Patient Comments on a Hospital- and University-Based Exercise Oncology Program

J Cancer Educ. 2023 Apr;38(2):639-645. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02168-6. Epub 2022 Apr 19.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify referral source and patient-reported factors that promoted follow-through and participation in exercise oncology rehabilitation programs. A three question open-ended survey was administered to patients enrolled in trainer-supervised, hospital-based (n = 101), or university-based (n = 17) cancer rehabilitation program that provided 12 weeks of individualized one on one aerobic and resistance training 1-3 days per week. Significant themes for each question were as follows: Question #1. Who referred you to the program/facility? Oncology team (Χ2 = 145.814 P ≤ 0.001); Question #2. What convinced you to follow through with the referral? Health, fatigue, and need for supervision (Χ2 = 74.814 P ≤ 0.001); and Question #3. What motivates you to continue in the program? Personal results, getting healthy, and the trainer (Χ2 = 108.729 P ≤ 0.001). In this study, oncology team referral confirms previous work. Patient follow-through and continuation appear largely self-motivated as patients' health and the attainment of health through personal results are primary motivators for continuation in the program. Question #3 responses note the importance of the trainer in maintaining continuation in an exercise oncology rehabilitation program.

Keywords: Cancer; Cancer rehabilitation adherence; Exercise oncology; Patient perception.

MeSH terms

  • Exercise Therapy / methods
  • Exercise*
  • Hospitals
  • Humans
  • Medical Oncology* / methods
  • Universities