). Ecological planning: Retrospect and prospect. Landscape Journal, 7(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.7.1.31

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
81. ↵
    1. Sussna, S.

    (1966). Fifty years of zoning. American Bar Association Journal, 52(11), 1030–1033. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25723800

    OpenUrl
82. ↵
    1. Talen, E.

    , Anselin, L., Lee, S., & Koschinsky, J. (2016). Looking for logic: The zoning—land use mismatch. Landscape and Urban Planning, 152, 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.04.002

    OpenUrlCrossRef
83. ↵
    1. Tarlock, A. D.

    (2014). Zoned not planned. Planning Theory, 13(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095212469942

    OpenUrlCrossRef
84. ↵
    1. Taylor, P. J.

    (1988). Technocratic optimism, H. T. Odum, and the partial transformation of ecological metaphor after World War II. Journal of the History of Biology, 2, 213–244.

    OpenUrl
85. ↵
    1. Tjallingii, S. P.

    (2000). Ecology on the edge: Landscape and ecology between town and country. Landscape and Urban Planning, 48(3–4), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00035-9

    OpenUrlCrossRef
86. ↵
    United Nations Development Programme. (2024, January 30). What is climate change adaptation and why is it crucial? UNDP Climate Promise. https://climatepromise.undp.org/news-and-stories/what-climate-change-adaptation-and-why-it-crucial
87. ↵
    1. Vale, L. J.

    , & Campanella, T. J. (2005). The resilient city: How modern cities recover from disaster. Oxford University Press, USA.
88. ↵
    1. Valk, A.

    (2014). From formation to ecosystem: Tansley’s response to Clements’ climax. Journal of the History of Biology, 47(2), 293–321.

    OpenUrlPubMed
89. ↵
    Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. 272 U.S. 365. (1926). Retrieved April 21, 2015, from https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/272/365/case.html
90. ↵
    1. Von Hoffman, A.

    (2021, October 5). Single‐family zoning: Can history be reversed? Joint Center for Housing Studies. https://www.jchs.harvard.edu/blog/single-family-zoning-can-history-be-reversed
91. ↵
    1. Wagner, M.

    , Gentile, L., Merson, J., & Wentz, E. (2016a). Sustainable urban planning and climate change scenarios: An investigation of Staten Island’s urban planning. Proceedings of the Fábos Conference on Landscape and Greenway Planning, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.7275/fabos.614
92. ↵
    1. Wagner, M.

    , Merson, J., & Wentz, E. A. (2016b). Design with nature: Key lessons from McHarg’s intrinsic suitability in the wake of Hurricane Sandy. Landscape and Urban Planning, 155, 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.06.013

    OpenUrlCrossRef
93. ↵
    1. Waltner‐Toews, D.

    , Kay, J. J., & Lister, N.‐M. E. (2008). The ecosystem approach: Complexity, uncertainty, and managing for sustainability. Columbia University Press.
94. ↵
    1. Wang, W.

    , Zhao, X., Cao, J., Li, H., & Zhang, Q. (2020). Barriers and requirements to climate change adaptation of mountainous rural communities in developing countries: The case of the eastern Qinghai‐Tibetan Plateau of China. Land Use Policy, 95, 104354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104354

    OpenUrlCrossRef
95. ↵
    1. Watson, S.

    (2019). Zoning to adapt: Climate change zoning and the lessons of environmental zoning efforts past. In E. Sclar, B. Baird‐Zars, L. A. Fischer, & V. Stahl (Eds.), Zoning: A guide for 21st‐century planning (1st ed.). Routledge.
96. ↵
    1. Wolch, J. R.

    , Byrne, J., & Newell, J. P. (2014). Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities “just green enough.” Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
97. ↵
    1. Wolf, M. A.

    (2008). The zoning of America: Euclid v. Ambler. University Press of Kansas.
98. ↵
    1. Zuk, M.

    , Bierbaum, A. H., Chapple, K., Gorska, K., & Loukaitou‐Sideris, A. (2018). Gentrification, displacement, and the role of public investment. Journal of Planning Literature, 33(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412217716439

    OpenUrlCrossRef