Elsevier

Health & Place

Volume 28, July 2014, Pages 1-13
Health & Place

Green schoolyards as havens from stress and resources for resilience in childhood and adolescence

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.03.001Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We document student responses to green schoolyards in two elementary schools and four settings for high school students.

  • In green schoolyards, students find peace away from stresses in the classroom and daily life.

  • The variety of engaging affordances in green schoolyards promotes focusing.

  • Students in green schoolyards built competence and cooperative social relationships.

Abstract

This paper investigates how green schoolyards can reduce stress and promote protective factors for resilience in students. It documents student responses to green schoolyards in Maryland and Colorado in the United States under three conditions: young elementary school children׳s play in wooded areas during recess; older elementary school children׳s use of a naturalized habitat for science and writing lessons; and high school students׳ involvement in gardening. Drawing on ethnographic observations and interviews, it describes how the natural areas enabled students to escape stress, focus, build competence, and form supportive social groups. These findings have implications for theories of resilience and restoration and school interventions for stress management.

Section snippets

Childhood stress, resilience, and access to nature

This paper connects the study of stress, resilience, and contact with nature by showing the potential of green schoolyards to reduce stress and enhance protective factors for resilience in children and adolescents. It summarizes observations and interviews in the United States that explored the value of green school grounds for young people: a wooded area for recess play in an elementary school (ages 6–12), an outdoor classroom for older elementary school students (ages 9–13), and gardening

Research questions

Guided by the concepts of affordances and behavior settings, research at each site pursued an open-ended question: How do students experience natural areas on their school grounds? (At one teen site, this question applied to gardening in an after-school program on city property.) In the language of ecological psychology, this question can be stated as: What values do students find in these natural areas?

Settings and samples

The research settings and samples are described in Table 1, Table 2. At each site, the researcher “zoomed in” from observations of the site as a whole to a focus on the experience of individual students. Researchers obtained parent consent forms and student assent to being observed and interviewed, except in the case of 18-year-old high school students, who could give independent consent. The research protocol was approved by the researchers׳ university review boards at the Antioch University

Recess in the woods in early elementary school

As research on children׳s developing abilities to express and analyze emotions would predict (Aldwin, 2007), the young elementary school students at the Jemicy School shared their feelings for their play areas in brief and general terms. Therefore this summary of findings at the Jemicy School relies heavily on observations of students׳ behavior during recess, showing how woods play enabled children to enjoy a sense of competence that was more difficult to achieve in the classroom, and

A naturalized habitat for interdisciplinary learning in grades 4–6

Although students in suburban Denver entered the naturalized area on their school grounds to do class assignments rather than to play, they also found it an escape from classroom stresses, and they could articulate this outcome with greater self-awareness than the younger children in Jemicy. When the sample of 106 students was asked to draw the habitat from memory and write three words that described it, 25% wrote the words “peaceful” or “calm.” The 56 students who gave interviews also used

Gardening programs for high school teens

By adolescence, students were able to reflect at length about their experiences of gardening on their school grounds or in an after-school program as they raised vegetables, fruit, herbs and flowers. The heart of research with this age group was an open-ended interview of about half an hour, done one-on-one at each student׳s garden site. Students were asked to close their eyes and share what came to mind about first being in a garden, followed by questions about what they saw, smelled, heard,

Discussion

The findings reported here add to existing evidence that when students have natural landscapes for play, learning and green views, they show positive moods and reduced stress, anger, inattention and problem behavior (Martensson et al., 2009, Matsuoka, 2010, Roe and Aspinall, 2011). The results are also consistent with evidence that access to nature around the home and neighborhood decreases children׳s symptoms of ADHD (Faber Taylor et al., 2001, Faber Taylor and Kuo, 2009, Kuo and Faber Taylor,

Implications for research and practice

Access to nature at these six sites was not part of any deliberate program to reduce stress and anxiety and build protective factors for resilience, yet it created conditions for the three strategies to enhance resilience that Masten and Reed (2002) identify reducing risks (such as inattention and aggression), building assets (such as concentration and a sense of competence), and mobilizing human adaptational systems (such as cooperative friendships). These findings suggest that the basic

References (89)

  • C.M. Aldwin

    Stress, Coping and Development

    (2007)
  • P. Aspinall et al.

    The urban brain

    Br. J. Sports Med.

    (2013)
  • W. Banning et al.

    Lens on Outdoor Learning

    (2011)
  • R. Barker

    Ecological Psychology

    (1968)
  • A.C. Bell

    Engaging spaces: on school-based habitat restoration

    Can. J. Environ. Educ.

    (2001)
  • A.C. Bell et al.

    Grounds for health: the intersection of green school grounds and health-promoting schools

    Environ. Educ. Res.

    (2008)
  • J. Bennett

    Vibrant Matter

    (2010)
  • B. Benard

    Resiliency: What We Have Learned

    (2004)
  • F.H. Besthorn

    Beetles, bullfrogs, and butterflies: contributions of natural environment to childhood development and resilience

  • D. Blair

    The child in the garden: an evaluative review of the benefits of school gardening

    J. Environ. Educ.

    (2009)
  • W.B. Cannon

    The mechanism of emotional disturbance of bodily functions

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (1928)
  • L. Chawla

    Children׳s engagement with the natural world as a ground for healing

  • L. Chawla

    Childhood experiences associated with care for the natural world: a theoretical framework for empirical results

    Child., Youth Environ.

    (2007)
  • S. Collishaw et al.

    Trends in adolescent mental problems in England

    J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry

    (2010)
  • C.L. Cooper et al.

    Stress: A Brief History

    (2004)
  • S.G. Danks

    Asphalt to Ecosystems: Design Ideas for Schoolyard Transformation

    (2010)
  • J. Dewey

    Democracy and Education

    (1916)
  • I. Dutt

    School design and students׳ relationships with the natural world

    Child., Youth Environ.

    (2012)
  • R. Eckersley

    Never Better – or Getting Worse? The Health and Wellbeing of Young Australians

    (2008)
  • A. Faber Taylor et al.

    Children with attention deficits concentrate better after walk in the park

    J. Atten. Disord.

    (2009)
  • A. Faber Taylor et al.

    Is contact with nature important for healthy child development? State of the evidence

  • A. Faber Taylor et al.

    Views of nature and self-discipline: evidence from inner-city children

    J. Environ. Psychol.

    (2002)
  • A. Faber Taylor et al.

    Coping with ADD: the surprising connection to green play settings

    Environ. Behav.

    (2001)
  • H. Frumkin

    Nature contact and human health: Building the evidence base

  • N. Garmezy et al.

    The protective role of competence indicators in children at risk

  • C.W. Ghinassi

    Anxiety

    (2010)
  • J.J. Gibson

    The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception

    (1979)
  • K.T. Han

    Influence of limitedly visible leafy indoor plants on the psychology, behavior, and health of students at a junior high school in Taiwan

    Environ. Behav.

    (2009)
  • H. Heft

    Ecological Psychology in Context

    (2001)
  • H. Heft

    Foundations of an ecological approach to psychology

  • S. Hinchliffe

    Geographies of Nature

    (2007)
  • J.H. Humphrey

    Childhood Stress in Contemporary Society

    (2004)
  • R. Kaplan et al.

    The Experience of Nature

    (1989)
  • R. Keeler

    Natural Playscapes

    (2008)
  • Cited by (261)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text