Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • ASLA Research Grant
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Ecological Restoration
    • Land Economics
    • Native Plants Journal

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Landscape Journal
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
    • Ecological Restoration
    • Land Economics
    • Native Plants Journal
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Landscape Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • ASLA Research Grant
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Visit uwp on Facebook
EditorialEditor’s Letter

Editor’s Letter

James LaGro Jr.
Landscape Journal, May 2025, 44 (1) iv-v; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.44.1.iv
James LaGro Jr.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

STEM and Landscape Architecture

Any categorization is a function of its selection criteria. The categorization of STEM fields is a case in point. Scientific administrators at the U.S. National Science Foundation introduced the acronym STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) in 2001 (Hallinen, 2024). This was partly in response to declines in standardized scores for math and science tests taken by American elementary and high school students. Gaps between STEM education and the skills required in the workplace are ongoing concerns within industry, government, and academia (Jang, 2015).

Efforts to improve STEM education and literacy in the United States, however, has had mixed results. The absence of a clear definition of STEM contributed to disagreements about what professions qualified as STEM careers (Hallinen, 2024). If the intent was to help fields that emphasize innovation, problem‐solving, and critical thinking, the federal agencies promoting STEM education should have included architecture and landscape architecture on that original list. This omission may have prevented access to targeted funding for STEM education, research, and professional development.

The International Federation of Landscape Architects (IFLA) estimates there are as many as one million landscape architects worldwide. Many of them work in private practice, government agencies, and university faculties. This field has developed in important ways over the past quarter‐century. For example, the number of landscape architecture faculty with doctoral degrees continues its upward trend. Greater research capacity within the field has led to more funded research and more published scholarship. The field’s scholars regularly publish in peer‐reviewed journals that collectively span the arts and humanities, social sciences, and applied biological and physical sciences.

Persistent advocacy by the American Institute of Architects (AIA) and the American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA) recently convinced the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to add degrees in architecture and landscape architecture as recognized STEM programs. Most architects and landscape architects, like many engineers, are not scientists. Yet, all three professions apply science, technology, and mathematics in designing built environments to function as intended while protecting public health, safety, and well‐being. Landscape architects regularly collaborate with architects, engineers, and ecologists in designing these places where people work, live, learn, and play.

An interagency working group recently divided STEM occupations into two domains, each with two sub‐domains (Hallinen, 2024, 4).

The first domain is the Science, Engineering, Mathematics, and Information Technology Domain, with the sub‐domains Life and Physical Science, Engineering, Mathematics, and Information Technology Occupations; and Social Science Occupations.

The second domain is the Science‐ and Engineering‐Related Domain, with the sub‐domains Architecture Occupations and Health Occupations. The list of STEM occupations includes relevant education fields and social science as STEM careers.

Urban sustainability challenges—especially in the context of climate change—require the expertise of architects, landscape architects, engineers, and ecologists. Innovative collaborations are more likely to advance sustainability through designs that not only are functional and cost effective, but also yield added co‐benefits. Green roofs, for example, can be designed to generate energy, recycle rainwater, reduce building heating and cooling costs, and establish pollinator refuges, all while creating beautiful outdoor spaces for human enjoyment.

STEM professionals leverage cross‐disciplinary knowledge to solve complex problems and implement elegant design solutions (Jang, 2015; Jonassen et al., 2006). Efforts to collaboratively solve complex design problems often result in the diffusion of ideas across disciplines. As urban populations grow and climates change, the importance of climate resilient, healthy, and sustainable cities will place even greater demands on effective collaborations across allied disciplines and professions.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Hallinen, J.
    (2024). “STEM.” Encyclopedia Britannica, 13 Nov. 2024, https://www.britannica.com/topic/STEM-education.
  2. ↵
    1. Jang, H.
    (2015, November 18). Identifying 21st century STEM competencies using workplace data. Journal of Science Education and Technology.
  3. ↵
    1. Jonassen, D.
    , Strobel, J., & Lee, C. (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 139–151.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Landscape Journal: 44 (1)
Landscape Journal
Vol. 44, Issue 1
1 May 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Landscape Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Editor’s Letter
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Landscape Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Landscape Journal web site.
Citation Tools
Editor’s Letter
James LaGro Jr.
Landscape Journal May 2025, 44 (1) iv-v; DOI: 10.3368/lj.44.1.iv

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Editor’s Letter
James LaGro Jr.
Landscape Journal May 2025, 44 (1) iv-v; DOI: 10.3368/lj.44.1.iv
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • STEM and Landscape Architecture
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Editor’s Letter
  • Editor’s Letter
Show more Editor’s Letter

Similar Articles

UW Press logo

© 2026 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire